Template talk:InfoForm: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you must ; though I'll see what the rest have to say about it. Personally, I don't know. {{User:Troisnyxetienne/Signature}} 08:56, March 17, 2010 (UTC) | If you must ; though I'll see what the rest have to say about it. Personally, I don't know. {{User:Troisnyxetienne/Signature}} 08:56, March 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
I definately disagree. Though it may not be needed, it really helps make the Form pages stand out, as most of them are, well, boring. This adds a little color to the pages. And forms ''are'' quite a widespread category. There are so many! --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 21:41, March 21, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:41, 21 March 2010
I do not see a large need for this template. The information in the template is very basic, and is usually repeated within the article. Some of the cells' contents don't even make sense; Sora changed into Data Form because of "World's Laws"? I think the form articles would be fine without this infobox, since forms are also not such a widespread category of subjects as enemies, characters, or weapons are. --DTN 
22:53, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
If you must ; though I'll see what the rest have to say about it. Personally, I don't know. TROISNYX 
AMDG 08:56, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
I definately disagree. Though it may not be needed, it really helps make the Form pages stand out, as most of them are, well, boring. This adds a little color to the pages. And forms are quite a widespread category. There are so many! --
LegoAlchemist 21:41, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
