Talk:Master's Defender

Peetzaman - Why do you always have to stare at me like I just drowned your goldfish? TALK - As if! Should this article be deleted? It doesn't say anything that the Master Erauqs page doesn't say.

Neumannz — Looks like I'm gonna have to jump...! TALK — I work alone! Except when I work with Xion...which is all the time. — 20:32, November 12, 2009 (UTC)   Not to mention it's exactly the same as Eraqus's Keyblade...

I know there are 2 page one is "Eraqus's Keyblade" and one is "Master Eraqus's Keyblade". I created "Master Eraqus's Keyblade" because his name is called Master Eraqus not just Eraqus. So maybe delete Eraqus's Keyblade and use "Master Eraqus's Keyblade" instead. Cococrash11

Neumannz — Looks like I'm gonna have to jump...! TALK — I work alone! Except when I work with Xion...which is all the time. — 20:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC)   "Master" is a title, really... Anyways, next time you should just move the page instead of making a new one, so that we don't have to delete one of them

maggosh Strike backwards... — "That's a nice expression." You're terrified, aren't you? Um, no. We already have this page. Delete. Delete, I SAY!

What about Master Xehanort? Also how do you move page? Cococrash11

maggosh Strike backwards... — "That's a nice expression." You're terrified, aren't you? Well, we actually need to discern him from Xehanort. There's no other characters named Eraqus so there's no need for adding 'Master'.

Neumannz — Looks like I'm gonna have to jump...! TALK — I work alone! Except when I work with Xion...which is all the time. — 03:18, November 13, 2009 (UTC)   Cococrash: You see the options at the top of the page: "Edit this page; Leave Message; History; Move; Watch" Most of these are on every wiki page. I'm talking about "Move"

Reversions

Why exactly do people keep reverting the edits about the shape of his keyblade? It seems intentional and notable to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Dazuro 01:51, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

That would be because the shape of the keyblade is already explained in the article, no need to add it as trivia. --—YerMom _{is feeling jolly} 02:23, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

But the article doesn't mention the Square-Enix connection. Dazuro 02:33, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

*sigh*... idiot...

Guyviroth - "Falsebound to Existance, and yet I am here, standing before you." TALK - Do you not see that I am just a mere memory? The picture i provided was not fanart... I have no idea how you came to the conclusion, but it is very astounding that you did... But, i will explain why it's not fanart. Take my picture Paste into MS paint. Turn it 180 degrees. Compare it to the picture of Master Eraqus in the last Vjump scan. Oh look... they look extremely similar; a bit too similar to be mere fanart, right?

...except that the hilt has never been shown uncovered, and the keychain is at the wrong angle. (180 degrees would have it pointing up, for starters. Just "touching it up" would count it as fanart - if it's not in an officially released image, it's not official.Glorious CHAOS! 05:04, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Name

ShadowsTwilight - He's leaving you behind, and when you catch up, he'll be a different person TALK - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA although i'm sure someone has probably addressed this somewhere else, now that we know that Aqua is is seen wielding this in a playable episode, think we'll finally get a name for this

LegoAlchemist - They changed "Snipe Magnet" to "Magnet Grab"? Who's translating this game, 4kids? TALK - Friendships are in direct contravention of mercenary conduct as delineated in your contracts, and on a personal note: I am very, very, disappointed with you. Yeee up~

"Master Keeper"

I'll just put this here. maggosh 00:19, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

w00t --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 00:28, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Trivia

I don't know if it's really necessary to ask, but I feel that maybe I should. Does it seem appropriate to list the keyblade's hand-guard's simple square shape and the E-shaped teeth (as well as forming half of a square shape) as a possible (if not likely) shout out to Eraqus' naming scheme? Twilightning 15:06, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

...That's actually an interesting trivia. But it sounds like speculation :/ ^{What mattered most} _{was remembered least} 15:39, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

I only really aim to clarify because No Name boldly (not even as trivia) lists assumed affiliations with Organization XIII, as well as an assumed reasoning behind its, well, name, and I wonder if this possible connection would also qualify. Twilightning 15:45, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

It's our policy to merge trivias to appropriate sections of the article whenever it's possible, so your "trivia" should also be merged in the designs section. ^{What mattered most} _{was remembered least} 15:49, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

So, would this information be permitted? I had changed it before, but it was undone. No problem altogether, though if it doesn't belong, then I'm having trouble understanding why the math included on the No Name page belongs. Twilightning 14:56, January 23, 2011 (UTC)