Category talk:Entelechy: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Do you have a canon alternative? Because Axel uses this in CoM specifically to refer to a complete person.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 03:37, June 18, 2010 (UTC) | :Do you have a canon alternative? Because Axel uses this in CoM specifically to refer to a complete person.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 03:37, June 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Human, for one. But that is only in regards to human characters. I don't ever remember ''Somebody'' being used as the canon term for a complete being. Within the series there are times where the word nobody was used without a capitol n' Zexion really makes it clear. So Axel uses somebody with a capitol s? | Human, for one. But that is only in regards to human characters. I don't ever remember ''Somebody'' being used as the canon term for a complete being. Within the series there are times where the word nobody was used without a capitol n' Zexion really makes it clear. So Axel uses somebody with a capitol s?--[[User:XYZach|XYZ.]] 03:43, June 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:43, 18 June 2010
Seriously?
We are using the term Somebody? That is terrible.--XYZ. 02:49, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a canon alternative? Because Axel uses this in CoM specifically to refer to a complete person.Glorious CHAOS! 03:37, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
Human, for one. But that is only in regards to human characters. I don't ever remember Somebody being used as the canon term for a complete being. Within the series there are times where the word nobody was used without a capitol n' Zexion really makes it clear. So Axel uses somebody with a capitol s?--XYZ. 03:43, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
