Forum:Moderators: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Confidence''': The nominee should not be unsure of what they are doing; they should know when to create a forum for an issue, or when to simply address it on a user's talk page.
*'''Confidence''': The nominee should not be unsure of what they are doing; they should know when to create a forum for an issue, or when to simply address it on a user's talk page.
*'''Knowledge of policy''': A moderator needs to be familiar with our policy, both that listed in the [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] and behavior/disciplinary policy.
*'''Knowledge of policy''': A moderator needs to be familiar with our policy, both that listed in the [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] and behavior/disciplinary policy.
*'''Knowledge of coding''': An important trait for a moderator to have is a knowledge of coding. The nominee should know how to modify existing templates, modify their own talk template, and now basic insert codes for font types, colored text, images, videos, and the like.
*'''Knowledge of coding''': An important trait for a moderator to have is a knowledge of coding. The nominee should know how to modify existing templates, modify their own talk template, and know basic insert codes for font types, colored text, images, videos, and the like. Anything extra is great as well, as coding experts are invaluable.
*'''Reliability and experience''': Select a user who has been active on the ''Kingdom Hearts'' Wiki for a long period of time and has consistantly edited. A relatively new editor or an editor that visits the wiki once every solar eclipse is not going to be a reliable moderator. An editor who has experience with working in a group or on other wikis would be an excellent choice.
*'''Reliability and experience''': Select a user who has been active on the ''Kingdom Hearts'' Wiki for a long period of time and has consistantly edited. A relatively new editor or an editor that visits the wiki once every solar eclipse is not going to be a reliable moderator. An editor who has experience with working in a group or on other wikis would be an excellent choice.


14,551

edits