Talk:Xaldin: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Heh, if you had just called us "edit-warring kids", I'd have let it slide off my back, but saying that we "cram [our] personal theories into the article" shows that you're just making up bullshit to spite us. [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/index.php?title=Marluxia&diff=5007&oldid=4751 How is your glass house, by the way?] On another note, Your confusion about "Ultimania" is hilarious. He's not talking about the website. He talking about the ''[[Wikipedia:Ultimania|Kingdom Hearts II Ultimania]]'', which is an ''official'' guide straight from Square Enix. All information given for the fiction in this book is canon. It's where the assigned <s>elements</s>attributes, Nobodies, and weapon names come from. It contains profiles for the Organization XIII members, which is probably where the "impulsive" part comes from. [[User:129.89.191.231|129.89.191.231]] 22:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | :::Heh, if you had just called us "edit-warring kids", I'd have let it slide off my back, but saying that we "cram [our] personal theories into the article" shows that you're just making up bullshit to spite us. [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/index.php?title=Marluxia&diff=5007&oldid=4751 How is your glass house, by the way?] On another note, Your confusion about "Ultimania" is hilarious. He's not talking about the website. He talking about the ''[[Wikipedia:Ultimania|Kingdom Hearts II Ultimania]]'', which is an ''official'' guide straight from Square Enix. All information given for the fiction in this book is canon. It's where the assigned <s>elements</s>attributes, Nobodies, and weapon names come from. It contains profiles for the Organization XIII members, which is probably where the "impulsive" part comes from. [[User:129.89.191.231|129.89.191.231]] 22:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::That bit in the Marluxia article isn't even my opinion though, it's just a common opinion of others, which is exactly what I wrote. Phrasing it as fact, like the revert warriors at Wikipedia do with their judgments of the Organization members, is a whole different story. '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 22:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | ::::That bit in the Marluxia article isn't even my opinion though, it's just a common opinion of others, which is exactly what I wrote. Phrasing it as fact, like the revert warriors at Wikipedia do with their judgments of the Organization members, is a whole different story. '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 22:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::And those "judgments" are...? We don't even consider "Superior" to be a "title" because there's nothing to back up that assertion, and even make it a point to refer to Larxene's weapons as knives, since that's what the Ultimania refers to them as. Both cases where this site uses personal interpretation on. Furthermore, you're connecting two unrelated things. If there are judgments in the article, that has nothing to do with the massive number of reverts, which are related to poor edits. I dunno about you, but "Demyx is hott" or "Xemnas=Mansex lol" isn't very good for an article. Most of the people who revert such edits, including me, didn't write all of the article, so your assumption that we revert to preserve our "judgments" is very poorly-founded. Please, if you're going to bad-mouth us, at least base it on the actual situation. [[User:129.89.191.231|129.89.191.231]] 01:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | |||