Talk:Ephemer

Line 26:

::::You're over-reacting, so please calm down. I'm just stating my opinion, and that's it. I'm not "pushing" my opinion on anyone. If the wiki wants to use it, that's on you guys. I'm not outright declaring we should take it off, but simply saying that I, a user who edits here, have concerns on whether or not using a tweet, which the VA himself deleted because that's the law in accordance with his NDA contact, on the wiki is really all right. Legally, Mr. Johnston should not done that in the first place, so he deleted it because he didn't want to violate his contract and revealed to the public that's he voicing Ephemera.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

:::::There's no such thing as a "head admin". {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 20:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

::::::For future reference -- the cite that was on the page was one in which Johnston ''merely retweeted'' someone asking if he voiced Ephemera (and relevantly, this link shows several confused twitterati asking "wait, is this actually confirmation?"). At no point did the anon link the archived tweet in which Johnston actually makes the confirmation. Ninja voiced her confusion at using the tweet as a cite, pointing out that the ''current'' tweet makes no statement either way. The only reason the article is currently noting Johnston as the VA is because I ''personally happened to be aware of the deleted tweet that the anon was obliquely referencing but neglecting to provide'', '''not''' because I am a "head admin".

::::::Anon: You've been blocked for repeated personal attacks after I ''already let you know'' that wouldn't be acceptable. If you come back once your block is done, ''provide citations first''. This has been a repeated issue in the last few days, leading to completely needless edit wars.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Ephemer: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Community

Tools

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ::::You're over-reacting, so please calm down. I'm just stating my opinion, and that's it. I'm not "pushing" my opinion on anyone. If the wiki wants to use it, that's on you guys. I'm not outright declaring we should take it off, but simply saying that I, a user who edits here, have concerns on whether or not using a tweet, which the VA himself deleted because that's the law in accordance with his NDA contact, on the wiki is really all right. Legally, Mr. Johnston should not done that in the first place, so he deleted it because he didn't want to violate his contract and revealed to the public that's he voicing Ephemera.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 :::::There's no such thing as a "head admin". {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 20:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
+::::::For future reference -- the cite that was on the page was one in which Johnston ''merely retweeted'' someone asking if he voiced Ephemera (and relevantly, this link shows several confused twitterati asking "wait, is this actually confirmation?"). At no point did the anon link the archived tweet in which Johnston actually makes the confirmation. Ninja voiced her confusion at using the tweet as a cite, pointing out that the ''current'' tweet makes no statement either way. The only reason the article is currently noting Johnston as the VA is because I ''personally happened to be aware of the deleted tweet that the anon was obliquely referencing but neglecting to provide'', '''not''' because I am a "head admin".
+::::::Anon: You've been blocked for repeated personal attacks after I ''already let you know'' that wouldn't be acceptable. If you come back once your block is done, ''provide citations first''. This has been a repeated issue in the last few days, leading to completely needless edit wars.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)