Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 2.5 ReMIX

Cute Little Icon

Here's that cute little top page icon you guys love so much:

II.5 ReMIX

Well, with this new logo, we can clearly see that it's the numeral II, not the number 2, which means HD 1.5 ReMIX is also I.5 ReMIX. Shouldn't they be moved to those names? (Kingdom Hearts I.5/ II.5 HD ReMIX) - MateusinhoEX

MEX, ...simply look at the bottom of the Japanese logo, do you see II.5 or 2.5? Same goes to 1.5Pea14733 ---- [火] 13:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I think we should at least write "stylized Kingdom Hearts HD II.5 ReMIX". TheFifteenthMember 15:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

That I would agree with. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 15:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

that's not the right reason exactly. it's important to note that katakana aids often use arabic numerals when the display title calls for a roman numeral... final fantasy is one of the biggest exceptions. here, square enix explicitly prints "2.5" just about everywhere besides the logo, in every language, regardless of whatever else. that is why "II.5" is a stylization. it's silly--that's inconsistent branding for multiple reasons--but it's what they did, so... 75.177.119.25 21:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Changes

TobiasHawk - "Link START!" TALK - "Life is like drawing a line, it's never perfect." -- 18:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC) -- My YouTube Should we put down the obvious changes to the games, such as KHIIFM and BBSFM remastered in HD, Playstation 3 Trophy Support, etc... like in the 1.5 page, or wait until they are officially detailed?

Wait until it's officially supported. I believe that's what we did on the 1.5 and 3 articles. ColdAsFire

Iago

Are we sure we want to keep the information about this? While it's most likely to be 2.5, it's possible the "upcoming Kingdom Hearts video game" refers to KH3. The statement is ambiguous and considering the little tidbit of information didn't add anything substantial to the article anyway, I think it's best to have it removed. TheFifteenthMember 22:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I concur. Although entirely reasonable/plausible, I always thought our policy was to never add unless there was clear confirmation/proof. Xion4ever 02:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I'd comment it out. There's a good amount of reason to assume it's HD 2.5 ReMIX, but to avoid any problems, we could just comment it out, and restore it if he really did mean HD 2.5 ReMIX. KeybladeSpyMaster 02:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)