KHWiki:Pages for deletion/Archives/2009 JanMar: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Switched all troisnyxetienne templates to TNE templates.) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
well its up again bebop can we just block things like that[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 04:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | well its up again bebop can we just block things like that[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 04:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|shocktext=Did someone just roll back the changes to Disorganization XIII ? o.O It's the same as I last saw it.}} | ||
they need to make a wiki for all fan things and ect. and I hope this time it gets deletion[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 04:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | they need to make a wiki for all fan things and ect. and I hope this time it gets deletion[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 04:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=yeah. I mean, KHWiki is meant for official KH stuff. For a moment there I '''was''' all fascinated with the idea of Disorganization XIII, but na, it shouldn't take its place here.}} | ||
yeah let my friend bebop duel with it. and troisnyxetienne come to my page if you need some hints on KH[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | yeah let my friend bebop duel with it. and troisnyxetienne come to my page if you need some hints on KH[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
if I see a other I well late you guys duel with it peace[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 02:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | if I see a other I well late you guys duel with it peace[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 02:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Eliskuya2: Sure thing. :) I'm counting on you for that one. | ||
BebopKate: I have a feeling something's seriously wrong. When did you guys last delete the page ?}} | BebopKate: I have a feeling something's seriously wrong. When did you guys last delete the page ?}} | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
its back and I find who makes the thing its DISORGANIZATIONXIIILOVER [[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 21:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | its back and I find who makes the thing its DISORGANIZATIONXIIILOVER [[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 21:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|blahtext=Talk about someone who is true to his name. Guys, can we get the thing deleted and barred already ?}} | ||
I am with you troisnyxet[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 05:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | I am with you troisnyxet[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 05:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
He's posting under multiple IPs, so we can only ban the IPs he posts under and block the article names. If this continues, I will alert the Wikia admins to help us out. In the meantime, just post here to let XienZo or me know to delete and keep wiking away as normal. I have also alerted the Disorganization XIII people to keep our bases covered. Just console yourself that you have more of a life than this guy does. ^_^ [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 05:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | He's posting under multiple IPs, so we can only ban the IPs he posts under and block the article names. If this continues, I will alert the Wikia admins to help us out. In the meantime, just post here to let XienZo or me know to delete and keep wiking away as normal. I have also alerted the Disorganization XIII people to keep our bases covered. Just console yourself that you have more of a life than this guy does. ^_^ [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 05:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Eliskuya2: thankies. and thank goodness you didn't call me trois ^_^ | ||
BebopKate: I'm beginning to wonder if that's all the author of DXIII does with his life. Honestly. I mean, how does '''he''' gain access to that many computers ?}} | BebopKate: I'm beginning to wonder if that's all the author of DXIII does with his life. Honestly. I mean, how does '''he''' gain access to that many computers ?}} | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
I think if I see a other again block the user and the site to the "Disorganizationxiii" thing as well and good night brother Bebop and sister Troisnyxe[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 11:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | I think if I see a other again block the user and the site to the "Disorganizationxiii" thing as well and good night brother Bebop and sister Troisnyxe[[User:Eliskuya2|Eliskuya2]] 11:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Sure. Oyasumi nasai ! | ||
Er, by the way. Just how do we block a user ? o.O}} | Er, by the way. Just how do we block a user ? o.O}} | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
By the way, I feel this needs to be said: DO NOT SPAM OR DOWNVOTE THE DISORGANIZATION XIII YOUTUBE CHANNEL! The people behind it are not the ones who are doing this; I have been in contact with them. It is one of their fans. They are looking around on their end and have made it clear they are not any happier about it than we are, and have apologized for it. I hope whoever has been doing this realizes the potential damage he or she is doing to something they apparently enjoy. [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | By the way, I feel this needs to be said: DO NOT SPAM OR DOWNVOTE THE DISORGANIZATION XIII YOUTUBE CHANNEL! The people behind it are not the ones who are doing this; I have been in contact with them. It is one of their fans. They are looking around on their end and have made it clear they are not any happier about it than we are, and have apologized for it. I hope whoever has been doing this realizes the potential damage he or she is doing to something they apparently enjoy. [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Far as I know, I never downvoted Disorganization XIII before... I'm yet to watch them, actually. But darn it man. Now we are plagued by this jerk who keeps changing computers like anything ! | ||
