21,449
edits
Category talk:Entelechy: Difference between revisions
→Well...
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 303: | Line 303: | ||
::I'm against it as well. "Other" and "Somebody", while not truly official terms, ''were'' used in-game. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ::I'm against it as well. "Other" and "Somebody", while not truly official terms, ''were'' used in-game. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 21:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Quick clarification: "[[wiktionary:entelechy|entelechy]]" is an actual word that means "the complete form of something, or a complex thing made from many simple parts", so Asif is basically suggesting an actual word, rather than a "Term". However, do you guys want to use "Other", then?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | :::Quick clarification: "[[wiktionary:entelechy|entelechy]]" is an actual word that means "the complete form of something, or a complex thing made from many simple parts", so Asif is basically suggesting an actual word, rather than a "Term". However, do you guys want to use "Other", then?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:My position is still to have multiple categories under the "other" symbol, such as humans, beasts, constructs (magical or mechanical), etc. Trying to pick an overarching category causes issues, in my opinion. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 00:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | |||