Talk:Reaction Boost: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is meant by "power"?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC) | What is meant by "power"?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
::The original description of the ability was this: "It increases the amount of damage done from [[Reaction Commands]] by 50%." I wanted to change that to "It increases the amount of damage dealt by [[Reaction Commands]] by 50%" for greater sound appeal, but this is redundant-sounding thanks to the "by 50%." I rephrased "damage dealt by," so power essentially is intended to mean the same thing. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 22:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC) | ::The original description of the ability was this: "It increases the amount of damage done from [[Reaction Commands]] by 50%." I wanted to change that to "It increases the amount of damage dealt by [[Reaction Commands]] by 50%" for greater sound appeal, but this is redundant-sounding thanks to the "by 50%." I rephrased "damage dealt by," so power essentially is intended to mean the same thing. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 22:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
::Thing is, there are reaction commands that don't deal damage, so it's not clear if you just call it "power". I'm not sure why sticking to the official description would be reudndant, since it's not clarified in a mechanics section.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::What if we said "the effectiveness of Reaction Commands?" You've sort of turned me into someone who is against the use of in-game flavor text in our articles. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 03:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Why not just go with "it increases the power dealt by ''damage-dealing'' Reaction Commands by 50%" (emphasis mine, and by damage I mean HP)? As far as I can tell, it doesn't confer any special effect on non-damage dealing RCs. [[User:Ultima Spark|<span style="color:#002395 ;">Ultima Spark</span>]] ''[[User talk:Ultima Spark|<span style="color:#007FFF ;">(talk)</span>]]'' [[File:Lofty Fantasy KH3D.png|17px]] 04:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::They don't deal power, though. I'm saying, I see nothing wrong with simply stating "it increases the damage dealt by Reaction Commands by 50%" -- it's accurate, it doesn't beat around the bush, and I don't see how it's redundant.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:14, 19 February 2015
What is meant by "power"?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 22:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- The original description of the ability was this: "It increases the amount of damage done from Reaction Commands by 50%." I wanted to change that to "It increases the amount of damage dealt by Reaction Commands by 50%" for greater sound appeal, but this is redundant-sounding thanks to the "by 50%." I rephrased "damage dealt by," so power essentially is intended to mean the same thing. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 22:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thing is, there are reaction commands that don't deal damage, so it's not clear if you just call it "power". I'm not sure why sticking to the official description would be reudndant, since it's not clarified in a mechanics section."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- What if we said "the effectiveness of Reaction Commands?" You've sort of turned me into someone who is against the use of in-game flavor text in our articles. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 03:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Why not just go with "it increases the power dealt by damage-dealing Reaction Commands by 50%" (emphasis mine, and by damage I mean HP)? As far as I can tell, it doesn't confer any special effect on non-damage dealing RCs. Ultima Spark (talk) 04:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- They don't deal power, though. I'm saying, I see nothing wrong with simply stating "it increases the damage dealt by Reaction Commands by 50%" -- it's accurate, it doesn't beat around the bush, and I don't see how it's redundant."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 14:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Why not just go with "it increases the power dealt by damage-dealing Reaction Commands by 50%" (emphasis mine, and by damage I mean HP)? As far as I can tell, it doesn't confer any special effect on non-damage dealing RCs. Ultima Spark (talk) 04:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)