ugh, and I realised that this is the longest discussion in Pages for Deletion.}} | ugh, and I realised that this is the longest discussion in Pages for Deletion.}} | ||
==There's a page called TroisNyxEtienneText, under templates== | ==There's a page called TroisNyxEtienneText, under templates== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Please do me a favour and remove it. At the time of creation I had just started using Wikia and I had no idea about the Sandbox. That page is kinda redundant now because I've already got my own talk template. | ||
Thanks !}} | Thanks !}} | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:Got it. Thanks for letting us know. ^_^ [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | :Got it. Thanks for letting us know. ^_^ [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|happytext=Don't mention it. Oh, thank goodness it's gone !}} | ||
==Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth== | ==Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=The two articles are stubs, and the two enemies are palette swaps of the original [[Behemoth]]. Methinks they should be removed and fused with the original Behemoth, and their appearances should be listed there as well. Just like we did for Rune Master and all those other palette-swap Final Mix enemies. What do you think ?}} | ||
If that's the case, definitely. I'd only make another page if the stats and abilities were different. A redirect from Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth would be a good idea, too. [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 21:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | If that's the case, definitely. I'd only make another page if the stats and abilities were different. A redirect from Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth would be a good idea, too. [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 21:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=I don't agree with this. Destroyed Behemoth and Arch Behemoth are still different enemies, they've been given their own titles in the journal, and our manual of style states that '''every''' enemy gets it's own article. Just because they look similar doesn't change the fact that they're different enemies, if that were the case, you might as well merge Red Nocturne, Blue Rhapsody, ect. together. Those two Behemoth pages just need a little work.}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=I don't agree with this. Destroyed Behemoth and Arch Behemoth are still different enemies, they've been given their own titles in the journal, and our manual of style states that '''every''' enemy gets it's own article. Just because they look similar doesn't change the fact that they're different enemies, if that were the case, you might as well merge Red Nocturne, Blue Rhapsody, ect. together. Those two Behemoth pages just need a little work.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Come to think of it, the Rune Master and the Bookmaster are two different Heartless too. Spring Metal and Emerald Blues are different. But what can unite them in one page is their fighting style. Thing about Arch Behemoth, Destroyed Behemoth and the real deal is this - their fighting style is no different (even if there's no proper sequence to their attacks). Maybe the only thing that differs is the amount of experience gained from each boss, but honestly, what can we talk about for Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth ? | ||
Of course, you can't do the same for Red Nocturne/Blue Rhapsody because of their different element '''and''' fighting style. Same goes for Crimson Jazz/Emerald Blues. But ultimately, we've gotta combine enemies with the same moves in the same page, don't you think ? | Of course, you can't do the same for Red Nocturne/Blue Rhapsody because of their different element '''and''' fighting style. Same goes for Crimson Jazz/Emerald Blues. But ultimately, we've gotta combine enemies with the same moves in the same page, don't you think ? | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=Well, I suppose you can just add them to the Behemoth page, but I think that if we're going to do that, then there are some other similar enemies that should be grouped together.}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=Well, I suppose you can just add them to the Behemoth page, but I think that if we're going to do that, then there are some other similar enemies that should be grouped together.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=If there's an evident difference in fighting style between two similar-looking enemies, then they should have their separate pages. Palette swaps should be combined. Or at least, I'm upholding that view. The same goes for [[Trick Ghost]] and [[Magic Ghost]], their pages can be combined into one.}} | ||
::As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first? | ::As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first? | ||
::A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like [http://digimon.wikia.com/wiki/Agumon this one], each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be on one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest [[Behemoth Heartless]], [[Wizard Heartless]] (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), [[Soldier Heartless]], [[Mushroom Heartless]], etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could | ::A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like [http://digimon.wikia.com/wiki/Agumon this one], each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be on one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest [[Behemoth Heartless]], [[Wizard Heartless]] (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), [[Soldier Heartless]], [[Mushroom Heartless]], etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
::Really, the only problem with this approach is determining the name of the merged article, but that shouldn't be too hard.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>survived intact.</small>]] 20:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Really, the only problem with this approach is determining the name of the merged article, but that shouldn't be too hard.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>survived intact.</small>]] 20:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=So, that means we group Heartless of similar "species" into one article ? Sounds good to me.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=I've placed the info on Arch and Destroyed Behemoths on the parent article (Behemoth). Now, all I need is for someone to make the article more presentable. There are pictures all over the place. | ||
EDIT : KrytenKoro and I gathered all the Behemoth info on one page. Think we should remove the separate pages for Arc and Destroyed Behemoths, and redirect them ?}} | EDIT : KrytenKoro and I gathered all the Behemoth info on one page. Think we should remove the separate pages for Arc and Destroyed Behemoths, and redirect them ?}} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|Do we have the go ahead to do this with other groups of "same-species" Heartless, like the mages or mushrooms?}} | {{KrytenKoro|Do we have the go ahead to do this with other groups of "same-species" Heartless, like the mages or mushrooms?}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Methinks it'd depend on the fighting style.}} | ||
==[[Cerberus (Enemy)]]== | ==[[Cerberus (Enemy)]]== | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=Cerberus never actually communicates with Sora verbally, so his main page can also be considered his enemy page. We don't really need an enemy version if we can include everything on the main article.}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=Cerberus never actually communicates with Sora verbally, so his main page can also be considered his enemy page. We don't really need an enemy version if we can include everything on the main article.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Hm. Moving all the strategy info to the main page sounds good.}} | ||
{{BebopKate|text=I want some thoughts on this, since Cerberus isn't the only character with this issue. For established characters that don't do much other than serve as a battle (Cerberus, Hydra, etc), do we really need a separate enemy page? Anyone else want to say their piece?}} | {{BebopKate|text=I want some thoughts on this, since Cerberus isn't the only character with this issue. For established characters that don't do much other than serve as a battle (Cerberus, Hydra, etc), do we really need a separate enemy page? Anyone else want to say their piece?}} | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=That's pretty much how it's already being handled. Chernabog, Ice Titan, Rock Titan, Sabor, all of their strategies are on their main pages. The only characters who should have enemy articles are the ones who actually communicate and have a part in the plot besides serving as a boss fight. I fixed the Hydra article btw, so the Hydra (Enemy) article can be deleted too.}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=That's pretty much how it's already being handled. Chernabog, Ice Titan, Rock Titan, Sabor, all of their strategies are on their main pages. The only characters who should have enemy articles are the ones who actually communicate and have a part in the plot besides serving as a boss fight. I fixed the Hydra article btw, so the Hydra (Enemy) article can be deleted too.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Fair enough. Proceed. Related vids can also be shifted to the character pages.}} | ||
{{BebopKate|text=Done and done. Thank you for fixing the Hydra article, Guardian Soul. ^_^}} | {{BebopKate|text=Done and done. Thank you for fixing the Hydra article, Guardian Soul. ^_^}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Thankies. :)}} | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=:]}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=:]}} | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
==[[Detection Saber]]== | ==[[Detection Saber]]== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Firstly, it was removed from the game. Secondly, it's a palette swap of Ultima Weapon. And thirdly, there isn't any picture for it in the menu - the only thing we can see is a map icon ! | ||
Think we should have this page removed and transfer all the info in it to its parent article, [[Ultima Weapon]] ?}} | Think we should have this page removed and transfer all the info in it to its parent article, [[Ultima Weapon]] ?}} | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
==The language-0 templates== | ==The language-0 templates== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=I had a talk with Xiggie and Xahno yesterday and we were thinking : since this is an English wiki, then the only language-0 template we need is '''en-0''' (that too, after someone helps us to deal with it !). If we don't speak '''(insert random language here)''' then we don't indicate anything, do we ? | ||
So I think we should remove the '''fr-0''', '''ja-0''' and '''is-0''' templates. What say you ?}} | So I think we should remove the '''fr-0''', '''ja-0''' and '''is-0''' templates. What say you ?}} | ||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
==[[Arch Wyvern]]== | ==[[Arch Wyvern]]== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=It's one of the stubbiest articles ever. And plus, it's the only variant of Wyvern in Kingdom Hearts: Final Mix. So both the Wyvern and the Arch Wyvern have the same moveset, bu the Arch Wyvern is a palette swap of the former. | ||
Think we should have that article removed and all the info transferred to [[Wyvern]] ?}} | Think we should have that article removed and all the info transferred to [[Wyvern]] ?}} | ||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
{{ShadowXemnas|text=Sounds like a good idea. I think that the picture of the Arch Wyvern should be included in the section where it will be mentioned, so that those who haven't seen one before will know what it looks like (I'm having this same problem with the Necromancer, the more powerful form of Shaman Heartless).}} | {{ShadowXemnas|text=Sounds like a good idea. I think that the picture of the Arch Wyvern should be included in the section where it will be mentioned, so that those who haven't seen one before will know what it looks like (I'm having this same problem with the Necromancer, the more powerful form of Shaman Heartless).}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=I have a feeling this talk about Heartless and their Final Mix counterparts isn't gonna end. Not very long ago I posted something about the Behemoths and their variants. Now I get the same problem with the Wyverns. Why all the clutter...}} | ||
{{BebopKate|text=Indeed, the entire Behemoth Conundrum issue above. I recall we decided to merge palette variations in with their originals, in spite of the different names. If someone will slide this info into Wyvern, I'll come back and redirect this one.}} | {{BebopKate|text=Indeed, the entire Behemoth Conundrum issue above. I recall we decided to merge palette variations in with their originals, in spite of the different names. If someone will slide this info into Wyvern, I'll come back and redirect this one.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=I've just managed to slide the info on Arch Wyvern into its parent article (Wyvern). I've even placed the picture - only need someone to make it more presentable.}} | ||
{{BebopKate|text=Thank you. ^_^ '''Deleted'''.}} | {{BebopKate|text=Thank you. ^_^ '''Deleted'''.}} | ||
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
==[[Plane Crazy]]== | ==[[Plane Crazy]]== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=An unknown IP created this. Worse still, it hasn't got any content in it. Please do take it off. Thanks. ^_^}} | ||
Yup. Not needed; a Wikipedia link would work just fine anyway. '''Deleted''' [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 22:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | Yup. Not needed; a Wikipedia link would work just fine anyway. '''Deleted''' [[User:BebopKate|BebopKate]] 22:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
==[[Sora & Kairi's kiss]] ?== | ==[[Sora & Kairi's kiss]] ?== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|shocktext=We are all skeptical over the originality of that image. Also, nothing official's been said by Nomura about this. The way the article's written (it's stubby too !) - it kinda tells me some SoraxKairi-crazed anonymous would've done this. Think we should have it removed ?}} | ||
{{Guardian Soul|text=Yeah, the image is an obvious shop.}} | {{Guardian Soul|text=Yeah, the image is an obvious shop.}} | ||
Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
==There's a page called Category:Secret drive form== | ==There's a page called Category:Secret drive form== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Despite it being poorly written, I think I get what that user's trying to say, and methinks the info should be pushed over to the Trivia section in [[Valor Form]]. Again, think we should have this page removed ? | ||
It was posted by an unknown IP add, and this guy just added the category over there, but I removed it.}} | It was posted by an unknown IP add, and this guy just added the category over there, but I removed it.}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Okay, just so you'd know where the link to that "category" page is, here it is : [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Secret_drive_form Secret Drive Form]. Alright, what we need now is to transfer all the info here into [[Drive Form]]. Any objections, guys ?}} | ||
{{Xiggie|text=nah... go ahed. | {{Xiggie|text=nah... go ahed. | ||
from what I see there, it is not only for Valor form, and it isn't a special secret form, like it says in the trivia section now, it is just a cheatcode that makes all the drives green (instead of red, blue, yellow and silver).}} | from what I see there, it is not only for Valor form, and it isn't a special secret form, like it says in the trivia section now, it is just a cheatcode that makes all the drives green (instead of red, blue, yellow and silver).}} | ||
{{ | {{TNE|text=Oh. Okay. (I mean, this one was poorly written that I couldn't make out whether it was a locked-away drive form or just a palette swap of all the drives in the disc.)}} | ||
==[[Xevents]]== | ==[[Xevents]]== | ||
{{ | {{TNE|shocktext=Dang, we've been having too many people filling the Wiki with unnecessary pages of late.}} | ||
{{BebopKate|text='''Deleted'''. Meh, it's all part of the fun. ^_-}} | {{BebopKate|text='''Deleted'''. Meh, it's all part of the fun. ^_-}} | ||
[[Category:Archives]] | [[Category:Archives]] |
Revision as of 06:37, 7 April 2009
This is an archive page for deletion discussions on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki for January, February, and March of 2009. These discussions are considered closed. Please bring up any further issues on the current deletions page.
Disorganizationxiii
I think Disorganizationxiii needs to be Deletion. its fan stuff. so I'll leave you guys to remove itEliskuya2 17:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I object. It's really the best out of all parodies out there and clearly deserves it's own wiki. It's not really fan stuff. If it were fan stuff, it would just be somebody saying, "I LOVE ORGANIZATION XIII!" or just put random pics and facts about kingdom hearts on the page. It's an official series taht should be kept here. Please. I worked forever on that page.
