Talk:Soothing: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==Cure== The translation is a bit iffy, since I can't seem to find a dictionary entry for it, but "光かがやく" (something like "shining") is replacing "Bright" as the Cure-e...') |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Like Spirit/Gale, the elemental affinity of "MoistBright" has been given to "BrightBright", and like Power/Energy, two differently named materials are pretty much going to have the same english name. However, unlike those two, The "BrightBright" has completely replaced "MoistBright", as MoistBright does not appear at all in Days, and BrightBright does not appear anywhere else. Basically, while we have separate pages for different material types with facets of this problem, the Bright materials have all the facets, seemingly indicating that the ''Japanese'' name has been "corrected". Given these circumstances, do we want the "BrightBright" material info to be merged with the "MoistBright" material info when we can get more info on ''Days''? Even though it's slightly irregular, I would personally say that in this case it would be the most appropriate thing to do.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ::Like Spirit/Gale, the elemental affinity of "MoistBright" has been given to "BrightBright", and like Power/Energy, two differently named materials are pretty much going to have the same english name. However, unlike those two, The "BrightBright" has completely replaced "MoistBright", as MoistBright does not appear at all in Days, and BrightBright does not appear anywhere else. Basically, while we have separate pages for different material types with facets of this problem, the Bright materials have all the facets, seemingly indicating that the ''Japanese'' name has been "corrected". Given these circumstances, do we want the "BrightBright" material info to be merged with the "MoistBright" material info when we can get more info on ''Days''? Even though it's slightly irregular, I would personally say that in this case it would be the most appropriate thing to do.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::RETREAD: Days ended up translating it as "Shining". It has the same elemental affinity and color, but technically has different names. Do we want to split?[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 22:54, May 27, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:54, 27 May 2010
Cure
The translation is a bit iffy, since I can't seem to find a dictionary entry for it, but "光かがやく" (something like "shining") is replacing "Bright" as the Cure-elemental material in 358/2 Days. It may in fact end up being a more literal translation for "Bright", as opposed to the actual name of "Moist".Glorious CHAOS! 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, 光輝く means "light-shining", a close synonym of "bright". Okay, new problem:
- Like Spirit/Gale, the elemental affinity of "MoistBright" has been given to "BrightBright", and like Power/Energy, two differently named materials are pretty much going to have the same english name. However, unlike those two, The "BrightBright" has completely replaced "MoistBright", as MoistBright does not appear at all in Days, and BrightBright does not appear anywhere else. Basically, while we have separate pages for different material types with facets of this problem, the Bright materials have all the facets, seemingly indicating that the Japanese name has been "corrected". Given these circumstances, do we want the "BrightBright" material info to be merged with the "MoistBright" material info when we can get more info on Days? Even though it's slightly irregular, I would personally say that in this case it would be the most appropriate thing to do.Glorious CHAOS! 22:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
