Forum:Staff Policy: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: Mobile edit
Line 63: Line 63:


{{TheFifteenthMember|time={{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 16:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)|dango=Agreed with everything to this point. We just need the opinions of some staffers before we implement the changes.}}
{{TheFifteenthMember|time={{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 16:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)|dango=Agreed with everything to this point. We just need the opinions of some staffers before we implement the changes.}}
<small>Currently posting this during a break during band camp...from my phone. </small> I cannot give a full response as both a user and staff member. However, I'm going to throw this out there...I've said it before and I'm saying it again now. At least to me, being a staff member means other things than just editing. We come "to power" by nominations from the community. Those users selected are then discussed among the staff and finally chosen. As I've always seen it, we (staff) are mainly at the mercy/judgment of the community...In a way servants-we are servants of the Wiki. Our main priority is editing, yes, but we also must remember our role in the community.
I just now thought back to when I wasn't a staff member. If the staff had full power to decide what determined them inactive and such, man...We have a good staff here, at least I think so- stepping outside the staff/editor position. Regardless, that is not right. We, staff, should have some say, but the community should be the main voice...Assuming it is reasonable, that is.
So, that's all I'm gonna say. You guys decide. As for what to do to me, you could toss me into the Realm of Darkness for a while. Ha ha. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 19:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)