Forum:IRC Channel Operator Discussion: Difference between revisions
m (+) |
(Closed/old -> sleep) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Thank you for taking the time to read this post. I will try to answer any questions that you may have below.<br>}} | Thank you for taking the time to read this post. I will try to answer any questions that you may have below.<br>}} | ||
{{Sove|time=15:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)|roxastalk=I think the inactives should have the operator rights removed and let them have +v instead. Active ones can keep their rights, but if for any reason they are removed, they need to be re-elected the same way we should have any new OPs from now on. How we should het new OPs from now on, that's up for debate. | |||
Also: "I will act upon the aforementioned rights changes in accordance with consensus after this forum has been open for discussion for one week." If you ignore this forum, he will do nothing, there won't be new OPs at all due to lack of consensus.}} | |||
{{SilverCrono|time=23:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)|talk=What if a user is inactive on the wiki, but active on the IRC? Or vice versa? What if they become an inactive staff, but still frequent the IRC? | |||
Also, another question. I admit I'm a serious offender here, but what if a user and another user are joking around or playing a game? Say one of the users is an OP, and kicks the other user. Would this count as an "abuse of power", even though the two users were playing around and both knew they weren't being punished in any serious way? | |||
Again with the questions, sorry. But I notice I don't fit many of those qualities you listed as a good OP status. Not really a question as much as an observation. Does this mean I get demoted? <small>Okay, that was a question.</small> | |||
Now I'm commenting. I like the idea of auto-Voicing. It lets you know who is an op, without them being op'd. Will this get implemented into the social channel, also? | |||
I also notice you said that wiki rights =/= op rights, <s>Arkeh</s> XJR. What does this mean, exactly? Will any forthcoming staff not be awarded OPs until the need is exercised? Will OP rights be taken away from some people who don't even visit the channel(s)? | |||
Also new OPs. I think that the major staff that are moving due to the merge should be OP'd ''immediately''. This doesn't mean Keyhole staff = OP rights; I mean users who show that they frequently visit the KHWiki channels. This would mean I am candidating for Chitalian, Dark-Enigma, Soxra, Chaser, etc, etc. At this moment, I don't know how I feel about people getting demoted or dropped to just Voice. I'll ponder it. | |||
Not relating to the forum, but yeah guys, comment on here. And that's my <s>$0.02</s> $20. <small><small><small><small>Using lots of money...like a <font color="red">boss</font>.</small></small></small></small>}} | |||
{{Sove|time=01:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)|roxastalk= | |||
Q: "What if a user is inactive on the wiki, but active on the IRC? Or vice versa? What if they become an inactive staff, but still frequent the IRC?" | |||
A: Our idea is to completely separate OP rights from wiki rights. Meaning that OP rights are not automatically given to staff members, but they are given to active IRC users per community decision. Being staff isn't a requirement. | |||
Q: "Also, another question. I admit I'm a serious offender here, but what if a user and another user are joking around or playing a game? Say one of the users is an OP, and kicks the other user. Would this count as an "abuse of power", even though the two users were playing around and both knew they weren't being punished in any serious way?" | |||
A: #KHWiki-OPs Also, any good OP will ignore requests to be kicked etc. | |||
Q: "Again with the questions, sorry. But I notice I don't fit many of those qualities you listed as a good OP status. Not really a question as much as an observation. Does this mean I get demoted? <small>Okay, that was a question.</small>" | |||
A: I'm for inactives for now. | |||
Q: "Now I'm commenting. I like the idea of auto-Voicing. It lets you know who is an op, without them being op'd. Will this get implemented into the social channel, also?" | |||
A: If the community wants so. | |||
Q: "I also notice you said that wiki rights =/= op rights, <s>Arkeh</s> XJR. What does this mean, exactly? Will any forthcoming staff not be awarded OPs until the need is exercised? Will OP rights be taken away from some people who don't even visit the channel(s)?" | |||
A: See my first answer. Why would we keep OPs who don't visit the channels, btw? | |||
Argument: "Also new OPs. I think that the major staff that are moving due to the merge should be OP'd ''immediately''. This doesn't mean Keyhole staff = OP rights; I mean users who show that they frequently visit the KHWiki channels. This would mean I am candidating for Chitalian, Dark-Enigma, Soxra, Chaser, etc, etc. At this moment, I don't know how I feel about people getting demoted or dropped to just Voice. I'll ponder it." | |||
Reply: You missed the experience part? From those, DE and Sox are the only ones who I could consider. | |||
[05:17] * Chitalian (~chatzilla@cpe-24-90-28-165.nyc.res.rr.com) has joined #khwiki-ops<br> | |||
[05:17] * ChanServ sets mode: +o Chitalian<br> | |||
[05:17] * Chitalian sets mode: -o Chitalian<br> | |||
[05:17] <Chitalian> /msg chanserv op #wikimedia | |||
I won't even bother to explain how much of a fail that is.}} | |||
{{Ark|time=14:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|XJR-9=As of now, this forum has twelve hours left to run.<br> | |||
The consensus presented to me so far would indicate support for Auto-Voicing of Staff in #KHWiki-noticeboard, the demotion of inactive channel operators from Operator rights to Voice and the possible promotion to channel operator of Dark-EnigmaXIII and Soxra from the Wiki's Staff. I am also in favour of promoting Sove and Sora1995, as they are both sufficiently active and knowledgeable to meet the requirements for channel operator outlined in my first post.<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<b>If you wish to add your opinion, please do so within the next twelve hours.</b><br> | |||
After this time, I will act in accordance with the views presented above.}} | |||
{{Soxra|admin="''I am also in favour of promoting Sove and Sora1995, as they are both sufficiently active and knowledgeable to meet the requirements for channel operator outlined in my first post.''" | |||
Given that we already have a fair number of operators (even pre-forum), do you really think this is necessary? I personally think that users who are not active enough on this Wiki to be present in its discussions, events, or even contributions shouldn't be granted this type of access.|time={{User:Soxra/Sig|t=}} 18:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Chitalian8|time=19:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|neku= There's nothing wrong with the auto-voicing, you all can go ahead and do that. However, we currently have 10 Ops. I agree with Sox, we really don't need all that many more.}} | |||
{{Ark|time=20:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)|XJR-9=I agree that our channels are quiet enough that they do not need many operators - I would say that three active OPs would be quite enough. However, that would be three active and <i>knowledgeable</i> operators. I remain unconvinced that we currently have three operators who are actually knowledgeable enough to the meet the level described in my initial post outlining what makes for a good channel operator.<br> | |||
Of course, please feel free to prove me wrong.<br> | |||
<br> | |||
I will also remind you that I did not state that I <b>would</b> promote Sove and Sora1995, just that I would personally favour their candidacy. With your views taken into account, it would seem that the consensus is in favour of Auto-Voice in #KHWiki-noticeboard and demotion to Voice level of inactive users, with no current consensus on new OPs; please correct me if I am wrong on the last point.}} | |||
{{Ark|time=03:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)|XJR-9=In accordance with this Forum, inactive staff members now have Voice rights only (although they may still change the topic through ChanServ) and Auto-Voice is now set for all Wiki Staff in #KHWiki-noticeboard. Be aware that, for reasons of security and convenience, Auto-Voice is linked to NickServ accounts. As such, staff members without NickServ accounts (or those who do not identify to their accounts) will not receive Auto-Voice or Voice rights.<br> | |||
There are no new channel operators, although Dark-EnigmaXIII, Soxra and Chitalian now have Voice rights in both channels.}} |
Latest revision as of 01:55, 1 July 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|