Forum:Where will we go?: Difference between revisions
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:Although they are keeping monobook, it will not be the automatic skin, so our pages would still look like shit. Monaco's features can almost certainly be replicated on any css we make. | :Although they are keeping monobook, it will not be the automatic skin, so our pages would still look like shit. Monaco's features can almost certainly be replicated on any css we make. | ||
:Also, please don't place comments in the voting section. We've gone back and forth on thus forever without reaching consensus; we all know what each other will say. At this point, we need to be focusing on how we proceed from our discussions.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 22:37, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | :Also, please don't place comments in the voting section. We've gone back and forth on thus forever without reaching consensus; we all know what each other will say. At this point, we need to be focusing on how we proceed from our discussions.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 22:37, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Okay, 1, ShoutWiki loads like crap. Not good. Wikii or whatever may be fine, but, as Shard said above, it may be lacking that ability to customize. And second, what would happen to kingdomhearts.wikia.com? If we were to delete all articles and images on the site, Wikia would see it was vandalism and revert everything back to life, which, would, in effect, create two Kingdom Hearts wikis, and as mentioned before in another thread by Kryten, Google and other search engines will tend to side with Wikia and Wikipedia. That solves nothing. What the hell are we going to do? If we are voting, wouldn't it be better to give the staff the ability to vote twice, thus doubling thier power? Two votes for ShoutWiki is better than one. {{The Inexistentsig}} |
Revision as of 22:39, 26 October 2010
|
Move or no?
This vote will be called on midnight of October 29. You are free to change your vote or abstain until then.
Move
- (ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 14:30, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Erry 14:39, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- 14:54, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- The17Master 15:01, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- --I'm so bored 15:05, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- [[ Soxra ]] 17:40, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 19:50, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- LapisLazuliScarab21:39, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 21:42, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- ShardofTruth 21:52, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
Don't move
- SeanWheeler 21:03, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- LightRoxas 21:09, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- ShadowsTwilight 22:09, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Where to?
This vote will be called on midnight of October 29
If you have other options, post them as a header with a link
ShoutWiki
Wikkii
- (ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 14:30, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Erry 14:39, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- maggosh 15:58, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- While I think private hosting is the best option, it's not feasible for a community like this. [[ Soxra ]] 17:41, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Private hosting
Please provide comments on your proposal
Discussion
We could move to another website altogether, like how wow.wikia.com moved to wowwiki.com. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 19:51, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, but do you have any details on how we'd do that?(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- No, I actually don't. I was thinking we could ask them how they did it, if I wasn't shot down. Sorry, that was just a suggestion :/ --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:59, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, but do you have any details on how we'd do that?(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Like I said [1] here, we could create our own website.Keyblade0
|
|
There is still Monobook after Monaco is gone. They are just keeping Monobook. If we move, we won't have Monaco because that is wikia exclusive. SeanWheeler 21:03, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
There has to be a way we can work it out without moving. LightRoxas 21:09, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Due to recent news of Oasis not being 100% required, although i wish they would still keep Monaco--ShadowsTwilight 22:09, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
While polls (basically votes) don't solve jack, I still want the wiki to be a good place for readers, not for... wait, it's not really good for anyone... KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
- Although they are keeping monobook, it will not be the automatic skin, so our pages would still look like shit. Monaco's features can almost certainly be replicated on any css we make.
- Also, please don't place comments in the voting section. We've gone back and forth on thus forever without reaching consensus; we all know what each other will say. At this point, we need to be focusing on how we proceed from our discussions.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 22:37, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, 1, ShoutWiki loads like crap. Not good. Wikii or whatever may be fine, but, as Shard said above, it may be lacking that ability to customize. And second, what would happen to kingdomhearts.wikia.com? If we were to delete all articles and images on the site, Wikia would see it was vandalism and revert everything back to life, which, would, in effect, create two Kingdom Hearts wikis, and as mentioned before in another thread by Kryten, Google and other search engines will tend to side with Wikia and Wikipedia. That solves nothing. What the hell are we going to do? If we are voting, wouldn't it be better to give the staff the ability to vote twice, thus doubling thier power? Two votes for ShoutWiki is better than one. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.