KHWiki talk:Signature policy: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "This should be revised. I don't think that a sig without a name matters as long as it links to the right page. ~~~~") |
m (PorpleBot moved page KHWiki talk:Signature Policy to KHWiki talk:Signature policy: Text replacement - "Signature Policy" to "Signature policy") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This should be revised. I don't think that a sig without a name matters as long as it links to the right page. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 16:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC) | This should be revised. I don't think that a sig without a name matters as long as it links to the right page. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 16:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I think we should keep it. When a sig contains the user's name, it makes it easier to see who said what, especially on mobile devices that don't allow you to see the link by hovering. If we change it, you would have to follow the links every time you want to see who posted a message. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 16:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
::But we're a small community anyway so it's easy to get to know everyone relatively quickly. Even if it's slightly inconvenient, I think it's worth it for people to be able to stylise their sigs how they like. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 17:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::The rule isn't actually that strict. You can even have just your initials or an abbreviation, as long as you have something that identifies who you are. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 17:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::Some people (e.g. LightRoxas) have other names they'd rather go by, which I personally don't mind. As long as it identifies them in some way (and for me, a link to their userpage suffices), I think the signature is okay. However, I do understand if we want to enforce the signature name rule. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 17:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
{{OpenTalk}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 30 July 2021
This should be revised. I don't think that a sig without a name matters as long as it links to the right page. TheFifteenthMember 16:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think we should keep it. When a sig contains the user's name, it makes it easier to see who said what, especially on mobile devices that don't allow you to see the link by hovering. If we change it, you would have to follow the links every time you want to see who posted a message. TheSilentHero 16:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- But we're a small community anyway so it's easy to get to know everyone relatively quickly. Even if it's slightly inconvenient, I think it's worth it for people to be able to stylise their sigs how they like. TheFifteenthMember 17:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- The rule isn't actually that strict. You can even have just your initials or an abbreviation, as long as you have something that identifies who you are. TheSilentHero 17:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Some people (e.g. LightRoxas) have other names they'd rather go by, which I personally don't mind. As long as it identifies them in some way (and for me, a link to their userpage suffices), I think the signature is okay. However, I do understand if we want to enforce the signature name rule. TheFifteenthMember 17:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- The rule isn't actually that strict. You can even have just your initials or an abbreviation, as long as you have something that identifies who you are. TheSilentHero 17:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- But we're a small community anyway so it's easy to get to know everyone relatively quickly. Even if it's slightly inconvenient, I think it's worth it for people to be able to stylise their sigs how they like. TheFifteenthMember 17:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
