Talk:Superboss: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==Absolutely Not== {{neumannz|time=~~~~~|text=This is NOT a good article to keep. "Superboss" is a completely arbitrary classification, and is totally unnecessary. All that's her...") |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Absolutely Not== | ==Absolutely Not== | ||
{{neumannz|time=19:55, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=This is NOT a good article to keep. "Superboss" is a completely arbitrary classification, and is totally unnecessary. All that's here is a list of optional bosses, and why do we need a separate article for that?}} | {{neumannz|time=19:55, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=This is NOT a good article to keep. "Superboss" is a completely arbitrary classification, and is totally unnecessary. All that's here is a list of optional bosses, and why do we need a separate article for that?}} | ||
{{LapisScarab|time=20:33, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=Agreed. I could have sworn we deleted this (or something like it) a while ago.}} | |||
{{AlVan|time20:49, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=I think it's just a good idea to have a page for something that is in every installment in the series. If this would have to go, I still think having something such as "List of Superbosses" or a category page should still be around so we can enphasize how unique these Bosses are. And Neumanz, not every optional one is a ''super'' one. Would anyone else lIke to back me up?}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=20:52, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text="Superboss" is a fan term. I think it sounds really un-professional, personally. We already have the various bosses in the series organized very well in the infoboxes at the bottoms of the pages. [[Kurt Zisa]], for example. The infoboxes are there so that we don't need pages like this that are just lists.}} | |||
{{AlVan|time21:02, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=Okay, I won't make a big deal out of this, but I have to ask a favor. Please keep this here until late tomorrow afternoon so as many people who care can voice their opinion. If it ends up being deleted, I'll try it at the other wiki (that starting to be a tradition for stuff that gets turned down).}} | |||
{{Soxra|roxas=Why not just call it "List of Optional Bosses"? That's what they are.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=1:00am, June 30, 2011 (UTC)}}}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=21:12, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=That doesn't chage much; it's still a list of bosses that's redundant to the infoboxes, regardless of what the name is.}} | |||
{{UnknownChaser|time=Time is base on the reality of our fantasy.|Noctis=Beside, aren't all the "superbosses" already listed in the [[List of Bosses|boss battle page]], thats just creating redundant information, that already there.}} | |||
{{Soxra|roxas=Except they aren't distinguished as such, and as well, the infoboxes can't be browsed at use so you can say "What optional bosses have I missed in ''KH''?" At the very least, there should be a category or list of some kind for them.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=1:44am, June 30, 2011 (UTC)}}}} | |||
{{ST|text=I personally see no reason to keep it}} | |||
{{ErryTalk|time=22:07, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|edea=Useless, only the wiki at Wikia would find it useful as it is now fan-oriented.}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=22:27, 29 June 2011 (EDT)|text=@UnknownChaser: Yes (now that I think about it, I don't know why we need ''that'' page either...). | |||
@Soxra: They aren't distunguished as "superbosses", if that's what you mean, because that isn't an official term. They don't need to be distinguished as "superbosses". The infoboxes can be browsed for that, by a simple thing called reading. Just look at the section of the Optional Bosses infobox, look at the "Kingdom Hearts" section, and go to whatever bosses you don't remember fighting. Lastly, there ''is'' a category list for them. All the enemies are categorized. [http://www.khwiki.net/Category:Optional_bosses For example, Optional Bosses].}} | |||
{{Soxra|roxas=No, I didn't mean superbosses. But I didn't realize there was already an Optional Bosses category. Thus my argument is no longer required. :P|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=7:26pm, June 30, 2011 (UTC)}}}} | |||
{{AlVan|time15:36, 30 June 2011 (EDT)|text=Would it make you guys feel better if we changed the to ''Optional Bosses'' and made it open to all bosses that are not required to win the game?}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=15:57, 30 June 2011 (EDT)|text=The primary issue is nt with the name. It's that there are several things, including the navigation boxes and categories, that make this page redundant and unnecessary. We essentially already have this page, just in a different way.}} | |||
==Re:Coded== | |||
{{AlVan|time10:32, 30 June 2011 (EDT)|text=Is there a Superboss for Re:Coded, I only played the main story once. I did nothing else in that game, I tried but was bored.}} | |||
Yes, Bugged Data Roxas. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 11:11, 30 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
:And Bugged Data-Riku.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 04:18, 2 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
== Page Future == | |||
I may be really late here, as I didn't look at the dates in the talk bubbles, by why not make the "Optional Bosses" page a disimbig? {{The Inexistentsig}} 17:56, 11 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
:Disambigs are used to help direct traffic from pages that would be used as search terms. They are not meant for general lists. The navbox suffices for that purpose, without stretching the bounds of what things are for.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 23:59, 11 July 2011 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 03:59, 12 July 2011
Absolutely Not[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re:Coded[edit]
|
Yes, Bugged Data Roxas. Erry 11:11, 30 June 2011 (EDT)
- And Bugged Data-Riku."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 04:18, 2 July 2011 (EDT)
Page Future[edit]
I may be really late here, as I didn't look at the dates in the talk bubbles, by why not make the "Optional Bosses" page a disimbig? KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON. 17:56, 11 July 2011 (EDT)
- Disambigs are used to help direct traffic from pages that would be used as search terms. They are not meant for general lists. The navbox suffices for that purpose, without stretching the bounds of what things are for."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 23:59, 11 July 2011 (EDT)