Talk:Armored Knight: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Cyberweasel89|Cyberweasel89]] 09:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Cyberweasel89|Cyberweasel89]] 09:06, November 25, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Although it's considered a fat dagger rather than a sword, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katara_%28sword%29 katars] are the only blades I know of with a handle perpendicular to the blade.—[[User:Urutapu|Urutapu]] 09:32, November 25, 2009 (UTC) | :Although it's considered a fat dagger rather than a sword, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katara_%28sword%29 katars] are the only blades I know of with a handle perpendicular to the blade.—[[User:Urutapu|Urutapu]] 09:32, November 25, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, thank you. The blades look rather smiliar, albeit I'm fairly certain the Armored Knight uses its blade for cutting, as opposed to stabbing like the katar. | |||
::Should we add this to the article? Possibly under a "trivia" section? | |||
::On another note, am I the only one who finds the Armored Knights to be rather weak? When I play, I only require a few good hits to take one down. I assume it is so they are manageable enemies during the Battle of 1000 Heartless, but this makes them quite impractical enemies outside of said event... | |||
::--[[User:Cyberweasel89|Cyberweasel89]] 01:59, November 27, 2009 (UTC) |