Forum:Where will we go?: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "[[w:c:" to "[[wikia:") |
|||
(113 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[File: | |[[File:Ring KHD.png]] [[Forum:Where will we go?/Archive|First Archive]][[File:Ring KHD.png]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
==Initial vote== | ==Initial vote== | ||
'''THE INITIAL VOTING IS NOW CLOSED - Oct 29''' | '''THE INITIAL VOTING IS NOW CLOSED - Oct 29''' | ||
{|class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" | {|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | ||
! | ! | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 71: | Line 70: | ||
==REVOTE== | ==REVOTE== | ||
''If you agree to a revote based on the new circumstances, please replace your name here with your signature. All previous voters must agree to revote for it to proceed.'' | '''''If you agree to a revote based on the new circumstances, please replace your name here with your signature. All previous voters must agree to revote for it to proceed. IF YOU ARE NOT A VOTER AND YOU WANT THE REVOTE TO PROCEED, YOU NEED TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T RE-SIGNED YET.''''' | ||
*{{User:17master/Sign}}02:58, November 13, 2010 (UTC) | *{{User:17master/Sign}}02:58, November 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*BlackSoulBlade | *[[User:BlackSoulBlade|BlackSoulBlade]] 00:15, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Erry | *{{User:Erry/Sig}} 00:22, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*[[User:Falcos|Falcos]] 07:24, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:Falcos|Falcos]] 07:24, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
* | *{{User:JFHavoc/Sig}} 16:08, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 16:18, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 16:18, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{User:Lapidothtill/Sig}} 17:22, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | *{{User:Lapidothtill/Sig}} 17:22, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}20:04, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | *{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}20:04, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*LightoftheDarkness | *[[User:LightoftheDarkness|LightoftheDarkness]] 00:48, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*LightRoxas | *'''Number XIII''' - ''LightRoxas'' - '''The Key of Destiny''' 03:29, November 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*[[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:57, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:57, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*--[[User:Master Vantius|Master Vantius]] 22:12, November 9, 2010 (UTC)Master Vantius | *--[[User:Master Vantius|Master Vantius]] 22:12, November 9, 2010 (UTC)Master Vantius | ||
*[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 16:23, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 16:23, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Randomnessity | *--'''''[[User:Randomnessity|<span style="color:darkgreen;">Random!</span>]][[User talk:Randomnessity|<span style="color:darkblue;">to a point!</span>]]''''' 00:20, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Riku's Love | *--[[User:Riku's Love|Riku's Love is bored :/]] 03:04, November 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*[[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:01, November 13, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:01, November 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*[[User:Sephiroth0812|Sephiroth0812]] 20:03, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:Sephiroth0812|Sephiroth0812]] 20:03, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 16:40, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | *{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 16:40, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*ShardofTruth | *[[User:ShardofTruth|<font face="Segoe UI" color="#033D1B">Shard</font>]][[User:ShardofTruth/Symbols|<font face="Segoe UI" color="#0DE388">of</font>]][[User talk:ShardofTruth|<font face="Segoe UI" color="#033D1B">Truth</font>]] 22:50, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*SilverCrono | *{{SilverCrono/Sig}} | ||
*<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span>]][[User_talk:Soxra|<span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span>]][[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> | *<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span>]][[User_talk:Soxra|<span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span>]][[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> | ||
*The | *{{The Inexistentsig}} | ||
*{{User:CaelumLucisCaliga/Sig}} | *{{User:CaelumLucisCaliga/Sig}} | ||
*{{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} | |||
:I decline the revote. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 16:28, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | :I decline the revote. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 16:28, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
:::::::::::I revoke my vote because enough is enough, Wikia isn't complying and the current situation is that this place is becoming a fan-based wiki while the official is going onto the new server/database. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 16:14, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | :::::::::::I revoke my vote because enough is enough, Wikia isn't complying and the current situation is that this place is becoming a fan-based wiki while the official is going onto the new server/database. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 16:14, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::::Well, I suppose I could follow suit with Erry... [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 16:18, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ::::::::::::Well, I suppose I could follow suit with Erry... [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 16:18, November 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::I didn't know the vote was for where to move to, so I'm in. Unless it is to revote for moving or not. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 00:22, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::::Nope, just for where to move to. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[File:Wayward Wind KHBBS.png|20px]] 00:26, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | |||
So, does this mean the re-vote is on? What will we be voting on, exactly? --Never fear ... [[User:Superdog1123| Superdog]] is here! <sup>[[User talk: Superdog1123| Yipee! :D]]</sup> 05:43, November 10, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123 | So, does this mean the re-vote is on? What will we be voting on, exactly? --Never fear ... [[User:Superdog1123| Superdog]] is here! <sup>[[User talk: Superdog1123| Yipee! :D]]</sup> 05:43, November 10, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123 | ||
:It appears so. Hopefully, the vote should be clear, like: | :It appears so. Hopefully, the vote should be clear, like: | ||
Line 127: | Line 129: | ||
::Sorry for the yo-yo, guys. >_> [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:57, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | ::Sorry for the yo-yo, guys. >_> [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:57, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Yo-yo sums it up pretty damn well. Will you make up your mind already? i don't mean to be rude but your constant flip-flopping is starting to make me dizzy--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 23:13, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | :::Yo-yo sums it up pretty damn well. Will you make up your mind already? i don't mean to be rude but your constant flip-flopping is starting to make me dizzy--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 23:13, November 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Okay, BIG problem. Riku's Love said on Nov. 14 that she would be gone for two weeks. {{The Inexistentsig}} | |||
:Oh, damn that is a problem, and of course she's one of the last ones who hasn't signed yet--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 23:08, November 18, 2010 (UTC) | |||
::REVOTAR!(I'm not too late, am I?) [[User:Roxas pwns sora47|Roxas pwns sora47]] 05:34, November 19, 2010 (UTC)Roxas_pwns_sora47 | |||
Riku's Love. Are you all happy now?--[[User:Riku's Love|Riku's Love is bored :/]] 20:44, November 25, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you very much, RL! :D You have to replace your name up top with your sig, too. >> [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 20:55, November 25, 2010 (UTC) | |||
THE MOTION HAS PASSED!!!!!! We must set up the Revote as quickly as possible if it hasn't been already--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 03:16, November 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Has the revote been set up? If so, when and where is it being held? --Never fear ... [[User:Superdog1123| Superdog]] is here! <sup>[[User talk: Superdog1123| Yipee! :D]]</sup> 05:07, December 2, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123 | |||
