Talk:Diamond Dust (Command): Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Well, it ''is'' the name of the Finish command... (I'm not saying that's reason enough not to move, I'm just saying.) --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 19:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | :Well, it ''is'' the name of the Finish command... (I'm not saying that's reason enough not to move, I'm just saying.) --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 19:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
::True, but the Finish command isn't really the main part of the technique. I'm sure viewers will recognise a "(Style)" tag much more than if they saw "(Command)" (which usually prompts thoughts of Deck Commands etc.) {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | ::True, but the Finish command isn't really the main part of the technique. I'm sure viewers will recognise a "(Style)" tag much more than if they saw "(Command)" (which usually prompts thoughts of Deck Commands etc.) {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Command Styles consist of three things: a visual modification with no practical game effect, a Surge or Storm base command, and a finish command. The Finish command is what's listed in the Report, and I think it's pretty straightforward that it would be confusing to merge all the Surge and Storm commands together. It's a special type of command, certainly, and for stuff like this I prefer we use existing parsers instead of creating new ones.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:14, 3 April 2015
Shouldn't this be Diamond Dust (Style)? It's most definitely not a command. TheFifteenthMember 19:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, it is the name of the Finish command... (I'm not saying that's reason enough not to move, I'm just saying.) --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 19:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- True, but the Finish command isn't really the main part of the technique. I'm sure viewers will recognise a "(Style)" tag much more than if they saw "(Command)" (which usually prompts thoughts of Deck Commands etc.) TheFifteenthMember 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Command Styles consist of three things: a visual modification with no practical game effect, a Surge or Storm base command, and a finish command. The Finish command is what's listed in the Report, and I think it's pretty straightforward that it would be confusing to merge all the Surge and Storm commands together. It's a special type of command, certainly, and for stuff like this I prefer we use existing parsers instead of creating new ones."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 20:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- True, but the Finish command isn't really the main part of the technique. I'm sure viewers will recognise a "(Style)" tag much more than if they saw "(Command)" (which usually prompts thoughts of Deck Commands etc.) TheFifteenthMember 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
