Talk:Kingdom Hearts 0.2 Birth by Sleep -A fragmentary passage-

Title

Square Enix NA doesn't spell it out on their website, so there are the versions from the Japanese press material Kingdom Hearts 0.2 Birth by Sleep -A fragmentary passage-, the one from the NA press site Kingdom Hearts 0.2 Birth by Sleep – A Fragmentary Passage – and the spelling wikipedia uses Kingdom Hearts 0.2: Birth by Sleep–A Fragmentary Passage. So which one is correct? I'd go with the Japanese version. Same goes for Back Cover where sometimes the NA materials contains a "[chi] " which is never the case in the Japanese material. --ShardofTruth

there is no release date yet

the release date should be changed to tba. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.212.73.96 (talk • contribs)

We've been told by Square that it will be released in December."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, it's been confirmed that it'll be releasing worldwide. Rex Ronald Rilander (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

As of the most recent demo

Can we please all remember that this big horking page exists, and that there is a fundamental difference between an interview with the author saying "we are putting this in the game" and information gleaned from the screenshot of a demo?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 17:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Game icons

Do we consider mentions of or refuse from a world to justify putting that world icon on a page? Should the BBS princess worlds be backdated to KH1 via scenery in End of the World? Does AFP actually depict or mention them?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 14:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Aqua does use the names Castle of Dreams and Enchanted Dominion, I'm not sure about Dwarf Woodlands, and the reports split the story per original world, so you have "Dark World: Castle of Dreams", "Dark World: Dwarf Woodlands", etc. I guess we could use game icons for that, but not for KH1, since that's just a cameo. TheSilentHero 18:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Patch

http://pastebin.com/ki0xufRG

I think we should have a collapsable patch notes section, myself. Granted I don't see too many changes on the horizon for 0.2, but it just seems like the responsible thing to do. --Ignis (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)