==Of What Remains== | ==Of What Remains== | ||
Line 138: | Line 152: | ||
{{Bluer|15:10, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|Not sure about the agreed definition, but fan content would mean, to me, anything made by fans that have significant coverage. Something fanmade that was talked about somewhere, that kind of stuff. Prolly you have a better idea of it.}} | {{Bluer|15:10, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|Not sure about the agreed definition, but fan content would mean, to me, anything made by fans that have significant coverage. Something fanmade that was talked about somewhere, that kind of stuff. Prolly you have a better idea of it.}} | ||
{{Lapidoth|text=Oh, that makes sense.}} | {{Lapidoth|text=Oh, that makes sense.}} | ||
{{Maggosh|nathan=So, if I'm understanding you correctly, we take a FFWiki approach and allow articles for things such as [[ | {{Maggosh|nathan=So, if I'm understanding you correctly, we take a FFWiki approach and allow articles for things such as [[wikia:fialfactasy:Dead Fantasy|Dead Fantasy]] and [[finalfantasy:Dion Rogers' Rinoa|Dion Rogers' Rinoa]]?}} | ||
{{Bluer|15:38, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|Wikia wants to be all "fan community", yeah? Let's give 'em that, starting with "fanwankery".}} | {{Bluer|15:38, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|Wikia wants to be all "fan community", yeah? Let's give 'em that, starting with "fanwankery".}} | ||
{{Maggosh|nathan=Wait, you don't mean to go as far as to allow stuff from the Fanon wiki be posted here, do you?}} | {{Maggosh|nathan=Wait, you don't mean to go as far as to allow stuff from the Fanon wiki be posted here, do you?}} | ||
Line 148: | Line 162: | ||
{{Lapidoth|text=If we allowed fanon material to be added here after the move, wouldn't that cripple the already existing KHfanon?}} | {{Lapidoth|text=If we allowed fanon material to be added here after the move, wouldn't that cripple the already existing KHfanon?}} | ||
:Acceptable fan content is up debate. Same as real world. How much substantial info would it add to the fan community of KH? Its up for debate. As for that crippling KHfanon, depends on what KHfanon contains. '''<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="background:#3300CC">[[User:Bluerfn|<span style="color:white"><sup>BLUER</sup></span>]]</span>[[User talk:Bluerfn|<span style="color:#CC0011">一番</span>]]</font>''' 15:57, November 7, 2010 (UTC) | :Acceptable fan content is up debate. Same as real world. How much substantial info would it add to the fan community of KH? Its up for debate. As for that crippling KHfanon, depends on what KHfanon contains. '''<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="background:#3300CC">[[User:Bluerfn|<span style="color:white"><sup>BLUER</sup></span>]]</span>[[User talk:Bluerfn|<span style="color:#CC0011">一番</span>]]</font>''' 15:57, November 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::About adding fanon content, I think the more topnotch material should be allowed - [[ | ::About adding fanon content, I think the more topnotch material should be allowed - [[wikia:kingdomheartsfanon:Avastar: Kingdom Hearts|Avastar: Kingdom Hearts]], for example. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 16:04, November 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{SC|time=16:08, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|talk=So, pretty much just merge the KH and KHFanon wikis? <!-- Is my story topnotch, maggosh? :3 -->}} | {{SC|time=16:08, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|talk=So, pretty much just merge the KH and KHFanon wikis? <!-- Is my story topnotch, maggosh? :3 -->}} | ||
{{Bluer|16:13, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|That could be one way to interpret it. But I'm not sure if KHfanon wanted to follow KHWiki and move or remain with wikia. Either way, I'll have to sleep on it now, since I'm working tomorrow<!-- damn it --> so we'll probably have more proposals to work on.}} | {{Bluer|16:13, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|That could be one way to interpret it. But I'm not sure if KHfanon wanted to follow KHWiki and move or remain with wikia. Either way, I'll have to sleep on it now, since I'm working tomorrow<!-- damn it --> so we'll probably have more proposals to work on.}} | ||
Line 187: | Line 201: | ||
KKD also brings up a good point.}} | KKD also brings up a good point.}} | ||
Okay, I looked at the [[ | Okay, I looked at the [[wikia:Community:Forum:Anti-Wikia Alliance/linkdatabase|Anti-Wikia Alliance database]] and Kingdom Hearts Wiki isn't up there. Don't we need to register to the Anti-Wikia Alliance to move? [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 23:35, November 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Chitalian8|time=23:44, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|text= The AWA isn't something official, we need no one's permission but our own to move.}} | {{Chitalian8|time=23:44, November 7, 2010 (UTC)|text= The AWA isn't something official, we need no one's permission but our own to move.}} | ||
Line 206: | Line 220: | ||
Okay, maybe Monaco is gone for good, but we still have Monobook. And the reason why they switched to Oasis was because some people didn't like Monaco. And they wanted some way to improve the site. They didn't mean to shove a bad skin down our throats. They are improving Oasis for better navigation. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:06, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | Okay, maybe Monaco is gone for good, but we still have Monobook. And the reason why they switched to Oasis was because some people didn't like Monaco. And they wanted some way to improve the site. They didn't mean to shove a bad skin down our throats. They are improving Oasis for better navigation. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:06, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
ARG ARG ARG. For the like 10th time, only the registered users will see Monobook, anons will see Oasis, and they will format their edits accordingly. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[ | ARG ARG ARG. For the like 10th time, only the registered users will see Monobook, anons will see Oasis, and they will format their edits accordingly. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[File:Wayward Wind KHBBS.png|20px]] 02:10, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:That is not the point. Wikia is improving Oasis. They are trying to make Oasis easier for newer Users. They are trying to help improve their site. Oasis just takes getting used to. That's all. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:16, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | :That is not the point. Wikia is improving Oasis. They are trying to make Oasis easier for newer Users. They are trying to help improve their site. Oasis just takes getting used to. That's all. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 02:16, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
The thing is, they're not changing the core issues, like the reduced width, as well as the adjusted galleries. This isn't about getting used to, it's about actually making the wiki look like crap. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[ | The thing is, they're not changing the core issues, like the reduced width, as well as the adjusted galleries. This isn't about getting used to, it's about actually making the wiki look like crap. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[File:Wayward Wind KHBBS.png|20px]] 02:29, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 218: | Line 232: | ||
:Wikia is a horribly company that cares nothing for the fan's that contribute to it's community. For example, [http://www.niwanetwork.org/forums/index.php?topic=143.0 see this]. Wikia buy's wikis with empty promises and lies, and then forces it, along with all wiki's under it, to have it to use wikia own's extensions and customizations. Being on your own would give you more control over the wiki and be run by actual fans, not faceless cooperations. [[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 02:38, November 8, 2010 (UTC). | :Wikia is a horribly company that cares nothing for the fan's that contribute to it's community. For example, [http://www.niwanetwork.org/forums/index.php?topic=143.0 see this]. Wikia buy's wikis with empty promises and lies, and then forces it, along with all wiki's under it, to have it to use wikia own's extensions and customizations. Being on your own would give you more control over the wiki and be run by actual fans, not faceless cooperations. [[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 02:38, November 8, 2010 (UTC). | ||
