6,882
edits
Forum:@&%&*@%&$@&*$%: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
LapisScarab (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 298: | Line 298: | ||
I understand that you cannot handel two skins at once, but why put the rotten skin on when everybody hates it? All you just want to do is make eveyone love it. Tough luck; the Spyro Wiki is leaving. Sorry to be so rude, but I am very upset.}} | I understand that you cannot handel two skins at once, but why put the rotten skin on when everybody hates it? All you just want to do is make eveyone love it. Tough luck; the Spyro Wiki is leaving. Sorry to be so rude, but I am very upset.}} | ||
{{LapisScarab|time=16:00, October 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=@Sannse: Really? People have said they ''love'' it? A challenge: prove it. I garuntee that for every user that supposedly loves this skin I can give you at least a dozen users that don't. As far as I'm concerned the "silent majority" (and the majority has been ''far'' from silent) doesn't exist. If there are people who like this skin and can come up with good reasons for why to keep it, it's ''their'' responsibility to speak up. As of now, it just seems like you're trying to make some imaginary support for the skin. | |||
Don't give me this crap about how having two skins is "too complicated". Right now there's ''three'', Monobook, Monaco, and Oasis. I realize that you alone aren't responsible for this, and I know we're kind of beating you up here, but I'm on my last nerve. You aren't listening to us, you're just being patronizing. | |||
And that scrolling glitch is still sort of going on. It only happens once every time I load the page and it may just be that I'm scrolling down too fast too early, but it's yet another problem that didn't exist with Monaco.}} | |||