22
edits
Forum:Judgment Day of Channel Operator Erry: Difference between revisions
Forum:Judgment Day of Channel Operator Erry (edit)
Revision as of 05:40, 22 November 2011
, 13 years ago+
No edit summary |
(+) |
||
| Line 531: | Line 531: | ||
So anyway.... | So anyway.... | ||
Everyone deserves a second chance. I'm sure EK will be better-behaved this time around. {{Keyblade0Sig}} | Everyone deserves a second chance. I'm sure EK will be better-behaved this time around. {{Keyblade0Sig}} | ||
{{Ark|time=05:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)|text=I shall present my view as an 'outsider' to this wiki. | |||
To a casual user this situation looks unprofessional. Having a volatile and unpredictable user in a position of power is off-putting. It is amateurish to have a user unsuitable for a position of power installed in that position of power; it is what one might expect from a small forum with a few dozen users, not from a wiki as well established and authoritative as this. | |||
The logs presented above show a user who regularly behaves in a puerile and jejune manner and is unrepentant about this behaviour. Is this really the type of user who should be in a position of prominence? | |||
ErryK may be a useful ''user'', but he is quite simply unsuitable for the position of ''operator'' and really should not have gained the position in the first place. [http://freenode.net/catalysts.shtml freenode provide a guide on what makes a good 'catalyst'] - a desirable series of traits in any user but vital in an operator. ErryK meets pretty much none of these criteria. | |||
The level of professionalism and type of conduct expected from an operator are considerably stricter than those expected from a normal user. An operator is in a position of power and is looked to by many as an ambassador to the wiki. Bluntly, ErryK reflects poorly on the wiki in his current position, and the high levels of professionalism that the wiki prides itself on are compromised as a result. | |||
As such, it is my opinion that, whilst ErryK should never have gained operator status to begin with, this situation should be resolved with the permanent removal of his operator rights. A 'last chance' should not be given again. Doing so would demonstrate a very poor regard for the values that make this wiki the authoritative resource that it currently is. | |||
The position of operator is a badge of honour; a badge that ErryK does ''not'' deserve to wear.}} | |||