Calling Wikia "horrible" and "faceless" is a bit of an exagerration. They are honestly trying to give the layout an easier interface. It works on some levels, and I see where they are going. However, the fact that this is such a template-heavy wiki gives us problems, since we have formatted so many of our changes to Monaco/Monobook. But to accuse them of such things as "empty promises and lies" is a huge overstatement. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[ | Calling Wikia "horrible" and "faceless" is a bit of an exagerration. They are honestly trying to give the layout an easier interface. It works on some levels, and I see where they are going. However, the fact that this is such a template-heavy wiki gives us problems, since we have formatted so many of our changes to Monaco/Monobook. But to accuse them of such things as "empty promises and lies" is a huge overstatement. [[File:Way to the Dawn KHII.png|20px]]'''<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User:Chitalian8|<span style="color:#C00000;">Chitalian</span>]][[User talk:Chitalian8|<span style="color:3300FF;">8</span>]]</span>'''[[File:Wayward Wind KHBBS.png|20px]] 02:43, November 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Sean, Oasis was not started because people didn't like Monaco. Wikia has a tendency to update things that need no update... but they went to far this time. {{The Inexistentsig}} | Sean, Oasis was not started because people didn't like Monaco. Wikia has a tendency to update things that need no update... but they went to far this time. {{The Inexistentsig}} | ||
Line 266: | Line 280: | ||
Bloody hell, what does everyone keep saying the word "official"? '''We are not official in any way'''. Seriously guys, if we were the official KHWiki, SE would be hosting us, not Wikia. {{The Inexistentsig}} | Bloody hell, what does everyone keep saying the word "official"? '''We are not official in any way'''. Seriously guys, if we were the official KHWiki, SE would be hosting us, not Wikia. {{The Inexistentsig}} | ||
{{Superdog1123|time=04:03, November 9, 2010 (UTC)| | {{Superdog1123|time=04:03, November 9, 2010 (UTC)|ven=Okay, so, because the re-vote was denied, what's the current status of the move? I see we're still stuck on whether to fanon-ize this site or not. I personally think that's not as important as where we're going and when that's going to happen (obviously the how has been discussed, but if anyone wants to paraphrase that as well, by all means I won't stop you).}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext=Well, let's talk about re-vote. It was shot down because it was too early to open it. | {{LA|Vtext=Well, let's talk about re-vote. It was shot down because it was too early to open it. | ||
Line 375: | Line 389: | ||
{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=02:08, November 16, 2010 (UTC)|ffx=we’re just summing up our choices and making them as clear as possible. Yes there will be a revote on where to go but I don’t know when it will take place.}} | {{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=02:08, November 16, 2010 (UTC)|ffx=we’re just summing up our choices and making them as clear as possible. Yes there will be a revote on where to go but I don’t know when it will take place.}} | ||
{{ST|text=hopefully soon. I have to agree with Zyeriis, it ''does feel lke we're going nowhere with this}} | |||
Part of the reason we're not getting anywhere is because some people have decided to completely ignore the previous comments and explainations [cough] SeanWheeler [cough], and we have to keep explaining the same thing over and over again<!--It's like he's trying to filibuster us-->. Comments like that aren't helping move the discussion along either, Zyeriis. I don't know why people insist on asking if we've decided this yet. When we do it will be made known to the entire wiki, you don't need to keep bogging down the forum by asking the same questions.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}02:26, November 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Well... why don't we make a seperate page for the revote (say, Where will we go?/Revote), so that it remains pure voting, and the <s>useless</s> discussion can stay on this page. <!---Agreed, well put, Lapis.---> {{The Inexistentsig}} | |||
@Lapis: All the more reason, trying to discuss things on this page is pointless. If people aren't reading the page, it's because it's too long. What I fail to comprehend is why there hasn't been a page created for the revote yet, with all of the information clearly listed rather than scattered throughout this and other pages. As for bogging down the forum...I'm not really sure where I've repeatedly asked the same question(s). I may have brought up a similar question or the same question once before but I don't think that counts as bogging anything down. If you weren't refering to me in particular I don't think you should've used the word: "you". Again, I am having a difficult time understanding a discussion that appears to be stuck in a loop when it would be much simpler to create the re-vote page with the aforementioned information, and when someone asks, direct them there, rather than expect them to sift through this entire page. --[[User:Zyeriis|Zyeriis]] 03:14, November 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
I was referring to commentors like you and SeanWheeler who, instead of just reading the forum and seeing that their questions have been asked and answered several times before, ask them again, ''which bogs down the discussion''. And they would know that they were doing this is they ''bothered to read the forum''. We're not typing this for our own amusement. This is an important subject; if you're too lazy to read the bloody thing, you shouldn't be taking part in the discussion. I don't mean to sound hostile, but I'm fed up with this. This discussion ''is'' stuck in a loop, and it is the same type of repetitive questions you are asking thathas caught it in that loop. | |||
Ugh, anyway, that's a good idea, The_Inexistent. Though I'm giving fair warning here; repetitive questions like this added to ''that'' forum will either be moved here or just flat out removed if it happens enough times. We need to get this settled.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}03:29, November 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:SO, since the revote is set to go ahead, and we keep going in circles, and we've gone through our options several times, [[Forum:Where will we go?/Revoting|I went ahead and made the revote page]]. Please don't get angry at me, but where I come from, if someone doesn't do something once they think of it, it doesn't get done at all. NOTICE, though, that I said that the admins control its running, so don't do anything stupid. And, no, Sean, Staying is NOT an option. {{The Inexistentsig}} | |||
==Yes, No, Don't Know?== | ==Yes, No, Don't Know?== | ||
Line 382: | Line 410: | ||
:Thanks, that clears it up. I'll keep an eye out and watch for the revote. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 04:21, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | :Thanks, that clears it up. I'll keep an eye out and watch for the revote. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 04:21, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 04:42, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=You're welcome. And happy to help.}} | {{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 04:42, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=You're welcome. And happy to help.}} | ||
:I have one other question - once the move happens, what happens to the content that's at this address? I mean, obviously, if we're moving, then that would mean something goes from here to somewhere else. So does everything on here just get deleted, at which point the address kingdomhearts.wikia.com becomes an empty shell, ready for someone else to swoop in, should they decide that they want to be the one to host the Wiki for ''[[Kingdom Hearts]]'' on Wikia? [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 11:05, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | :I have one other question - once the move happens, what happens to the content that's at this address? I mean, obviously, if we're moving, then that would mean something goes from here to somewhere else. So does everything on here just get deleted, at which point the address kingdomhearts.wikia.com becomes an empty shell, ready for someone else to swoop in, should they decide that they want to be the one to host the Wiki for ''[[Kingdom Hearts (series)|Kingdom Hearts]]'' on Wikia? [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 11:05, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 17:04, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Unfortunately, the truth of the matter is this wiki will still remain as is - minus a active community to keep it up. One could, in theory delete all the pages in the wiki, but Wikia may catch wind of it and then do what they can to stop it. [http://starfox.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:We're_merging_with_Lylat_Wiki!_All_users_report!#Note_from_Wikia Look here], where Wikia tells another wiki that the Wikia Wiki will "remain open for whoever decides to remain."}} | {{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 17:04, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Unfortunately, the truth of the matter is this wiki will still remain as is - minus a active community to keep it up. One could, in theory delete all the pages in the wiki, but Wikia may catch wind of it and then do what they can to stop it. [http://starfox.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:We're_merging_with_Lylat_Wiki!_All_users_report!#Note_from_Wikia Look here], where Wikia tells another wiki that the Wikia Wiki will "remain open for whoever decides to remain."}} | ||
