Talk:Ultima Weapon: Difference between revisions
(add+) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:The "symbolism" is entirely speculation. Beyond the most obvious, such as the Greek theme to the Olympus Keyblades, saying things like "the heart in this Keyblade represents the time Sora became a Heartless" is silly and grasping at straws. If there's something to be said about the appearance, then it shouldn't be two paragraphs and given its own section. [[User:Interobangu|Interobangu]] 04:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | :The "symbolism" is entirely speculation. Beyond the most obvious, such as the Greek theme to the Olympus Keyblades, saying things like "the heart in this Keyblade represents the time Sora became a Heartless" is silly and grasping at straws. If there's something to be said about the appearance, then it shouldn't be two paragraphs and given its own section. [[User:Interobangu|Interobangu]] 04:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::The "Appearance" section is standard for all keyblades. Maybe the description was a bit lengthy, but it's not really affecting or taking away from the article. Sometimes, the wiki acts up and the images don't show (for some, at least), so the description is the only way someone can identify it. I say it should be restored and shortened. -[[User:Azul81677|<font color="#4682B4">Azul</font>]] <sup><small>('''''[[User talk:Azul81677|talk]] ・[[Special:Contributions/Azul81677|contribs]]''''')</small></sup> 00:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ::The "Appearance" section is standard for all keyblades. Maybe the description was a bit lengthy, but it's not really affecting or taking away from the article. Sometimes, the wiki acts up and the images don't show (for some, at least), so the description is the only way someone can identify it. I say it should be restored and shortened. -[[User:Azul81677|<font color="#4682B4">Azul</font>]] <sup><small>('''''[[User talk:Azul81677|talk]] ・[[Special:Contributions/Azul81677|contribs]]''''')</small></sup> 00:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== 7 vs. 13 == | |||
{{EO|time=01:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)|talktext=While the recipe for Ultima Weapon in KH2 requires 13 Oricalchum+, I got it before fighting Sephiroth as a precaution with only 7? Why was this? An error? I don't think the actual article needs to be changed...I just want to see if the reason I believe this is so is correct...}} |
Revision as of 01:24, 14 August 2009
I think we should add in wich world you can get each keyblade for the first time in KH: CoM Pablo618 00:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- That was kind of the point of the "description" tab (to write the description given in the game, which includes that bit of information), as seen here. --Hecko X 01:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm asking this because I'm already at hollow bastion in CoM so I want to have it to kill everything that puts on my way Pablo618 01:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- The description is followed with the journal's record, and as to obtain the UW, you have to finish reverse rebirth, re-load Sora's game, and find it in the Moogle Shop(random) or Random key to rewards in Castle Oblivion--N/A
- -.- well thanks anyways. Pablo618 14:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Undid vandalism- Sora G. Strife 06:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Synthesis ?
|
|
|
Similarity?
|
|
- The recipe for Ultima Weapon in KHII is wrong - it only requires one Orihalcum.
Appearance
|
Even if the image is right there, like Kryten said, Keyblades have details that not always are visible at first sight. I, for example, are the type of person to pass by that kind of details. I'd rather have the description paragraph to emphisize those little details. --—YerMom is feeling jolly 02:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- The "symbolism" is entirely speculation. Beyond the most obvious, such as the Greek theme to the Olympus Keyblades, saying things like "the heart in this Keyblade represents the time Sora became a Heartless" is silly and grasping at straws. If there's something to be said about the appearance, then it shouldn't be two paragraphs and given its own section. Interobangu 04:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- The "Appearance" section is standard for all keyblades. Maybe the description was a bit lengthy, but it's not really affecting or taking away from the article. Sometimes, the wiki acts up and the images don't show (for some, at least), so the description is the only way someone can identify it. I say it should be restored and shortened. -Azul (talk ・contribs) 00:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
7 vs. 13
|