Talk:Sniperwild: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
LapisScarab (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Sniper Wilds are based on monkeys. Monkeys have fur. Therefore, Sniper Wilds can be very easily assumed to have fur. This is a rather generally made assumption. It is obvious that the Sniper Wild does not have feathers, skin is unlikely, and it can be concluded from its original species that its body is covered in fur, like a monkey. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 22:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | :Sniper Wilds are based on monkeys. Monkeys have fur. Therefore, Sniper Wilds can be very easily assumed to have fur. This is a rather generally made assumption. It is obvious that the Sniper Wild does not have feathers, skin is unlikely, and it can be concluded from its original species that its body is covered in fur, like a monkey. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 22:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:EDIT: Even in the images for the extremely closely related Powerwild and Bouncywild (all of their journal entries state they are derived from monkeys), you can see fur bunching up in places. Skin does not do this, and it is in fact very characteristic of fur. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 22:52, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | :EDIT: Even in the images for the extremely closely related Powerwild and Bouncywild (all of their journal entries state they are derived from monkeys), you can see fur bunching up in places. Skin does not do this, and it is in fact very characteristic of fur. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 22:52, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{LapisScarab|time=22:53, August 14, 2010 (UTC)|text=The Design/Appearance sections have a little more squeeze room when it came to real-world references like that. Calling it fur instead of repeating "body" or "skin" over and over flows better. I get where you're coming from though, that's why I tend to use phrases like "seems to be" when describing something that looks obvious. If we have to change it, how about this?: | |||
'''A Sniper Wild is a feminine, monkey-like Heartless with a predominantly pink body. The pink sections of its body are covered by white stripes, its torso is brown, its hands and feet are black. It wears brown and tan bracelets and armlets, a gold choker, two gold hoop earrings, and a violet bow. Its face is pitch-black and its eyes are glowing yellow. The Sniper Wild carries a small slingshot as a weapon and its Heartless emblem is emblazoned on its chest.''' | |||
}} |
Revision as of 22:53, 14 August 2010
|
- Sniper Wilds are based on monkeys. Monkeys have fur. Therefore, Sniper Wilds can be very easily assumed to have fur. This is a rather generally made assumption. It is obvious that the Sniper Wild does not have feathers, skin is unlikely, and it can be concluded from its original species that its body is covered in fur, like a monkey. --DTN 22:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- EDIT: Even in the images for the extremely closely related Powerwild and Bouncywild (all of their journal entries state they are derived from monkeys), you can see fur bunching up in places. Skin does not do this, and it is in fact very characteristic of fur. --DTN 22:52, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
|