Talk:Skelterwild: Difference between revisions
→Weakness: new section
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I really, really don't want to be the party pooper here, but while the "unintentionally ''hilarious''" addendum is completely true, it's pretty unprofessional, as well as bein...") |
(→Weakness: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I really, really don't want to be the party pooper here, but while the "unintentionally ''hilarious''" addendum is completely true, it's pretty unprofessional, as well as being very subjective. Does this really have a place in the article? {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 22:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | I really, really don't want to be the party pooper here, but while the "unintentionally ''hilarious''" addendum is completely true, it's pretty unprofessional, as well as being very subjective. Does this really have a place in the article? {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 22:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, I think hilarious is a bit too far. Pun, yes. Unintentional innuendo, yes. Drop dead funny beyond belief, no. {{User:LightRoxas/Sig}} 01:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Fine, but if you guys take away my [[Flood]] bitty, I'll set you on fire and see if I won't.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 05:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Weakness == | |||
So, despite its blizzard attributes, & the description in the journal, its weakness is actually blizzard, & it's strong against fire?[[Special:Contributions/75.195.131.23|75.195.131.23]] 06:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC) | |||