Forum:IRC Channel Operator Discussion: Difference between revisions

Closed/old -> sleep
No edit summary
(Closed/old -> sleep)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}
{{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}}


<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
Line 104: Line 104:
Given that we already have a fair number of operators (even pre-forum), do you really think this is necessary? I personally think that users who are not active enough on this Wiki to be present in its discussions, events, or even contributions shouldn't be granted this type of access.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=}} 18:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)}}
Given that we already have a fair number of operators (even pre-forum), do you really think this is necessary? I personally think that users who are not active enough on this Wiki to be present in its discussions, events, or even contributions shouldn't be granted this type of access.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=}} 18:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)}}
{{Chitalian8|time=19:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|neku= There's nothing wrong with the auto-voicing, you all can go ahead and do that. However, we currently have 10 Ops. I agree with Sox, we really don't need all that many more.}}
{{Chitalian8|time=19:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|neku= There's nothing wrong with the auto-voicing, you all can go ahead and do that. However, we currently have 10 Ops. I agree with Sox, we really don't need all that many more.}}
{{Ark|time=20:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|XJR-9=I agree that our channels are quiet enough that they do not need many operators - I would say that three active OPs would be quite enough. However, that would be three active and <i>knowledgeable</i> operators. I remain unconvinced that we currently have three operators who are actually knowledgeable enough to the meet the level described in my initial post outlining what makes for a good channel operator.<br>
Of course, please feel free to prove me wrong.<br>
<br>
I will also remind you that I did not state that I <b>would</b> promote Sove and Sora1995, just that I would personally favour their candidacy. With your views taken into account, it would seem that the consensus is in favour of Auto-Voice in #KHWiki-noticeboard and demotion to Voice level of inactive users, with no current consensus on new OPs; please correct me if I am wrong on the last point.}}
{{Ark|time=03:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)|XJR-9=In accordance with this Forum, inactive staff members now have Voice rights only (although they may still change the topic through ChanServ) and Auto-Voice is now set for all Wiki Staff in #KHWiki-noticeboard. Be aware that, for reasons of security and convenience, Auto-Voice is linked to NickServ accounts. As such, staff members without NickServ accounts (or those who do not identify to their accounts) will not receive Auto-Voice or Voice rights.<br>
There are no new channel operators, although Dark-EnigmaXIII, Soxra and Chitalian now have Voice rights in both channels.}}