Talk:Kingdom Hearts Union χ: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::I agree with Junky. We should keep everything as is. As like she said, this is sort of like a Final Mix. It's specifically being rebranded as a "rejuvenation." While we ALL know it's the same fucking thing - the rebranding is nothing more than yet ANOTHER fucking stalling tactic for KH3 - it'd be confusing otherwise. There's also the fact that every other series or specific game-centric wiki have their own unique pages for differing versions or updates. [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XV_Episode_Duscae Like this one.] [http://finalfantasyxv.gamepedia.com/FFXV_Episode_Gladiolus Or this one.] [http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Blood_and_Wine This one too!] [http://gta.wikia.com/wiki/Downloadable_Content To say nothing of these.] This is very much touted as a major content update - an expansion - so, I think it needs to stay as is. --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 17:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC) | :::I agree with Junky. We should keep everything as is. As like she said, this is sort of like a Final Mix. It's specifically being rebranded as a "rejuvenation." While we ALL know it's the same fucking thing - the rebranding is nothing more than yet ANOTHER fucking stalling tactic for KH3 - it'd be confusing otherwise. There's also the fact that every other series or specific game-centric wiki have their own unique pages for differing versions or updates. [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XV_Episode_Duscae Like this one.] [http://finalfantasyxv.gamepedia.com/FFXV_Episode_Gladiolus Or this one.] [http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Blood_and_Wine This one too!] [http://gta.wikia.com/wiki/Downloadable_Content To say nothing of these.] This is very much touted as a major content update - an expansion - so, I think it needs to stay as is. --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 17:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::But it's not an expansion or DLC, it's a reworked and rebranded version that replaces the base game completely like [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XIV Final Fantasy XIV], the FFWiki uses a [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XIV/Legacy Legacy page] in this case. Maybe that's also something to think about. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC) | ::::But it's not an expansion or DLC, it's a reworked and rebranded version that replaces the base game completely like [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XIV Final Fantasy XIV], the FFWiki uses a [http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XIV/Legacy Legacy page] in this case. Maybe that's also something to think about. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::Lol, I got a message on my client telling me that it's a content update. --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 20:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 11 March 2017
So, about Union X, it seems more like an update and name change to Unchained, so should we merge this with the Unchained page? And for the icons, do we consider it separate games? Should we replace the Unchained icon with the Union icon? TheSilentHero 13:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Personally, I think Union X must be considered as it is a Final Mix version of Unchained X. So, different pages, diffents icons. Lady Junky (talk) 13:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's still strange since these versions aren't separate. I'm really torn here. I think we should keep the original Unchained page, maybe shorten it, but keep the feature list it had back then and link to the new game's version. Everything else (including the icons and templates) should be replaced by the Union version. Even the acronym stayed the same, so it should be easy to do. --ShardofTruth 13:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Junky. We should keep everything as is. As like she said, this is sort of like a Final Mix. It's specifically being rebranded as a "rejuvenation." While we ALL know it's the same fucking thing - the rebranding is nothing more than yet ANOTHER fucking stalling tactic for KH3 - it'd be confusing otherwise. There's also the fact that every other series or specific game-centric wiki have their own unique pages for differing versions or updates. Like this one. Or this one. This one too! To say nothing of these. This is very much touted as a major content update - an expansion - so, I think it needs to stay as is. --Ignis (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- But it's not an expansion or DLC, it's a reworked and rebranded version that replaces the base game completely like Final Fantasy XIV, the FFWiki uses a Legacy page in this case. Maybe that's also something to think about. --ShardofTruth 18:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Junky. We should keep everything as is. As like she said, this is sort of like a Final Mix. It's specifically being rebranded as a "rejuvenation." While we ALL know it's the same fucking thing - the rebranding is nothing more than yet ANOTHER fucking stalling tactic for KH3 - it'd be confusing otherwise. There's also the fact that every other series or specific game-centric wiki have their own unique pages for differing versions or updates. Like this one. Or this one. This one too! To say nothing of these. This is very much touted as a major content update - an expansion - so, I think it needs to stay as is. --Ignis (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's still strange since these versions aren't separate. I'm really torn here. I think we should keep the original Unchained page, maybe shorten it, but keep the feature list it had back then and link to the new game's version. Everything else (including the icons and templates) should be replaced by the Union version. Even the acronym stayed the same, so it should be easy to do. --ShardofTruth 13:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
