KHWiki:Votes for featured articles/2010: Difference between revisions
(Archiving) |
m (Porplemontage moved page KHWiki:Votes for featured articles/Archive 2 to KHWiki:Votes for featured articles/2010) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | {{FANav}} | ||
This page serves as an archive for past [[ | This page serves as an archive for past [[KHWiki:Votes for featured articles|votes for featured articles]] discussions. | ||
== December 2010 == | == December 2010 == | ||
Line 32: | Line 26: | ||
'''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>''' | '''<center><big><big><big> <big><big><big>BIG MISTAKE</big></big></big> </big></big></big></center>''' | ||
The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all | The article is still very messy and is not completely consistent with the format of our other game articles. Also, whoever nominated and supported this seemed to forget that all featured articles should follow the manual of style, be written well, and not have any maintenance issues. You can see a missing <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tag in the bottom of the page, was that not obvious enough? | ||
But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October. | But I digress. [[100 Acre Wood]] is the only quality article that comes to mind right now for October. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
EDIT: This is not to be taken offensively, but just to remind all of the staffers that an article should be thoroughly inspected before being nominated, and not to just nominate an article because it fits into the time frame. Thanks!}} | EDIT: This is not to be taken offensively, but just to remind all of the staffers that an article should be thoroughly inspected before being nominated, and not to just nominate an article because it fits into the time frame. Thanks!}} | ||
{{EO|time=19:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)|annoyed=The only reason you think [[100 Acre Wood]] is such a masterpiece is because YOU revised it, DTN. That's not a fair enough judgment/reason to nominate an article. ''Birth by Sleep'' was elected to sort of tie-in to the | {{EO|time=19:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)|annoyed=The only reason you think [[100 Acre Wood]] is such a masterpiece is because YOU revised it, DTN. That's not a fair enough judgment/reason to nominate an article. ''Birth by Sleep'' was elected to sort of tie-in to the wiki's theme and also encourage users to edit the article, as well as articles based on it with the new information the English adaptions revealed. | ||
I'd say, in the spirit of Halloween being in October, the stereotypical thing to do would be nominate a Halloween-based article, so we at least acknowledge it in some way, even though switching to a temporary Halloween theme is completely pointless. So I'd like to nominate [[Halloween Town]], simply on the grounds that it's based on the best stop-motion film of all time, has appeared in almost every game, has a great storyline, and makes the Heartless encountered there look totally awesome! Granted it could still use some work, that can all be changed in time.}} | I'd say, in the spirit of Halloween being in October, the stereotypical thing to do would be nominate a Halloween-based article, so we at least acknowledge it in some way, even though switching to a temporary Halloween theme is completely pointless. So I'd like to nominate [[Halloween Town]], simply on the grounds that it's based on the best stop-motion film of all time, has appeared in almost every game, has a great storyline, and makes the Heartless encountered there look totally awesome! Granted it could still use some work, that can all be changed in time.}} | ||
Line 50: | Line 44: | ||
Given the direction of where this is going, I'm going to flat out say I'm not going to be the sole decision maker here. I want to hear from other staff members. We've got them and we need more input from them as well. We'll delay the vote until Monday to make a final decision.}} | Given the direction of where this is going, I'm going to flat out say I'm not going to be the sole decision maker here. I want to hear from other staff members. We've got them and we need more input from them as well. We'll delay the vote until Monday to make a final decision.}} | ||
{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=What about [[Olympus Coliseum]]? It has appeared in every | {{Chihuahuaman|time=22:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=What about [[Olympus Coliseum]]? It has appeared in every {{c|Kingdom Hearts|series}} game and it offers a challenge everytime.}} | ||
{{Chihuahuaman|time=22:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Oh, sorry. It is probably a mod only thing. My bad.}} | {{Chihuahuaman|time=22:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Oh, sorry. It is probably a mod only thing. My bad.}} | ||
Line 78: | Line 72: | ||
{{Spoilerend}} | {{Spoilerend}} | ||
If it's worlds not pertaining to BBS in anyway, I'm up for anything. The Inexistent proposed | If it's worlds not pertaining to BBS in anyway, I'm up for anything. The Inexistent proposed [[The Land of Dragons]] previously..}} | ||
{{BebopKate|time=18:17, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=I think the Land of Dragons is the most complete of those suggested at this point. | {{BebopKate|time=18:17, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=I think the Land of Dragons is the most complete of those suggested at this point. | ||
Part of the problem with using the BBS worlds is that they're technically not finished until we get the release here, since I'm sure bits will change, and, as Xion mentioned, the spoiler issues. Besides, Land of Dragons is a nice example of an article for a world that has so far appeared in a single game.}} | Part of the problem with using the BBS worlds is that they're technically not finished until we get the release here, since I'm sure bits will change, and, as Xion mentioned, the spoiler issues. Besides, Land of Dragons is a nice example of an article for a world that has so far appeared in a single game.}} | ||
