Forum:Discussing the policy.: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(#Badopening)
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
{{RikutheBloody|time={{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 19:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)|angry=Okay, I'm creating it, the place where we discuss the new Policy.}}
{{RikutheBloody|time={{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 19:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)|angry=Okay, I'm creating it, the place where we discuss the new Policy.}}
{{TheFifteenthMember|time={{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)|default=Essentially, we are looking at this point of the staff policy:
The staff member's rights are removed after six months of inactivity, but only after they are warned about the situation. '''If they return and want their rights back, they must undergo a two month probation period, where the user must show that they are active enough to hold their powers again.'''
I suggest it be reworded to say "where the user must show that they are worthy of holding their powers again", which should solve most ambiguity. Thoughts?}}

Revision as of 19:40, 11 February 2015

KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Discussing the policy.


VanitasCGITalk.png
Okay, I'm creating it, the place where we discuss the new Policy. — RikutheBloody 19:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
RikutheBloody
ngM1OTj.png
TheFifteenthMember Yes. You're creepy. I can't say we'll miss you while you're gone, so it'd be best if you did go. We all win that way. TheFifteenthMember 19:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Essentially, we are looking at this point of the staff policy:
The staff member's rights are removed after six months of inactivity, but only after they are warned about the situation. If they return and want their rights back, they must undergo a two month probation period, where the user must show that they are active enough to hold their powers again.

I suggest it be reworded to say "where the user must show that they are worthy of holding their powers again", which should solve most ambiguity. Thoughts?