|
|
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
|
| |
|
| '''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>''' | | '''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>''' |
| The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all Featured Articles should follow the manual of style, be written well, and not have any maintenance issues. You can see a missing <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tag in the bottom of the page, was that not obvious enough? | | The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all featured articles should follow the manual of style, be written well, and not have any maintenance issues. You can see a missing <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tag in the bottom of the page, was that not obvious enough? |
|
| |
|
| But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October. | | But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October. |
Line 101: |
Line 101: |
| {{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote. The [[KHWiki:Mirage Arena|Mirage Arena]] is a great example of that, and I have to say [[KHWiki:Votes for featured media|featured media]] has exceeded everyone's expectations, methinks. | | {{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote. The [[KHWiki:Mirage Arena|Mirage Arena]] is a great example of that, and I have to say [[KHWiki:Votes for featured media|featured media]] has exceeded everyone's expectations, methinks. |
|
| |
|
| We've improved in quality overall since we stopped Featured Articles, and even more so since we've re-added them as staff only. I think we have a lot more wiki members who know what quality means and are willing to help and polish something so it's at its best. | | We've improved in quality overall since we stopped featured articles, and even more so since we've re-added them as staff only. I think we have a lot more wiki members who know what quality means and are willing to help and polish something so it's at its best. |
|
| |
|
| Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return Featured Articles to the hands of all the editors. I do think we should use the same system as featured media (restrained categories), as that has worked very well in producing a wide range of winners, and perhaps borrow and modify a couple of guidelines from FF Wiki's procedures, such as so many nominees before voting starts. If need be, we can re-tool things as we go along to make it work more smoothly, but I think this is a step we should take. | | Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return featured articles to the hands of all the editors. I do think we should use the same system as featured media (restrained categories), as that has worked very well in producing a wide range of winners, and perhaps borrow and modify a couple of guidelines from FF Wiki's procedures, such as so many nominees before voting starts. If need be, we can re-tool things as we go along to make it work more smoothly, but I think this is a step we should take. |
|
| |
|
| What say you, fellow staffers? ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}} | | What say you, fellow staffers? ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}} |