|
|
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| {{Guardian Soul|text=Do it as you wish, I put the clean-up template for a reason.}} | | {{Guardian Soul|text=Do it as you wish, I put the clean-up template for a reason.}} |
|
| |
|
| == Notes ==
| |
|
| |
|
| For figuring out who wrote what.
| |
|
| |
| *Xemnas and at least one other of the senior members (Possibly down to Saix) know about the Replica Project. Saix appears to have gotten in on it later, by seeing Xion as she truly is. One of these others is possibly Vexen, judging by report 23 ("brought" to Castle Oblivion, and knowing the truth about the Riku Replica). Another one "in the know" comments about the project after the Castle Oblivion incident, but we don't yet know if they talk like Xaldin or Xigbar; they definitely talk as if they were there at the beginning, when Xion was made. This person reports to Xemnas about Xion continuing to sleep - do we have any scenes of Xaldin or Xigbar watching Xion sleep? This person might also be the same one (Xigbar) who comments on Xion getting out of the Organization's control.
| |
| :So it looks like we know at least Xigbar and probably Vexen were writing reports about the Xion Replica project.
| |
| *Axel was told to serve as Roxas' mentor, and soon became friends with him and Xion. After the events at Castle Oblivion, he discovers that Xion is also a Replica, and seeks to learn the truth about her. He seems to treat her even better than before as redemption for how he used the Riku Replica.
| |
| *Luxord is probably the one making gambling metaphors.
| |
| *Demyx is probably the one making musical metaphors.
| |
| *Xigbar sees Xion as Ventus, Saix sees her as a doll, Xemnas started to see her as Roxas, Roxas and Axel see her as a Kairi/Namine lookalike.
| |
| *Axel and Saix knew each other as Somebodies, and joined the Organization together with some kind of plan.
| |
| *Xion was born in Castle Oblivion, Roxas in Twilight Town.
| |
| *Riku, in an Organization coat, encounters Xion and calls her a fake. Xion goes and does something with Riku? Axel is probably the one writing the report identifying Riku, as the writer seems unwilling to turn Xion in and have her be erased. (EDIT) - Yes, it is Axel, as Saix reports that Axel failed to report about Xion and Riku being together.
| |
| *Saix has a plan with Axel, and sees Xion as a doll. Any reports mentioning this plan or dolls are probably written by Saix.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Cleanup == | | == Cleanup == |
Revision as of 11:33, 25 June 2009
http://heartstation.org/?page_id=1328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KrytenKoro - Pinocchio with his nose attached to the trigger of a rifle, which points at his face as he says, "I want to live!"
TALK -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GS, I had to undo your edit because just too much of it was incompatible with our wiki - for example, it contained HS' rambling on who they thought the author was in the headers.
The best way to to go about this is to add the reports one at a time - making sure to cleanup spelling and grammar, and correcting code (apostrophe's especially).
This will also allow the adder to figure out unknown authors with more accuracy, as they'll have read the reports.
I'm going to add a few now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guardian Soul Talk. — Don't I even warrant a hello? It's such a shame. The Organization used to be the rope that bound us together. - {{{time}}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Do it as you wish, I put the clean-up template for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup
The apostrophe's need to be replaced with wiki apostrophe's. Same with quotation marks and ellipses.
The links throughout the article need to be removed, just as they were with the Ansem Reports. It's just a gigantic mess, and should not have been done.
"No. I" should be replaced in all instances with "No. i".Glorious CHAOS! 08:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
