Forum:Monobook being kept?: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:38, 3 June 2019

Forums: Index > The Realm of Sleep > Monobook being kept?

Okay, I have been reading Sarah's blog and it seems that while Monaco is being deleted, Monobook is being kept as a preference after November 3rd! SeanWheeler 13:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Lovely. So Sannse was just making stuff up when she said they couldn't have two active skins.LapisLazuliScarab21:08, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

If Monobook's being kept, then those whole long forums that we created are pretty much worthless. Chitalian 8

Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. -- 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. Chitalian 8

While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--ShadowsTwilight 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Are you really sure that Monobook is staying?Keyblade0

Wait... where does it say that Monobook's being kept? I'm not seeing that anywhere. And why exactly can they keep Monobook and not Monaco?LapisLazuliScarab21:30, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Go here: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Sarah_Manley/Improving_Accessibility_on_Wikia#comments and scroll down, she says it there. Chitalian 8

Whoa, thats what I said, but you interrupted. (edit conflict). Why didn't you sign? Who interrupted me? SeanWheeler 21:42, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Edit conflict! Yeah, I just saw it. And apparently they're tossing Monaco because it is "going out of style". ...Bull. First of all, what's that supposed to mean. Second, who decided that?LapisLazuliScarab21:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

maggosh - I had been told the darkness would devour me, but what terrors could it possibly hold, so long as I found the strength to control it?
TALK - This world is just too small.

It would still be Oasis for users that aren't logged into an account, right? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Right. Plus, monobook is missing a lot of the features that we have relied on, like the table of contents. This is a Pyrrhic victory, if anything.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 22:23, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Sannse - <staff />. "Your friendly neighbourhood staffer"
TALK - 01:04, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Monobook will stay as a personal option. Sorry if I wasn't clear, Monobook is an old skin without the full set of features so we don't need to put the same time and effort in to keeping it that we would with Monaco. It's also needed for the Wikipedia parody wikis like Uncyclopedia. I know that most people are concerned with Monaco, so that's the one I've been talking about in past messages

maggosh ^{...the flint is struck.} — "Maybe I should punish you after all."

_{"Come on! Show a little backbone!"}

You do know some of us want it to stay, right?

Sannse - <staff />. "Your friendly neighbourhood staffer"
TALK - 19:57, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I do... I'm sorry I can't make that happen for you

So why couldn't you give us back Monaco? I want this wiki to stay on Wikia and stop what is left of it from becoming a fanon wiki. Just face it. Oasis was a failure. Monaco was as perfect as it was. SeanWheeler 20:50, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any idea how long i have been trying to tell her just that? ever since this mess started. unfortunately, she and the rest of them are being too stubborn and proud to listen to us. seriously, they're starting to rival me in the "stubborn and proud" division, and ask anyone who's seen me in a debate, that's saying something--ShadowsTwilight

21:02, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

Why is Wikia being so stubborn? (Axel reference): You guys, think you could do whatever you want. And I'm sick of it. Go on, you keep on ignoring. I'LL ALWAYS BE THERE TO BRING MONACO BACK!! (end reference). Seriously, deciding to keep a bad skin that everyone hates and throwing away a good skin that everybody likes is mean and stupid. I also have read a blog that says Oasis helps the blind people. That is BULLSHIT! Blind people are incapable of going on the internet. They can't see a damn thing! If a blind person goes on a computer, he would be lost and confused. (Saix reference): What would you rather suffer the loss of? A bad skin, or your community? (end reference) --SeanWheeler

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}
+{{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}}
 <!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
-Okay, I have been reading [[w:c:Community:User blog:Sarah Manley|Sarah's blog]] and it seems that while Monaco is being deleted, Monobook is being kept as a preference after November 3rd! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 13:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+Okay, I have been reading [[wikia:Community:User blog:Sarah Manley|Sarah's blog]] and it seems that while Monaco is being deleted, Monobook is being kept as a preference after November 3rd! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 13:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 Lovely. So Sannse was just making stuff up when she said they couldn't have two active skins.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}21:08, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. --{{User:JFHavoc/Sig}} 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
-Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long.
+Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}}
+While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--[[User:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#000000">Shadows</span>''']][[User talk:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#505050">Twilight</span>''']][[File:Χ-blade (Incomplete) KHBBS.png|50px]] 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+Are you ''really'' sure that Monobook is staying?{{User:Keyblade0/Sig}}
+Wait... where does it say that Monobook's being kept? I'm not seeing that anywhere. And why exactly can they keep Monobook and not Monaco?{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}21:30, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+Go here: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Sarah_Manley/Improving_Accessibility_on_Wikia#comments and scroll down, she says it there. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}}
+Whoa, thats what I said, but you interrupted. (edit conflict). Why didn't you sign? Who interrupted me? [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 21:42, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+Edit conflict! Yeah, I just saw it. And apparently they're tossing Monaco because it is "going out of style". ...Bull. First of all, what's that supposed to mean. Second, who decided that?<!--Hypothetical questions, unless of course a wiki staff member would like to enlighten me.-->{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}21:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+{{Maggosh|YMX=http://i961.photobucket.com/albums/ae93/maggosh/28hpy1j.jpg}}
+It would still be Oasis for users that aren't logged into an account, right?  --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 22:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+:Right. Plus, monobook is missing a lot of the features that we have relied on, like the table of contents. This is a Pyrrhic victory, if anything.[[User:KrytenKoro|(ಠ_ೃ)]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>Bully!</small>]] 22:23, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
+{{SannseTalk|time=01:04, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Monobook will stay as a personal option.  Sorry if I wasn't clear, Monobook is an old skin without the full set of features so we don't need to put the same time and effort in to keeping it that we would with Monaco.  It's also needed for the Wikipedia parody wikis like Uncyclopedia.  I know that most people are concerned with Monaco, so that's the one I've been talking about in past messages }}
+{{Maggosh|flint=You do know some of us want it to ''stay'', right?}}
+{{SannseTalk|time=19:57, November 2, 2010 (UTC)|text=Yes, I do... I'm sorry I can't make that happen for you }}
+:So why couldn't you give us back Monaco? I want this wiki to stay on Wikia and stop what is left of it from becoming a fanon wiki. Just face it. Oasis was a failure. Monaco was as perfect as it was. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 20:50, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
+::Do you have any idea how long i have been trying to tell her just that? ever since this mess started. unfortunately, she and the rest of them are being too stubborn and proud to listen to us. seriously, they're starting to rival me in the "stubborn and proud" division, and ask anyone who's seen me in a debate, that's saying something--{{User:ShadowsTwilight/Sig}} 21:02, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
+Why is Wikia being so stubborn? (Axel reference): You guys, think you could do whatever you want. And I'm sick of it. Go on, you keep on ignoring. I'LL ALWAYS BE THERE TO BRING MONACO BACK!! (end reference). Seriously, deciding to keep a bad skin that everyone hates and throwing away a good skin that everybody likes is mean and stupid. I also have read a blog that says Oasis helps the blind people. That is BULLSHIT! Blind people are incapable of going on the internet. They can't see a damn thing! If a blind person goes on a computer, he would be lost and confused. (Saix reference): What would you rather suffer the loss of? A bad skin, or your community? (end reference) --[[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]]

Forum:Monobook being kept?: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:38, 3 June 2019

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Community

Tools