Template talk:Form: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{XNX|text=OK...If Anti Form is separated by a space, then why was the Anti Form page allowed to be changed to ''AntiForm''? Every time the phrase "Anti Form" is used, was also changed to ''Antiform'', so it's not as if anyone thought it was wrong.}}
{{XNX|text=OK...If Anti Form is separated by a space, then why was the Anti Form page allowed to be changed to ''AntiForm''? Every time the phrase "Anti Form" is used, was also changed to ''Antiform'', so it's not as if anyone thought it was wrong.}}
{{KrytenKoro|I don't know about other uses, but the guide and all official sources call it "Anti Form", and that's how the other forms are parsed. Anti Form is not AntiSora, so I think someone got the two mixed up.}}
{{KrytenKoro|I don't know about other uses, but the guide and all official sources call it "Anti Form", and that's how the other forms are parsed. Anti Form is not AntiSora, so I think someone got the two mixed up.}}
{{XNX|text=If that's the case, I'll make the appropriate changes to the ''Anti Form'' page. Thank you, KrytenKoro.}}
== Rules of thumb! ==
Something is considered a '''F'''orm if:
#The game specifically calls it a Form.
#The journal specifically calls it a Form.
##It gets a separate, permanent entry in the Journal, like Riku's Halloween Form.
#Nomura explicitly says "this is a form".
OTHERWISE, if a "form" can be covered completely in the parent article, it does not go on this template. It does not get its own page.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 01:37, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry disagreeing with you but the game and the journal don' say anything about the Dark Mode being a form but though  I never saw Nomura calling it a form I'm not sure about it--[[User:Xabryn|Xabryn]] 22:34, May 12, 2010 (UTC)
4,684

edits