Forum:Redirected abilities: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
:But I think they shouldn't be split. Like for "Strike Raid", we didn't split "Raid" and "Judgment". We didn't split Command Styles from their finishers as well. | :But I think they shouldn't be split. Like for "Strike Raid", we didn't split "Raid" and "Judgment". We didn't split Command Styles from their finishers as well. | ||
EDIT: Also, splitting will make the GIFs harder to capture since they only last a few seconds. {{User:Pea14733/Sig}} 17:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC) | EDIT: Also, splitting will make the GIFs harder to capture since they only last a few seconds. {{User:Pea14733/Sig}} 17:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
We could use the Youmay template. {{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 17:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 1 October 2014
|
|
They should all be on the main Abilities pages, but if we're missing any you can try to look them us elsewhere. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 01:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. I was checking on the ability sections on the character articles before. TheFifteenthMember 23:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
What's the format for limits? As I understand it, each limit has an ability that enables it and several sequenced commands during activation. For example, the Dance Call limit is enabled through the Applause, Applause ability and the limit starts with the "Dancebeat" command and then continues into the "Finale" command. Should the ability and the limit (and its various commands) be covered on the same page or on separate pages? TheFifteenthMember 14:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think the ability should have a page separate from the actual limit and its various attacks. Thoughts? TheFifteenthMember 10:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't that make the pages really short? RikutheBloody 10:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I would put the ability and limit on the same page, as they are part of the same attack. TheSilentHero 11:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Length isn't an issue; our ability abilities are proof that a page doesn't need to be long to be effective. Technically, the ability isn't part of the attack. The ability simply enables the attack to be triggered. Hence, I consider them to be separate enough to deserve the own pages. Besides, if they were joined, would the article name be the ability or the attack? TheFifteenthMember 12:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's tough, because the ability and the limit are inexorably linked. Do we have a similar situation where we combined as one or split into two? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 17:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I'd think those definitely need to be split. Those articles are outdated so they haven't caught up to the "every ability gets its own page" rule. That's necessary for cases like Donald and Goofy, where their finish commands appear in other games too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFifteenthMember (talk • contribs)
- But I think they shouldn't be split. Like for "Strike Raid", we didn't split "Raid" and "Judgment". We didn't split Command Styles from their finishers as well.
EDIT: Also, splitting will make the GIFs harder to capture since they only last a few seconds. Pea14733 ---- [光] 17:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
We could use the Youmay template. RikutheBloody 17:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)