Talk:Pet: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Merging?== We could simply remove the story section if it's too much repetition. I don't think there is a reason why the pets of all things wouldn't have their own page sinc...") |
Chainoffire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merging?== | ==Merging?== | ||
We could simply remove the story section if it's too much repetition. I don't think there is a reason why the pets of all things wouldn't have their own page since they are Dream Eaters after all. Maybe if you argue that they are only "costumes" for the real pet but I'm not sure that's supported by the game. Any other opinions? --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 19:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC) | We could simply remove the story section if it's too much repetition. I don't think there is a reason why the pets of all things wouldn't have their own page since they are Dream Eaters after all. Maybe if you argue that they are only "costumes" for the real pet but I'm not sure that's supported by the game. Any other opinions? --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 19:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
I personally don't think there'd be enough content for a page on it's own. Maybe a redirect? {{User:Chainoffire/sig}} 04:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:44, 8 March 2018
Merging?
We could simply remove the story section if it's too much repetition. I don't think there is a reason why the pets of all things wouldn't have their own page since they are Dream Eaters after all. Maybe if you argue that they are only "costumes" for the real pet but I'm not sure that's supported by the game. Any other opinions? --ShardofTruth 19:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I personally don't think there'd be enough content for a page on it's own. Maybe a redirect? 
Chainoffire
04:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
