User talk:173.167.179.77: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "[[Kingdom Hearts Wiki:" to "[[KHWiki:") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Please== | ==Please== | ||
{{Uxie|time=19:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)|luna=I'm being nice, but at the same time telling you to avoid putting ideals into our pages. You should read [[ | {{Uxie|time=19:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)|luna=I'm being nice, but at the same time telling you to avoid putting ideals into our pages. You should read [[KHWiki:Manual of Style|our manual of style]] to see what style we want this place to be in. If you keep on putting in ideals and other nonsence into our pages, you might get a warning. That is all.}} | ||
{{Warning|reason=[http://www.khwiki.net/index.php?title=Ansem,_Seeker_of_Darkness&curid=7061&diff=560416&oldid=559777 this edit]|[[User:UxieLover1994|UxieLover1994]] 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)}} | {{Warning|reason=[http://www.khwiki.net/index.php?title=Ansem,_Seeker_of_Darkness&curid=7061&diff=560416&oldid=559777 this edit]|[[User:UxieLover1994|UxieLover1994]] 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Thank you.}} | Thank you.}} | ||
==Warning + week-long block== | |||
{{warning|reason=repeated unproductive edits; ignoring messages|{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 22:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
I'm blocking you from editing for a week. Please rethink your editing habits in the meantime. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 22:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
::THANK YOU, GOD NEUMANNZ~!! :) I was about to post a warning, too, but I got an Edit Conflict and saw you posted and saved before I did. Well, the anon is block and a week to think of his/her actions. So, that's good. Speaking of which, User: 173.167.179.77, please read up on the rules and quit with the commentary in the articles before your week-long block is over.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 22:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 10 February 2021
|
Speculation[edit]
If you'd like to discuss theories, please use the Forums or the theoryspace at The Keyhole. However, there should not be any speculation inserted into the articles. Thanks!192.249.47.177 14:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Scripts[edit]
Unlike some wikis, we prefer the plot synopsis to be a synopsis of the scene that helps a reader to understand its import, not the direct script. Please do not convert the synopses into straight "he said, then she said", okay?192.249.47.177 21:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Please[edit]
|
I'm not laughing!
| |
This is a warning for this edit.
Your edits have been reverted; please do not attempt to repeat them. — UxieLover1994 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC) |
I tried to warn you before, but you didn't hear my call. UxieLover1994 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Spoiler[edit]
|
Please start using the talk pages instead of editing articles[edit]
I appreciate that you are trying to add to the wiki and correct factual statements, but your writing is simply too rife with spelling and grammar errors to be posted to the article. Instead, you should create a topic on the article's talk page where you post your version of the page, and if you can, highlight the parts that are correcting factual errors. That way, other editors have time to review your edits and clean them up before they're posted to the article.
If you just keep on editing the articles with the quality you've been using, your edits will be immediately reverted."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 21:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- I also suggest that you read up on the rules, considering you question why we put Spoilers tags are there. Even though the game is out, Spoiler tags are added into articles to, well, warn viewers that haven't played the game yet to look out for them. Not everyone likes spoilers.--NinjaSheik 00:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
|
Warning + week-long block[edit]
I'm not laughing!
| |
This is a warning for repeated unproductive edits; ignoring messages.
Your edits have been reverted; please do not attempt to repeat them. — Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
I'm blocking you from editing for a week. Please rethink your editing habits in the meantime. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- THANK YOU, GOD NEUMANNZ~!! :) I was about to post a warning, too, but I got an Edit Conflict and saw you posted and saved before I did. Well, the anon is block and a week to think of his/her actions. So, that's good. Speaking of which, User: 173.167.179.77, please read up on the rules and quit with the commentary in the articles before your week-long block is over.--NinjaSheik 22:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)