Forum:Disambigs and parsing: Difference between revisions

Forum:Disambigs and parsing (edit)

Revision as of 14:55, 23 April 2016

548 bytes added , 8 years ago

no edit summary

TheSilentHero

Bureaucrats, Administrators

32,743

edits

Revision as of 13:17, 23 April 2016 (edit) TheFifteenthMember (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:55, 23 April 2016 (edit) (undo) TheSilentHero (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:In my opinion, the main title should go to the subject that would be most familiar with readers. Therefore, I would give precedence to techniques over items since I'd imagine more people search for "Vortex" than "Vortex (lance)", although that's debatable. I think that techniques should share pages as much as possible so the three Explosions should be merged. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 13:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)		:In my opinion, the main title should go to the subject that would be most familiar with readers. Therefore, I would give precedence to techniques over items since I'd imagine more people search for "Vortex" than "Vortex (lance)", although that's debatable. I think that techniques should share pages as much as possible so the three Explosions should be merged. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 13:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

			::I think we should make a list of categories, like "ability" and "weapon", and order it by priority. So, every time we get a name with multiple uses, we can look at the list and use the name without parser for the thing that is higher on the list, and use parsers for all other things. I think we should also have more consistency in capitalization of parsers. For example, we capitalize "Command" and "Lance", but not "ability" or "shield". I think we should capitalize all parsers or none. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 14:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)