|
|
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| {{KKD|time=03:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|roxas2=Sounds good to me. I'll get right on the pie-baking. What kind would everyone prefer? Apple? Cherry?}} | | {{KKD|time=03:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|roxas2=Sounds good to me. I'll get right on the pie-baking. What kind would everyone prefer? Apple? Cherry?}} |
| {{DTN|time=03:48, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|text=Thank you, LapisScarab, and we are always open to suggestions, ENX. However, we cannot openly or blatantly say on the main channel or on the wiki things like, "Okay, so I want this user for this reason, and definitely not this user for these reasons." It just leads to users getting offended. The decision is made by staffers because that we are using our skills of judgment that come to us with our induction to the ''Kingdom Hearts'' Wiki staff. Unlike on other wikis, being a staffer often times means more than just an extra function or two. My apologies, but I would much prefer it if the staffer meeting could be held in this manner. Users selecting our candidates for our judgment to be passed onto is the easiest way to include the opinions of both the non-staffers and staffers in conjuction without having to have an open discussion.}} | | {{DTN|time=03:48, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|text=Thank you, LapisScarab, and we are always open to suggestions, ENX. However, we cannot openly or blatantly say on the main channel or on the wiki things like, "Okay, so I want this user for this reason, and definitely not this user for these reasons." It just leads to users getting offended. The decision is made by staffers because that we are using our skills of judgment that come to us with our induction to the ''Kingdom Hearts'' Wiki staff. Unlike on other wikis, being a staffer often times means more than just an extra function or two. My apologies, but I would much prefer it if the staffer meeting could be held in this manner. Users selecting our candidates for our judgment to be passed onto is the easiest way to include the opinions of both the non-staffers and staffers in conjuction without having to have an open discussion.}} |
| | |
| | ==Moderator== |
| | {{Bluer|01:21, August 24, 2010 (UTC)| |
| | I would like to announce that as of August 24, users with rollback now have the: |
| | * Ability to rollback to previous edits; already applied. |
| | * Ability to move pages without a rate limit; i.e, move an unlimited amount of pages within any time interval |
| | * Ability to move pages and suppress redirects - move a page without leaving a redirect. |
| | * Ability to move files and suppress redirects - renaming a file without leaving a redirect. |
| | and from now on are users of Moderator rights.}} |