53,710
edits
Talk:Code Break: Difference between revisions
→Images
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (→Images) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::And Auto Destruct, Prize Shot, and Unlock. The point of having images is to demonstrate the ''technique''. The code can be written as code, unless we're actually showing a gif of it being activated. These images don't make sense.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | ::::And Auto Destruct, Prize Shot, and Unlock. The point of having images is to demonstrate the ''technique''. The code can be written as code, unless we're actually showing a gif of it being activated. These images don't make sense.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::I'm really not seeing a problem with those three. Could you perhaps elaborate on what the problem is with them? [[User:Rex Ronald Rilander|Rex Ronald Rilander]] ([[User talk:Rex Ronald Rilander|talk]]) 18:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | :::::I'm really not seeing a problem with those three. Could you perhaps elaborate on what the problem is with them? [[User:Rex Ronald Rilander|Rex Ronald Rilander]] ([[User talk:Rex Ronald Rilander|talk]]) 18:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::Big ol' bright lines going straight through the text. Regardless, the point of technique images is to show the process, not a detail. We can cover the code itself the way we originally did, as wikicode.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Oh yeah, I guess that would be a problem for most people. <small><small>Not for me though.</small></small> [[User:Rex Ronald Rilander|Rex Ronald Rilander]] ([[User talk:Rex Ronald Rilander|talk]]) 20:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
{{OpenTalk}} | |||