Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Stop changing the freaking logo people =_=: new section) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:3 I have absolutely no idea how to implement these on the pages, but here's a top icon. --[[User:Tektek|Tektek]] ([[User talk:Tektek|talk]]) 04:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | :3 I have absolutely no idea how to implement these on the pages, but here's a top icon. --[[User:Tektek|Tektek]] ([[User talk:Tektek|talk]]) 04:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Stop changing the freaking logo people =_= == | |||
Until an official ''transparent'' logo is out in the wild, stick with the one I uploaded. It's higher resolution than the one from the official website. Not to mention, it has a white background - compared to the site's that has a black. It causes a huge contrast with the ALL THE OTHER PAGES, and just generally looks like crap. Don't be difficult and senselessly stubborn. Just because it's from the official website doesn't make it the go-to-image, especially when there's a considerably better alternative. --[[User:Tektek|Tektek]] ([[User talk:Tektek|talk]]) 05:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:06, 20 September 2012
NAME CONFUSION
|
- It's 1.5. The 1 just looks like an "I" to emphasize that it's an HD remake of the first Kingdom Hearts. Official website information, and press information all refer to it as "1.5", not "I.5". --Tektek (talk) 04:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Name Change
Just gotta say this, but the article's title is wrong. It should be the way it's written (and pronounced!): "Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX". --68.230.252.5 03:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Do this thing."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 04:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
One last little thing
- 3 I have absolutely no idea how to implement these on the pages, but here's a top icon. --Tektek (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Stop changing the freaking logo people =_=
Until an official transparent logo is out in the wild, stick with the one I uploaded. It's higher resolution than the one from the official website. Not to mention, it has a white background - compared to the site's that has a black. It causes a huge contrast with the ALL THE OTHER PAGES, and just generally looks like crap. Don't be difficult and senselessly stubborn. Just because it's from the official website doesn't make it the go-to-image, especially when there's a considerably better alternative. --Tektek (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)