:I see. Well, in that case, it seems to me that someone who's perfectly fine with the layout as is could easily request adminship from Wikia and maintain a Wiki at this address. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 17:45, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | :I see. Well, in that case, it seems to me that someone who's perfectly fine with the layout as is could easily request adminship from Wikia and maintain a Wiki at this address. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 17:45, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 388: | Line 416: | ||
: :) So, do I, wish them the best of luck. I'd consider it myself if it weren't for the fact that I have almost no edits here, though that's mainly a matter of just choosing to focus on other projects, rather than a lack of knowledge. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 19:47, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | : :) So, do I, wish them the best of luck. I'd consider it myself if it weren't for the fact that I have almost no edits here, though that's mainly a matter of just choosing to focus on other projects, rather than a lack of knowledge. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] 19:47, November 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 20:04, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Yea, i mainly here to show support for the independent option and to help in the formation of the [[Forum:Square Enix Portal|Square Enix Portal]]}}. | {{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 20:04, November 15, 2010 (UTC)|text=Yea, i mainly here to show support for the independent option and to help in the formation of the [[Forum:Square Enix Portal|Square Enix Portal]]}}. | ||
As a matter of fact, one of the major debates right now is what will become of this address. You can read more about that further up this page.--[[Special:Contributions/66.215.20.249|66.215.20.249]] 02:17, November 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
===Why?=== | |||
Im sorry but i do not understand whats going on, this is ridiculous, why do we need to move, what benefit will we gain?, and i dont see any need for Fanon, the wiki's are about information, this is a wiki first [[User:Rhysno1|Rhysno1]] 16:43, November 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{Lapidoth|text=Just read above so we don't have to explain this all '''again'''.}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=What Lapidoth said. Seriously. | |||
Also, i think the idea is that we're trying to make the Kingdom Hearts Wiki-Wiki ''less'' wiki-ish. I think it's a way of spitting in wikia's faces after we move the official stuff. But seriously, Fanon wiki and Kh Wiki '''aren't''' merging. I've cleared it up with the community there.}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=20:55, November 17, 2010 (UTC)|text=It's not to spit in Wikia's faces, it's because Oasis isn't well suited for what we use the "official" Wiki for. It's more facebook/fan oriented.}} | |||
{{ST|text=Please, that's just an excuse and you know it. I know it's not a bad thing to want to keep up a good image and stuff, but let's face it, we're only doing this to get back at Wikia for not listening to us and forcing this gawd-awful skin on us. don't try and dress it up as something it's not. Anyway, i think we should just go back to the "Delete this wiki entirely after we've copied everything" plan since Kryten just proved to Sannse that we have every right to do so}} | |||
{{KrytenKoro|...no. Oasis is facebook-oriented. It is designed to attract those with no more than a passing interest in the material, and those without rigorous standards. Yes, there is vindictive satisfaction to be had in giving wikia exactly what they asked for, whether it's good for them or not, but when I suggested the fan stuff, it was to give a purpose to the people saying "I'll stay behind, but this place will be a graveyard." And what I "proved to Sannse" was that her claims that we could not rewrite the wiki for that focus were not only absurd, but totally contradicted by the ToU. | |||
Also, re:revote - | |||
'''''<big>IF PEOPLE WANT IT TO PROCEED, THEY NEED TO WORK ON TALKING TO THE PREVIOUS VOTERS. UNTIL I GET A SOLID GO-AHEAD, I WON'T START THE REVOTE, AND UNTIL I GET A SOLID DON'T GO AHEAD, I WILL NOT START THE INSTALLATION AT WIKKII. THE CURRENT OUTCOME IS "SIT HERE, DO NOTHING", WHICH NOBODY WANTS.</big>'''''}} | |||
{{ST|text=oh, ok i misread the conversation there.<small> <small>i still think the "vindictive satisfaction" from "spitting in the face of wikia" came first, but that's just me</small></small>}} | |||
Yes. Yes, it is just you. --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 22:49, November 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{LA|Vtext=Yes, thank you Kryten. | |||
ShadowsTwilight: No, let's NOT delete the wikia-KHWiki. If the wikia-khwiki to take up on my idea and add Theory namespace, then I'm totally looking forward staying behind and participating in that. <small>But if we aren't, then screw the place; I'm leaving.<small><small> I can write irritatingly small text too!</small></small></small> | |||
EDIT: I also don't get why these people ''don't'' want to try a SEIWA. To the people who haven't replaced their names, can you please shed some light for me?}} | |||
{{Soxra|text=They haven't replaced their names most likely because they don't know it's up for a revote. Time to post on their talk pages, methinks.|time=01:23, November 18, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{ST|text=Just so I know I've got this right, SEIWA Square Enix's official Kingdom Hearts Wiki, or something along those lines, correct?<small><small><small>EDIT:hooray for irritatingly small text X3</small></small></small>}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 02:53, November 18, 2010 (UTC)|text=SEIWA isn't official Square Enix Anything. It is, or plans to be, a group of Wiki's Focused on Square Enix Wiki's, that help and support each other in terms of Edits, content templates, etc. as well as any wiki that comes looking for help. These wiki's are independent of any Wiki farms, either through donations, beneactors, or ads. See [[Forum:Square_Enix_Portal]] for more details. }} | |||
{{Superdog1123|time=04:03, November 18, 2010 (UTC)|ven=Kryten, who still has not posted that they want a re-vote? Unless I'm mistaken, everyone's put their name down...}} | |||
{{ST|text=Everyone except for JFHavoc, LightRoxas, Riku's Love, ShardofTruth, and SilverCrono}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=04:44, November 18, 2010 (UTC)|text=I messaged all of them earlier today, but not everyone can be online 24/7. Give it a day or two, they should show up.}} | |||
{{JFHavoc|time=16:10, November 18, 2010 (UTC)|text=There we go. If Lapis hadn't messaged me I probably would've forgotten about the whole thing.}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=Okay, I just asked a user on the IRC who is a personal friend of Riku'sLove to ask her about her opinions on the SEIWA. Apparently, RL is grounded for two weeks and cannot get to a computer. We talked about it on the IRC, but I forgot to log the conversation, as I was in a hurry when I was leaving. Anyway, [[User talk:LegoAlchemist#Hello|here]] is the message, with conformation of her consent. Can we consider this official, or should we get it from Riku's mouth directly?}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 05:42, November 19, 2010 (UTC)|text=Hey guys, wanted to inform you, if you didn't already know, to make sure you put up [http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page a notice on your main page] about the wiki moving. Since the sitenotice doesn't appear in the new skin. }} | |||
Aw man, why couldn't they put the site notice on Oasis? The site notice is important. So, would the anons have to go to [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]] to read it? | |||
''''''''''''''<big>I HATE OASIS!!!</big>'''''''''''''' [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 23:45, November 19, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=01:11, November 20, 2010 (UTC)|seasonal=Ok, now that Sean is done with his unnecessary and rather brief rant, I really do think that we should put some sort of notice on the main page. Almost everyone on the wiki’s here, but some newly registered users might not know. I've put some sort of notice on my userpage, but it's barely anything.}} | |||
{{Soxra|text=Do we also know where LightRoxas is...? Riku's Love is away for a week or two, and LightRoxas hasn't had any contributions for almost 6 days. Can't we forgo them for the sake of our sanity with regards to the revote?|time=02:11, November 20, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=RL has already agreed. Are my talk bubbles invisible or something?}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 03:09, November 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Maybe they're collapsible? [hide]}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=(Thatwas a joke)}} | |||