- We don't do fan works here, unless it's on a user page. And even then, we're not big fans of shameless self-promotion. Deleted. BebopKate 02:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
well its up again bebop can we just block things like thatEliskuya2 04:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
|
they need to make a wiki for all fan things and ect. and I hope this time it gets deletionEliskuya2 04:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
|
yeah let my friend bebop duel with it. and troisnyxetienne come to my page if you need some hints on KHEliskuya2 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
XienZo got it the other two times. Protected now, and if it somehow reappears, the poster is banned. BebopKate 02:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
if I see a other I well late you guys duel with it peaceEliskuya2 02:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
|
- Today. It's protected, so we should be fine for now. BebopKate 04:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
its back and I find who makes the thing its DISORGANIZATIONXIIILOVER Eliskuya2 21:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
|
I am with you troisnyxetEliskuya2 05:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
He's posting under multiple IPs, so we can only ban the IPs he posts under and block the article names. If this continues, I will alert the Wikia admins to help us out. In the meantime, just post here to let XienZo or me know to delete and keep wiking away as normal. I have also alerted the Disorganization XIII people to keep our bases covered. Just console yourself that you have more of a life than this guy does. ^_^ BebopKate 05:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
|
I think if I see a other again block the user and the site to the "Disorganizationxiii" thing as well and good night brother Bebop and sister TroisnyxeEliskuya2 11:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Only admins have the power to block users, so right now it's mostly me and XienZo doing the job. And we can only block them if they have one IP address or a username. If they are posting from multiple IPs like some of our more famous past trolls have done, there's really nothing we can do other than block the IPs they are using and protect the pages. Wikia is working on a way to block people who abuse IPs, but it's a long way off in getting done. The only thing we can do at the moment is what we've been doing: revert, protect, and ban. For the record, I think you guys are doing a wonderful job of fixing and keeping up with these things; it's been a huge help to me and XienZo. Just be patient and understand that with the good of the wiki (free editing) comes the bad (vandalizing jerks and trolls).
By the way, I feel this needs to be said: DO NOT SPAM OR DOWNVOTE THE DISORGANIZATION XIII YOUTUBE CHANNEL! The people behind it are not the ones who are doing this; I have been in contact with them. It is one of their fans. They are looking around on their end and have made it clear they are not any happier about it than we are, and have apologized for it. I hope whoever has been doing this realizes the potential damage he or she is doing to something they apparently enjoy. BebopKate 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
|
There's a page called TroisNyxEtienneText, under templates
|
- Got it. Thanks for letting us know. ^_^ BebopKate 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth
|
If that's the case, definitely. I'd only make another page if the stats and abilities were different. A redirect from Arch Behemoth and Destroyed Behemoth would be a good idea, too. BebopKate 21:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
- As of now, the Behemoth article does not mention Arc or Destroyed Behemoth's at all, and in fact incorrectly reports that regular Behemoth's were seen in the 1000 Heartless battle. Before any deletions occur, how about the sections be merged first?
- A the Digimon Wiki, we've had a similar problem, and we've dealt with it with a middle ground between the two positions advocated here. As seen in articles like this one, each version of a "type" of enemy is given a section in the page - kind of like a list article. This method could also be applied to Red Nocturne types, so that there's not too much hair-splitting and argumentation - all of that "type" of enemy is in one article, but each gets its own section. So, Soldiers and Stealth Soldiers would be on one page, all five types of mushrooms, etc. The only problem then is figuring out a name for the entire article - I would suggest Behemoth Heartless, Wizard Heartless (as the rhapsodies/nocturnes are all said to be a subset of Wizard class), Soldier Heartless, Mushroom Heartless, etc. (or some version of that naming scheme). This way, you could
- Get rid of short, stubby articles, by changing them into short sections of a larger page
- Allow readers to directly and easily compare variations of a central theme
- Allow editors to see how the other sections are formatted, allowing for greater unity of article design between similar enemies.
- Really, the only problem with this approach is determining the name of the merged article, but that shouldn't be too hard.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 20:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
Cerberus (Enemy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narnia
|
ED Pills
|
Template:Radiant Garden
|
Images
All of the images listed for deletion are superseded files that have been replaced with cleaner images and standardized names. Please delete them.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 23:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Detection Saber
|
|
Agreed. Deleted. BebopKate 01:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The language-0 templates
|
|
Arch Wyvern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heart of destany
|
Sigh...not him again. Deleted BebopKate 22:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Plane Crazy
|
Yup. Not needed; a Wikipedia link would work just fine anyway. Deleted BebopKate 22:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Category:Weapon Card Images
|
|
Sora & Kairi's kiss ?
|
|
Image and article Deleted. BebopKate 01:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
There's a page called Category:Secret drive form
|
|
|
|
Xevents
|
|