Talk:Lion Headliner

This is listed as a Pureblood Heartless in the Heartless article."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 06:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I think it's because it's basically a Darkside in a costume (a ridiculous one, at that). If you mean change the way it's listed here, you're right, we probably should. KeybladeSpyMaster 13:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

i perdonally think if it has an emblem, it has an emblem. Otherwise wed put the chocolate statues as emblem for not being darkness.66.87.77.83 15:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Shouldn't this include Darkside (and vice versa) as a variation?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Is it definitely a Darkside in a constume? Because it's got a different head. And maybe different feet. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 23:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

It's maybe slightly different, but it has the same frame -- compare the stance of the two. It's at least as similar as most of the others we've claimed are alternates, like Carb Submarine and Trident Anchor.

Man I really hope these guys show up as optional bosses in a 3D game, the designs are so good. Just one "Kingdom Hearts Coliseum" game with enemies and bosses from all games would make my year."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 23:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

It's a bit complicated with this one. It uses the same attack animation as the Dark Side, can even summon Lion Dancers (which are not Emblem) like a Darkside summons normal Shadows but definitely has a different face and is not a Pureblood itself. ShardofTruth 16:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

It seems similar to the Rapid Thruster/Gummi Thruster situation, where we classify them as different types of heartless but note them as "variations" of each other."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)