{{LightRoxas|text= Sorry, I had school stuff. I've signed now.}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 03:42, November 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=As was mine.}} | |||
{{Soxra|text=No, Lego, I saw your message. I even talked to RoxasXIIILK... but no consensus has ever been reached. RL is the last vote, and we're all anxious to get this show on the road...|time=04:01, November 20, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Maggosh|nathan=So, you ''didn't'' see his message.}} | |||
{{Soxra|text=Yes, I did. We ''never'' decided whether or not word-of-mouth counted as RL's vote.|time=04:52, November 20, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=Maybe RoxasXIILK can give us some help.}} | |||
{{KrytenKoro|Personally, I think we should wait for RL out of respect, but we should start the new revote forum, with summaries of every option and everything we know. ''However, it should be edit-protected until the vote is opened''. It would be nice if one of the staff could start it tonight, but I'll work on it tomorrow if it's not up yet.}} | |||
{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=17:27, November 20, 2010 (UTC)|skinny=I completely agree. Though I completely trust RoxasXIIILK, I just feel like RL should be here, saying it herself. She’s just too…well you know what I mean. Wasn’t a revote forum [[Forum:Where will we go?/Revote|already made]], but apparently we don’t have clearance for it yet?}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=Well, it seems RL has come back... all we can do is wait for her to come here and leave her opinions.}} | |||
{{Keyblade0|time= 20:52, November 25, 2010|text= Sheeeeee's back! :) Now the revote can proceed! :D}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 21:02, November 25, 2010 (UTC)|text=Excellent! Please, Tell me if there is something i can help with in the revote.}} | |||
{{LA|Vhappy=Excellent, we now have RL's consent. the Revote can commence! | |||
Also, I have a template that could be used for a theory sub-page. [[User:LegoAlchemist/Lab#Theory namespace tables|Here it is]]. What do you guys think?}} | |||
{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=17:13, November 26, 2010 (UTC)|darkcookies=its really good, lego. Ok let’s begin with the revotation! :D}} | |||
== May we commence already? == | |||
{{LA|Vtext=I think the titles says it all. This place has been nearly inactive for about a week - the notion is passed, we can proceed with the revote. | |||
So.... when are we going to do it?}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=01:42, December 3, 2010 (UTC)|text=[[Forum:Revote|The revote forum was created a few weeks ago]], but the revote isn't open yet from what I understand. Seems like they're still compiling the information about all our options.}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time = [[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 03:24, December 3, 2010 (UTC) | text = Last i heard, they wanted to make sure they knew all their options in as much detail as can be used. Although...that was a week or two ago. Maybe the holidays cuught up with them? }} | |||
{{Soxra|ienzo=I suppose something like that could be. We just want to make sure all users are informed about the potential pros and cons of each move. For example, it was just an hour ago that DTN posted about speed issues on ShoutWiki. I think that's a pretty important detail. | |||
I do agree though, I would like to get this show on the road. But we have to have patience. Rome wasn't <s>moved from Wikia</s> built in a day.|time=03:26, December 3, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=03:30, December 3, 2010 (UTC)|text=According to the Wikipedia article on Rome I just edited<!--no, not really-->, it was built in exactly seventeen hours by Santa Claus, Chuck Norris, and Jesus. Arnold Schwarzeneggar was there too, but he was busy getting the coffee.}} | |||
{{Soxra|ienzo=I don't believe you. Jesus would never work with Santa.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 03:34, December 3, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{LA|Vtext=Guys, wake up! Can an admin please acknowledge that we're ready to start the vote already? It's been over a week, we have plenty of info on the possible hosts. Let's get on with it!}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 20:02, December 7, 2010 (UTC)|text=Eh, i still not sure on the accuracy of the information under the options.}} | |||
{{Soxra|xmas=Actually I'm thinking that it's just about ready to vote, in all honesty. Bud, which information are you unsure of?|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 02:51, December 8, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 03:39, December 8, 2010 (UTC)|text=Well, for one thing, it says "Allows the same as SEIWA." under Wikkii. Wikkii is a wiki farm, so it wouldn't "Independent". Unless you go with the advanced hosting. Then i'd be worrying about the fine print. And i would worry about them pulling another wikia. | |||
Also, in the SEIWA / Kingdom Hearts DB option, the owner has a lot to loose if he becomes a despot; a lot more to loose than any wiki-farm that is. So, i am not sure it would be an issue.}} | |||
{{Soxra|ienzo=That's probably true. I'm not sure what exactly that was supposed to mean, unless it is saying that we get the same freedom (in terms of themes, privacy control, data management rights, and so on). | |||
It is doubtful the owner of SEIWA would become a despot, however it's just a possibility we have to keep in mind.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 05:26, December 8, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 06:29, December 8, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sorry, i wasn't clear; I am re-reading it now, and i see where the problem was; Wikkii is a wiki farm. It has a [http://wikkii.com/wiki/Advanced_Hosting advanced hosting option], that if you take, is similar to the guy who owns DB is offering. | |||
However, unlike the DB Guy, Wikkii has a lot less to loss, should they pull a wikia. | |||
Is this better? }} | |||
Another reason to speed up the revote: The new template viewing system that just got rolled out has made it so that talk bubbles pop in and out of view, unless you click a button. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 22:52, December 8, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{Soxra|mad=Wow... yeah. Oasis is hanging Internet Explorer too (I use Chrome mostly, but I use IE for testing the Oasis skin on my profile and such). | |||
It's time to break the mould. Let's revote.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 22:59, December 8, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 06:14, December 9, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sounds good. Out of curiosity, Was my second attempt at an explanation, any good?}} | |||
{{Soxra|text=Yes. That's actually a better way of highlighting the 'government' of one option versus the other.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 17:51, December 9, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Bud0011|time=[[User:Bud0011|Bud0011]] 19:18, December 9, 2010 (UTC)|text=Cool. Now, my next question. What are the minimum requirements of voting?}} | |||
{{Soxra|ienzo=I'll leave Kryten (or another admin) to confirm this, but I believe all will be allowed to vote in the new vote. It shouldn't just be restricted to high edit counts or to people who voted last time; we want as accurate of a cross-section of our community as we can get.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 20:23, December 9, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=00:05, December 11, 2010 (UTC)|basic=come on already! geez i CANNOT wait for this to be ready! sigh. I sure hope we'll get to vote before the new year! :D I'm not sure how much information we need but it alls seems good enough don't ya think?}} | |||
{{Soxra|ienzo=Yup. =\|time={{User:Soxra/Sig}} 19:05, December 11, 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Keyblade0|time=18:31, December 12, 2010 (UTC)|happy=I hope we can start soon. If they wait any longer, we'll have to do the revote next year! Also, shouldn't someone archive most of this page, or start a new forum? This page is getting longer by the day.}} | |||
{{LightRoxas|axel=Ok, seriously, how much longer are we gonna wait?! The last post here was from mid-December, and we haven't heard anything on the move since then, except people saying January is our last month on this wiki. What are we even waiting for?}} |
Latest revision as of 14:38, 3 June 2019
|
Archive Archives | ||
---|---|---|
First Archive |
Initial vote[edit]
THE INITIAL VOTING IS NOW CLOSED - Oct 29
Move or no?[edit]Move[edit]
Don't move[edit]
Where to?[edit]THE VOTING IS NOW CLOSED - Oct 29 ShoutWiki[edit]
Wikkii[edit]
Private hosting[edit]Please provide comments on your proposal
|
REVOTE[edit]
If you agree to a revote based on the new circumstances, please replace your name here with your signature. All previous voters must agree to revote for it to proceed. IF YOU ARE NOT A VOTER AND YOU WANT THE REVOTE TO PROCEED, YOU NEED TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T RE-SIGNED YET.
