KHWiki talk:Manual of Style: Difference between revisions
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
P.S. If you ask me, I prefer the Queen's English anyday. ;-)}} | P.S. If you ask me, I prefer the Queen's English anyday. ;-)}} | ||
{{TNE|text=Another thing I almost forgot, in light of what Mar1 did to the Caterpillar page : | |||
==Deleted/previously deleted articles== | |||
*(Deleted articles should never be revived on the Wiki until and unless there is enough information to substantiate it. If an article is too stubby and should be merged with another, the Merge template should be used.) The remaining articles (which are remnants of the merger) should be marked with the Delete template. | |||
*(If an article was created or revived in bad faith and has little or nothing to do with the Kingdom Hearts universe, use the Delete template.) | |||
*(All discussions about articles for deletion should take place in [[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Pages for Deletion]] and not on the talk pages of the marked articles.)}} |
Revision as of 03:43, 18 April 2009
Important Discussion!
I'm opening this discussion to all editors!! THe Manual of Style needs your input, good sirs and madams.
A question by NeloAngelo: Should we separate enemy pages or should the battle strategy be put in the same page. I've answered this questions before but he still asks so I'm opening this discussion. The MoS needs more input anyway.
Suggestions? Blue。 10:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Like I said on his talkpage yes. A page for strategies (I hope I spelled that right) would look really clutterd since there are many ways in defeating a boss. -Azul 10:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Should the enemies’ journal entries be italicized? —Shidou 02:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, to symbolize it being an in-game description. Blue。 02:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Because journal entries for characters change over the course of the game, is there a specification for which point in the game the entries should come from? —Shidou 16:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- All of them (if possible). --Hecko X 17:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Should the subject of enemy articles be singular or plural? If singular, should they start with a definite or indefinite article? —Shidou 18:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hard to say without trying out a layout, since I have absolutely no idea of how much information it would be. So I suggest making a sandbox, experiment, and when you/we find a setup that works, go with it. As for your second question, I'm sad to say I don't quite follow your train of thought. Could you possibly use an example to clarify? --Hecko X 18:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Stick to singular. And omit the "the" or "a/an". I already said something about that in the style page? Blue。 19:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but you specified it for article titles, not the body. Example of plural, indefinite articles and definite articles. —Shidou 19:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Use the definite article for the intro sentence. e.g "The Neo Shadow is a Heartless". The rest then is up to the writer, use as according to the sentence structure and the message to convey. Blue。 19:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but you specified it for article titles, not the body. Example of plural, indefinite articles and definite articles. —Shidou 19:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Stick to singular. And omit the "the" or "a/an". I already said something about that in the style page? Blue。 19:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Should second-person pronouns generally be avoided (with quotes being one of the exceptions)? If so, what should be used in its place (e.g. the player, Sora)? —Shidou 21:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good question. Second person should be avoided. Use, the player for gameplay articles, and third person or character name for character and storyline pages. Blue。 21:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strategies are also exceptions to the rule. --Hecko X 21:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Overlinking
Rather than limiting a wikilink to its first occurrence in the article, how about a maximum of one per section? Pages can link to a particular section and clicking on the table contents may skip sections, so the extra links could still be the first that the reader comes across. —Shidou 03:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- We could adopt the Wikipedia approach to internal linking, and say as long as it doesn't occur too many times. I know that is vague, but I think as long as common sense can accept then it's fine. Blue。 08:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Videos
I recommend placing videos in tables. Makes the pages more organized. Blue。 18:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Tense
What is the KH Wiki policy on tense? I often want to use past tense when describing events, but many articles are in present tense. Ex. "Sora received the Keyblade in Destiny Islands" Vs. "Sora receives the Keyblade in Desitny Islands." Both are plausible, but it would be confusing if we dont stay the same throughout. Also, Axel's page for example begins with "Axel IS the 8th member of the orginaztion" despite the fact that hes dead. So are we talking about characters as if the events of KH2 have happened and are over? or are we talking about them as if we are currently playing through the game and the action is "happening" in front of you? Thanks.--Zephyrus11 23:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- The Last one. As if the game is happening in front of you. Although, if you are talking about something in KHII and reference something from KH of KH:CoM then that wouls be past tense. The Axel thing, "Axel IS the 8th member of the organization" is right-Azul 03:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, Thank you. --Zephyrus11 03:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Review of the Manual of Style
|
|
|
|