Forum:Apostrophe-S!: Difference between revisions
(yeah, that is hard to read, sorry) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
{{neumannz|angry=Ok, guys, this is getting bloody obnoxious.<br><span style="font-family:lucida sans">IT'S OK TO HAVE "apostrophe-s" AFTER A SINGULAR NOUN ENDING WITH "s"!</span><br>As always, my sources is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Singular_nouns_ending_with_an_.E2.80.9Cs.E2.80.9D_or_.E2.80.9Cz.E2.80.9D_sound the all-knowing (citation needed) Wikipedia].<br>Since we appear to be using this convention (Ventus's, Xemnas's, etc.) we should try to stick with it—unless of course there's an unresonable stink about it...<br>Anyway, that's my two cents.|time=21:50, December 1, 2009 (UTC)}} | {{neumannz|angry=Ok, guys, this is getting bloody obnoxious.<br><span style="font-family:lucida sans">IT'S OK TO HAVE "apostrophe-s" AFTER A SINGULAR NOUN ENDING WITH "s"!</span><br>As always, my sources is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Singular_nouns_ending_with_an_.E2.80.9Cs.E2.80.9D_or_.E2.80.9Cz.E2.80.9D_sound the all-knowing (citation needed) Wikipedia].<br>Since we appear to be using this convention (Ventus's, Xemnas's, etc.) we should try to stick with it—unless of course there's an unresonable stink about it...<br>Anyway, that's my two cents.|time=21:50, December 1, 2009 (UTC)}} | ||
{{DTN|time=23:25, December 1, 2009 (UTC)|text=Firstly, could you please change your font-type? That's incredibley difficult to read when you thrown in apostrophes and quotations. | {{DTN|time=23:25, December 1, 2009 (UTC)|text=Firstly, could you please change your font-type? That's incredibley difficult to read when you thrown in apostrophes and quotations. | ||
The proper English grammar is to use such terms as Xemnas's, Roxas's, Ventus's, Lexaeus's, etc. You would use the apostrophe after the /s/ only when the term in possessive form is plural, meaning ''more than one''. So, you would so such '''''only''''' in the case of terms such as Shadows', worlds', bosses', Keyblades', characters', games', images', etc. If this is not already in the Manual of Style, I need to add it in there, because this is probably the worst grammar mistake that is used far too commonly on this wiki.}} | |||
{{yer mom|time=00:00, December 2, 2009 (UTC)|text=As Kate said in [[Forum:Plural Possessives|here]] it is NOT a mistake, it's merely a difference in opinions and writing styles. While learning English in elementary school I was taught both ways so I really don't mind. | |||
I do think there was some concensus about keeping it the "words's" way so it should be added to the MoS, to avoid moar conflict}} | |||
{{BebopKate|time=00:01, December 2, 2009 (UTC)|text=Ironically, in that very same article, it also points out it is okay not to add an "s" after a singular possessive. I was actually taught not to add an s in that case by most of my teachers because it "looks sloppy". | |||
If you guys feel the need to make a rule in the MoS, that's fine, but be aware that this is one of those grammatical conventions that can be observed differently from place to place and person to person. Please don't drive yourself crazy over it. | |||
And we wonder why English is so hard to learn? ^_^}} | |||
{{neumannz|text=I don't.|time00:08, December 2, 2009 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 00:15, 2 December 2009
|
|
|
|
|