- The17Master02:58, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
- BlackSoulBlade 00:15, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- When you said you were the fun one on the lane, who was your competition? The mailbox? - Erry 00:22, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Falcos 07:24, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- 16:08, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- (ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 16:18, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Lapidothtill 17:22, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- LapisLazuliScarab20:04, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- LightoftheDarkness 00:48, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Number XIII - LightRoxas - The Key of Destiny 03:29, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- maggosh 21:57, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
- --Master Vantius 22:12, November 9, 2010 (UTC)Master Vantius
- Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 16:23, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- --Random!to a point! 00:20, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- --Riku's Love is bored :/ 03:04, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- SeanWheeler 02:01, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Sephiroth0812 20:03, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- ShadowsTwilight 16:40, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- ShardofTruth 22:50, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono
- [[ Soxra ]]
- KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
- If I found a million dollars, I'd find the person who lost it, and, if he was poor, I'd return it
- Chitalian8
- I decline the revote. maggosh 16:28, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Dammit, Mag! --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 17:03, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- I second Neumannz's outburst. --DTN 00:17, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- And I second DTN's seconding. -- 02:42, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Even though I didn't vote the first time (big mistake), I second Havoc's seconding of DTN's seconding. KKD
- I agree with these guys^--ShadowsTwilight 02:54, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- ^this BlackSoulBlade 03:08, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
What they all said *points up* When you said you were the fun one on the lane, who was your competition? The mailbox? - Erry 03:56, November 10, 2010 (UTC)- I concur with the majority. --"Never fear ... Superdog is here!" Yipee! :D 04:10, November 10, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123
- ^this BlackSoulBlade 03:08, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with these guys^--ShadowsTwilight 02:54, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Even though I didn't vote the first time (big mistake), I second Havoc's seconding of DTN's seconding. KKD
- And I second DTN's seconding. -- 02:42, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I second Neumannz's outburst. --DTN 00:17, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
So basically, Maggosh, you've got yourself a looooooooot of people pissed at you right now--ShadowsTwilight 04:13, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- If my vote counts, then you have it! Bud0011 04:22, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
- Okay, I revoke my declination. Back to the Continuum! *snaps fingers* maggosh 05:39, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I revoke my vote because enough is enough, Wikia isn't complying and the current situation is that this place is becoming a fan-based wiki while the official is going onto the new server/database. When you said you were the fun one on the lane, who was your competition? The mailbox? - Erry 16:14, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I suppose I could follow suit with Erry... maggosh 16:18, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't know the vote was for where to move to, so I'm in. Unless it is to revote for moving or not. When you said you were the fun one on the lane, who was your competition? The mailbox? - Erry 00:22, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I suppose I could follow suit with Erry... maggosh 16:18, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I revoke my vote because enough is enough, Wikia isn't complying and the current situation is that this place is becoming a fan-based wiki while the official is going onto the new server/database. When you said you were the fun one on the lane, who was your competition? The mailbox? - Erry 16:14, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I revoke my declination. Back to the Continuum! *snaps fingers* maggosh 05:39, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- If my vote counts, then you have it! Bud0011 04:22, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
So, does this mean the re-vote is on? What will we be voting on, exactly? --Never fear ... Superdog is here! Yipee! :D 05:43, November 10, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123
- It appears so. Hopefully, the vote should be clear, like:
- Move to independent server
- Move to Wikii
- Stay here
- Bud0011 05:49, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
Aaaaaand we're back where we started--ShadowsTwilight 16:22, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Which is where? Bud0011 16:29, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
- Whatever happened to making a SEIWA? y'know, a Square Enix NIWA? I'D vote for that. --LegoAlchemist 16:50, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- REVOTE! Hangon - All you need is love! ♫ 13:50, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, BIG problem. Riku's Love said on Nov. 14 that she would be gone for two weeks. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
- Oh, damn that is a problem, and of course she's one of the last ones who hasn't signed yet--ShadowsTwilight 23:08, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
- REVOTAR!(I'm not too late, am I?) Roxas pwns sora47 05:34, November 19, 2010 (UTC)Roxas_pwns_sora47
Riku's Love. Are you all happy now?--Riku's Love is bored :/ 20:44, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, RL! :D You have to replace your name up top with your sig, too. >> maggosh 20:55, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
THE MOTION HAS PASSED!!!!!! We must set up the Revote as quickly as possible if it hasn't been already--ShadowsTwilight 03:16, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
Has the revote been set up? If so, when and where is it being held? --Never fear ... Superdog is here! Yipee! :D 05:07, December 2, 2010 (UTC)Superdog1123
Of What Remains[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll have to see. Perhaps we can set a criterion somewhere, or not. That and real-world coverage. BLUER一番 15:43, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
I assume that includes stuff like coverage of interviews and VA and developer profiles and that kind of thing, right? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 15:49, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
- Acceptable fan content is up debate. Same as real world. How much substantial info would it add to the fan community of KH? Its up for debate. As for that crippling KHfanon, depends on what KHfanon contains. BLUER一番 15:57, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- About adding fanon content, I think the more topnotch material should be allowed - Avastar: Kingdom Hearts, for example. maggosh 16:04, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
- Uh uh, no way! We are not having fanon stuff on this wiki. I approve of having articles on voice actors, but fanon will have to stay on the Twilight Town Library. SeanWheeler 17:45, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
That may not be up to me, but I still don't like it. Putting fanon stuff on this wiki will make it as unreliable as Uncyclopedia. If we want to attract fans, we wouldn't be putting up lies and confuse them. SeanWheeler 18:07, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
@SeanWheeler: I think you're being overzealous and confusing the point of the two wikis. The current KH Wiki - the one that is moving - is intended to be purely devoted to official information on the main articles, and unofficial topics are contained on things like the forums. Once the wiki moves, the Wikia-Wiki will change in some way to differentiate the two; having it be a fan-oriented database is, I think, a good idea.LapisLazuliScarab18:21, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I don't really want to move. You know yesterday, I looked at the Oasis skin, and it is starting to look better. Sora's page is still readable, and so is Donald and Goofy's. In fact I looked at the forum, and it looks good. Wikia is improving the skin. Fixing the bugs. And we still have Monobook. SeanWheeler 18:29, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
1) Once again, this isn't just about us not liking the skin (though that is a big part of it). It's about how Wikia is forcing the skin on us, and that readers are still stuck with Oasis. The only thing Oasis has over Monobook (to me) is a better recent changes page, which readers won't see much anyway. 2) If you don't want to move, then don't. No one's making you. I you want to keep voting on TKW, fine, do that, but do it on the oved wiki (or the original one if they continue the contest as well).--LapisScarab 18:36, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
- porplemontage owns this site, in which you can find out other wiki's he helps with. What was the domain you guys agreed to? Bud0011 20:21, November 7, 2010 (UTC).
Too bad that new site doesn't have Monaco! Why couldn't people get Monaco on their new sites if they miss Monaco so much? SeanWheeler 22:33, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
Well, I'm coming in late to this section, but I support this new turn, although the KHWikia wiki would still stay high up on a google listing with all its activity. That could be a problem. Second, who the hell set up the db? Thirdly, this answer is a little late, but to anyone out there who still dislikes the move because it would be "wasting all that hard work we put into it" is wrong. That is crap. To put it in a simple form, pretend that there are two folders on your hardrive, nothing else. One is named kingdomhearts.wikia.com, and the other is named new wiki. Now suppose that the Wikia folder is full of files, documents and images and such, and that the new wiki folder is completely empty. Moving is basically highlighting everything in the wikia folder, copying it, and then pasting it in the new wiki folder. Nothing was lost in this process. Finally, Sean, the new sight can't have Monaco because Monaco is not a public skin. It is owned by Wikia (if this has changed, please inform me). KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
|
Okay, I looked at the Anti-Wikia Alliance database and Kingdom Hearts Wiki isn't up there. Don't we need to register to the Anti-Wikia Alliance to move? SeanWheeler 23:35, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
- Not a requirement, just a really good idea. Bud0011 23:51, November 7, 2010 (UTC).