{{DTN|time=03:47, August 30, 2010 (UTC)|text=Hola, señors y señoritas. I have a bit of news for us that might change our plans. Even though we all know that Room Core should have been the | {{DTN|time=03:47, August 30, 2010 (UTC)|text=Hola, señors y señoritas. I have a bit of news for us that might change our plans. Even though we all know that Room Core should have been the featured media for September, it looks like we are going to be putting up some art of the Land of Departure. I'm still hoping that everyone spontaneously changes their vote to the much superior Room Core, but in the event that doesn't happen, we may want to reconsider putting Land of Departure up as the Featured Article. Personally, I'm not sure how good or non-rigged it would look to have our featured media and Featured Article correspond with each other. At the same time, it might be nice, since ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'' is just around the corner. Hooray! | ||
Anyway, I did a long, drastic cleanup of [[100 Acre Wood]] yesterday that should make it a model article. Plus, it's whimsical. If we find that we need to change our decision for Featured Article, I think this would be the way to go. | Anyway, I did a long, drastic cleanup of [[100 Acre Wood]] yesterday that should make it a model article. Plus, it's whimsical. If we find that we need to change our decision for Featured Article, I think this would be the way to go. | ||
Line 99: | Line 93: | ||
Now 100 Acre Wood...good grief, DTN. That's a thing of beauty. That's how a good world article should look. Granted, it's got multiple games to support it, but it's also well-organized, nicely annotated, and bursting with info. I'm all about the Pooh.}} | Now 100 Acre Wood...good grief, DTN. That's a thing of beauty. That's how a good world article should look. Granted, it's got multiple games to support it, but it's also well-organized, nicely annotated, and bursting with info. I'm all about the Pooh.}} | ||
{{Maggosh|nathan=Sorry, Kate, you seem to have misunderstood me. I said, '''along with''' the Land of Departure in | {{Maggosh|nathan=Sorry, Kate, you seem to have misunderstood me. I said, '''along with''' the Land of Departure in featured media; I was agreeing with ENX on Birth by Sleep's article.}} | ||
{{BebopKate|time=23:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=Ah yes, so you did. Sorry, it's been a long day at work. | {{BebopKate|time=23:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)|text=Ah yes, so you did. Sorry, it's been a long day at work. | ||
Line 105: | Line 99: | ||
==Sub-Discussion: Back to General Voting?== | ==Sub-Discussion: Back to General Voting?== | ||
{{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote. The [[ | {{BebopKate|time=18:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, we, as a wiki, like to vote. The [[KHWiki:Mirage Arena|Mirage Arena]] is a great example of that, and I have to say [[KHWiki:Votes for featured media|featured media]] has exceeded everyone's expectations, methinks. | ||
We've improved in quality overall since we stopped | We've improved in quality overall since we stopped featured articles, and even more so since we've re-added them as staff only. I think we have a lot more wiki members who know what quality means and are willing to help and polish something so it's at its best. | ||
Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return | Therefore, I would like to propose, in December, (for the January article, natch), we return featured articles to the hands of all the editors. I do think we should use the same system as featured media (restrained categories), as that has worked very well in producing a wide range of winners, and perhaps borrow and modify a couple of guidelines from FF Wiki's procedures, such as so many nominees before voting starts. If need be, we can re-tool things as we go along to make it work more smoothly, but I think this is a step we should take. | ||
What say you, fellow staffers? ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}} | What say you, fellow staffers? ''Viva la editors''! (Don't hit me, TroisNyx. ^_^)}} |
Latest revision as of 17:57, 30 July 2021
Archives: | ||
---|---|---|
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 |
This page serves as an archive for past votes for featured articles discussions.
December 2010[edit]
|
- Well then, allow [another] staff member to appear. Terribly sorry for the late response, guys. Yes, this is only a staff thing (unless there's been a change made during my inactivity)...anywho, if you guys notice that the staff hasn't voted/selected a featured article for the next month, tell them! Kryten, Neumannz, Maggosh, ENX, and now, TNE are on numerous times of the week be it on here or on the IRC. Inactive staff such as myself, Kate, and the others do occasionally check in here once in a while. Regardless of when we appear or not, you guys can always ping us on our talkpage or on the IRC (heck, even the Facebook/Twitter pages would work) about it.
Onto the vote! I second Maggosh's nomination for Removed content in the Kingdom Hearts series.--Xion4ever 20:34, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
November 2010[edit]
|
|
I second (Er, third.) that vote.--My Keyblade + Your face = pwnage 20:16, November 3, 2010 (UTC)Chihuahuaman
|
I'm sorry, nobody told me that. Thanks for telling me before i got a warning.--My Keyblade + Your face = pwnage 00:13, November 5, 2010 (UTC)Chihuahuaman
October 2010[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September '10 Nominees[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Discussion: Back to General Voting?[edit]
|
|
|
|