|
|
|
First of all, TNE actually originally singed us up for the AWA. Second, the AWA is in no way offical. Third, why would we have to register with them to move? Fourth, I like the idea, but don't listen much to me, as I will no longer exist, er... inexistent on kingdomhearts.wikia.com. AND, for all noobs reading this: do not start doing fanon stuff yet. Nothing is hammered out. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
- I also wonder why Wikia would let people put forums like that on community central. In fact, why don't they threaten to block all the patriots? Sannse, a Wikia staff member responded on our forums without threatening us. Remember when we thought we were going to lose Monobook until I discovered the week before the deadline that we are keeping it? Maybe they were planning on losing it, then they decided to keep it when fans complained. And also Oasis' purpose is to improve accessability on Wikia. It has a few bugs but they are improving it. Look, Wikia is more lenient compared to us and the patriots. In fact, they may even give us back Monaco at a later time. SeanWheeler 01:36, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Um, no, they said that Monaco is gone for good. It will never return. And, if you read anything at the top of the AWA page, Wikia knows that it wouldn't do any good to delete the content. It would still exist and would most likely be restored. The patriots aren't banned as it would violate Wikia's banning policy. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
Okay, maybe Monaco is gone for good, but we still have Monobook. And the reason why they switched to Oasis was because some people didn't like Monaco. And they wanted some way to improve the site. They didn't mean to shove a bad skin down our throats. They are improving Oasis for better navigation. SeanWheeler 02:06, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
ARG ARG ARG. For the like 10th time, only the registered users will see Monobook, anons will see Oasis, and they will format their edits accordingly. Chitalian8 02:10, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- That is not the point. Wikia is improving Oasis. They are trying to make Oasis easier for newer Users. They are trying to help improve their site. Oasis just takes getting used to. That's all. SeanWheeler 02:16, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
The thing is, they're not changing the core issues, like the reduced width, as well as the adjusted galleries. This isn't about getting used to, it's about actually making the wiki look like crap. Chitalian8 02:29, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Sean, enough. The move has been decided, there is no changing that. Either give ideas for where we should move, what the original Wikia should become, or stay out of the discussion, you're making us go in circles. And by the way, we know they didn't mean for the skin to suck as gloriously as it does, but they totally meant to force it on us. You can't "accidentally force something on someone.LapisLazuliScarab02:34, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Not to beat a dead horse, but this is my summery on the situation:
- Wikia is a horribly company that cares nothing for the fan's that contribute to it's community. For example, see this. Wikia buy's wikis with empty promises and lies, and then forces it, along with all wiki's under it, to have it to use wikia own's extensions and customizations. Being on your own would give you more control over the wiki and be run by actual fans, not faceless cooperations. Bud0011 02:38, November 8, 2010 (UTC).
Calling Wikia "horrible" and "faceless" is a bit of an exagerration. They are honestly trying to give the layout an easier interface. It works on some levels, and I see where they are going. However, the fact that this is such a template-heavy wiki gives us problems, since we have formatted so many of our changes to Monaco/Monobook. But to accuse them of such things as "empty promises and lies" is a huge overstatement. Chitalian8 02:43, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Sean, Oasis was not started because people didn't like Monaco. Wikia has a tendency to update things that need no update... but they went to far this time. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
Well...I read all the posts in here thus far, and have to agree with the majority who feel the wiki should be moved...I just want to know where...I saw Wikkii got the most votes, so is that where KHWiki is going, or is it going to the site from porplemontage? Eyestothesky 11:58, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
Revoting[edit]
|
- I also wouldn't be opposed to a revote. The Oasis skin is horrible, but I don't like changes such as moving. Also I think merging with the fanon wiki would be a terrible idea. Even if we move, we should protect the wiki from vandals. Having fanon on this wiki would encourage vandals to put fanon stuff on the facts pages such as the Unknown from Birth by Sleep being Ansem the Wise (that happened once). Also I would want the Wikia Wiki to be no different than the new wiki. SeanWheeler 20:34, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
Well, maggosh stopped the fricken' revote, so now that is useless, and, guys: THE WHOLE POINT OF MOVING IS SO THAT THE WIKIA WIKI REMAINS HERE TO BE CHANGED IN A MANNER THAT MAKES IT MORE FAN BASED. HAVE YOU READ ANY OF THE BLOODY PREVIOUS CONVERSATION? KRYTEN IS RIGHT, CAPSLOCK IS FUN. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
|
|
|
|
Bloody hell, what does everyone keep saying the word "official"? We are not official in any way. Seriously guys, if we were the official KHWiki, SE would be hosting us, not Wikia. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popping in here for a second. You aren't having a re-vote because one person who voted originally, doesn't want another vote? I fail to see the logic in how that is fair. One could easily deny the re-vote just because the option they would vote for anyway, was the winner of the previous vote. I do not, personally, know what he voted for but, does that really matter? It is still unfair on the aforementioned basis.--Zyeriis 03:25, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
I know I'm just an anon, and thus my opinion may not be taken very seriously. I've been a visitor and reader (I've even made some edits) of this wiki for some time now. I completely understand and agree with the decision to move. I like the Square-Enix Portal idea the most, as that seems to benefit the most wikis, including yourselves. I also agree with Zyeriis, just because maggosh doesn't want a re-vote, that automatically means the rest of you can't? Shouldn't the majority rule? The majority ruled with the original vote, so why can't the majority rule with the vote on taking a re-vote? Again, I'm just an anon, but I have been reading this thread for while, since about a week before Oasis became the default. 66.215.20.249 03:44, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
So do we have a plan yet, or no?Mar 03:45, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
So yeah...um...Like that anon, I'm not much more than a casual user, and sometime editor (ffwiki, obliviowiki, wowwiki, not here yet), but like many others despise the changes wikia has been making. Personally, I feel moving is probably best for the quality of the wiki. Irregardless, I have to agree with Zyeriis; it's pretty crazy that there isn't going to be a revote because just 1 person doesn't want to...I could understand if half the people didn't...but this is just one person...it's clear that a revote is wanted... Eyestothesky 05:27, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
- Okay, guys, I don't think you understand how the revote decision was working. In real life, if you don't like the results of an election, you can't just say, "Well, the previous vote didn't count", and keep voting until you get what you want. The revote decision wasn't a vote in and of itself, it was a statement that those who voted last time wanted their votes thrown out. That's not a decision that anyone but them can make, and it's not fair to have them be ignored just because you don't agree with their vote.
- But anyway, maggosh has rescinded his declination, so as soon as the other voters agree to the revote, it can proceed. (Arg, right as I had arranged free time to install on wikkii, too.)(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 13:46, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Well that was the point...I don't understand. Your example isn't identical to this situation for starters. Note: I am completely aware that "arguing" further about this, is absolutely pointless but I have some free time while I am relaxing after work. How do I put this...why would someone agree to the re-vote, if what they previously chose, won. The other people who clearly wish to change their vote based on previously unknown options (the options were options prior to the original vote, they were just not on the ballot) would cause this person to make sure that they get their way by simply saying no to the re-vote (You are voting on whether or not to re-vote, which I simply can't seem to understand). How is re-voting, ignoring their votes? Are the banned from re-voting as well? Again, I completely fail to see how "wanting their votes thrown out" is any different than re-voting.--Zyeriis 21:20, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
- Here is what lies in front of you, based on the amount i've learned in the past month:
- Move to an independent server - See this for a list of Pro's and Cons.
- Move to another Wiki farm - have a similar to the one relationship with Wikia, but with better staff. Don't have to pay for their service, as it is ad based. See this for more information
- a) Move to shoutwiki - one of the most popular Wiki farms.
- b) Move to Wikkii - Seems to be a decent Warm.
- Stay here and learn to deal with the skin
- I hope i explained this well. If not, i could try explaining it again. Bud0011 20:37, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
|
- Happy to help. Bud0011 22:10, November 10, 2010 (UTC).
|
- For any one who doesn't know, See here for the SEIWA idea.
- Also, Do you guys plan on making a new thread for revoting? Bud0011 08:27, November 12, 2010 (UTC).
I agree with the revoting. I really hate how Oasis is forcing people to move. I don't want to move because the only wiki sites I go to are NIWA, Wikipedia, and Wikia. I don't want to move to a new wiki site. The anons could create accounts can't they? And also turning this into a fanon wiki would drive away people who want facts and research. Also people could get used to it after a while, although it could take longer it is pretty awful. There are a few people who like it. I am not ready to move. I would revote to stay on wikia. SeanWheeler 01:54, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
Sean... what are you not getting here? We are not moving just because of Oasis. And you mentioned that you mainly visit Wikipedia (not a Wikifarm site), Wikia (obviously), and the NIWA. We want to make our own version of the NIWA with Square Enix wikis. And what is wrong with moving to a new sight? We are not losing any info, or Monaco. The only thing we will lose are our edit counts, but a good editor shouldn't really care about that. And dude, anons can create accounts on every thing that runs MediaWiki. Or do you mean that the anons could edit? Because, if you haven't noticed, they do that here, too. Next, THIS IS NOT GOING TO TURN INTO A FANON WIKI. HAVE YOU READ ANY OF THE ABOVE CONVERSATION? And the other point of that is that people come to the new site for the facts and information. After delibarating for so long now, most people have decided that moving is the better option. Please consider what I have said. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
On an unrelated note, this reminds me of the American Civil War. Everyone thinks it was because of slavery (our Oasis), when it was honestly that and a lot more. Hear that, Sean? --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 02:44, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
Except Inexistent's wrong, this is all about Oasis, that and the fact that Wikia doesn't listen to it's own community. We may try and say it's something more than that, but in truth it really isn't. I mean seriously, do you mean to tell me that if Wikia suddenly opened it's ears and brought Monaco back this second and everything went back to the way it was, you would still be adament about moving?--ShadowsTwilight 02:50, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
Well, like Silva said, this is like the Civil War. Sure, Oasis sparked it, but it lead us to see other things, like our expansion requiring something more, and Wikia's unfair hosting practices. And, through this dividing war, we have seen the fact that we can now be better off another way. So yes, Oasis started this movement, but it isn't the whole problem. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
When you aren't forced to look at it, you don't tend to notice it. If Wikia is jerking us around discreetly from the shadows, the end-users don't notice it. Plop a new skin that ruins everything in front of them, and they'll revolt. That's what's going on here--because people can see the change now, they look at the bigger picture and see just what Wikia's doing. [[ Soxra ]] 04:37, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
- WE WILL NOT LOSE OUR EDIT COUNTS. IT IS COMPLETELY POSSIBLE TO EXPORT EVERYTHING, AND IT HAS BEEN DONE ALREADY.
- OASIS IS THE CULMINATION OF WIKIA'S SLEIGHTS AGAINST CONTENT.
- ARG.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 06:45, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
Arg. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 23:43, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
There's no reason to revote on whether to move, nothing has changed. The revote was because the option of private hosting w/ SEIWA was brought up after the original votes. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 00:48, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
- Okay, maybe it is turning "fan-based" and not "fanon". But haven't you read Bud's three choices? The third one was "to stay here and deal with the skin." Oh and about the last comment, I don't know if we are getting funding or not. A wiki gets funds from those advertisements right? Well I don't trust ads. Let's just get back on topic. Are we revoting or not? SeanWheeler 15:25, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
You forgot no. 3: "Stay here and deal with the skin". SeanWheeler 20:45, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
HAVE YOU PAID ANY DAMN ATTENTION? Sean, please, listen to me this time. Nothing is changing, except the address you type in at the top of the screen. Kryten even said that Wikia will let us use Monaco. Heck, Wikia might even be proud enough to let us port in Oasis for those who really think that it is beneficial. BUT, on top of that, we are moving FOR SURE. The revote is for WHERE TO MOVE. We're moving no mater what, comprende? KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
|
Can someone clarify if you guys are moving? /sarcasm Are you going to re-vote anytime soon, seems like things aren't progressing at all at the moment.--Zyeriis 01:39, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
Part of the reason we're not getting anywhere is because some people have decided to completely ignore the previous comments and explainations [cough] SeanWheeler [cough], and we have to keep explaining the same thing over and over again. Comments like that aren't helping move the discussion along either, Zyeriis. I don't know why people insist on asking if we've decided this yet. When we do it will be made known to the entire wiki, you don't need to keep bogging down the forum by asking the same questions.LapisLazuliScarab02:26, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Well... why don't we make a seperate page for the revote (say, Where will we go?/Revote), so that it remains pure voting, and the useless discussion can stay on this page. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
@Lapis: All the more reason, trying to discuss things on this page is pointless. If people aren't reading the page, it's because it's too long. What I fail to comprehend is why there hasn't been a page created for the revote yet, with all of the information clearly listed rather than scattered throughout this and other pages. As for bogging down the forum...I'm not really sure where I've repeatedly asked the same question(s). I may have brought up a similar question or the same question once before but I don't think that counts as bogging anything down. If you weren't refering to me in particular I don't think you should've used the word: "you". Again, I am having a difficult time understanding a discussion that appears to be stuck in a loop when it would be much simpler to create the re-vote page with the aforementioned information, and when someone asks, direct them there, rather than expect them to sift through this entire page. --Zyeriis 03:14, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
I was referring to commentors like you and SeanWheeler who, instead of just reading the forum and seeing that their questions have been asked and answered several times before, ask them again, which bogs down the discussion. And they would know that they were doing this is they bothered to read the forum. We're not typing this for our own amusement. This is an important subject; if you're too lazy to read the bloody thing, you shouldn't be taking part in the discussion. I don't mean to sound hostile, but I'm fed up with this. This discussion is stuck in a loop, and it is the same type of repetitive questions you are asking thathas caught it in that loop.
Ugh, anyway, that's a good idea, The_Inexistent. Though I'm giving fair warning here; repetitive questions like this added to that forum will either be moved here or just flat out removed if it happens enough times. We need to get this settled.LapisLazuliScarab03:29, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
- SO, since the revote is set to go ahead, and we keep going in circles, and we've gone through our options several times, I went ahead and made the revote page. Please don't get angry at me, but where I come from, if someone doesn't do something once they think of it, it doesn't get done at all. NOTICE, though, that I said that the admins control its running, so don't do anything stupid. And, no, Sean, Staying is NOT an option. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
Yes, No, Don't Know?[edit]
So as a casual visitor to this Wiki, I've been following this discussion with some confusion and don't really have any clear understanding. Is this Wiki actually moving or not? Yes? No? Don't know? As for me, I like most of the changes that have been made to Wikia - I find most of them very helpful and don't really miss what was taken away anymore. Agent0042 16:35, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
- Thanks, that clears it up. I'll keep an eye out and watch for the revote. Agent0042 04:21, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
- I have one other question - once the move happens, what happens to the content that's at this address? I mean, obviously, if we're moving, then that would mean something goes from here to somewhere else. So does everything on here just get deleted, at which point the address kingdomhearts.wikia.com becomes an empty shell, ready for someone else to swoop in, should they decide that they want to be the one to host the Wiki for Kingdom Hearts on Wikia? Agent0042 11:05, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
- I see. Well, in that case, it seems to me that someone who's perfectly fine with the layout as is could easily request adminship from Wikia and maintain a Wiki at this address. Agent0042 17:45, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
.
- :) So, do I, wish them the best of luck. I'd consider it myself if it weren't for the fact that I have almost no edits here, though that's mainly a matter of just choosing to focus on other projects, rather than a lack of knowledge. Agent0042 19:47, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
.
As a matter of fact, one of the major debates right now is what will become of this address. You can read more about that further up this page.--66.215.20.249 02:17, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Why?[edit]
Im sorry but i do not understand whats going on, this is ridiculous, why do we need to move, what benefit will we gain?, and i dont see any need for Fanon, the wiki's are about information, this is a wiki first Rhysno1 16:43, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Yes, it is just you. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:49, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aw man, why couldn't they put the site notice on Oasis? The site notice is important. So, would the anons have to go to MediaWiki:Sitenotice to read it?
'''''''''I HATE OASIS!!!''''''''' SeanWheeler 23:45, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May we commence already?[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another reason to speed up the revote: The new template viewing system that just got rolled out has made it so that talk bubbles pop in and out of view, unless you click a button. Chitalian8 22:52, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|