Editing User talk:Soroxas

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 92: Line 92:


Also, the concept art of Hollow Bastion should not count, since it's not originally a direct rip of anything. I simply removed the grey smears on them, making it closer to what the artist intended. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 17:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Also, the concept art of Hollow Bastion should not count, since it's not originally a direct rip of anything. I simply removed the grey smears on them, making it closer to what the artist intended. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 17:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
:There are a lot of old images from the split, but the KHWiki are starting to replace them in HD. Plus, as a large franchise, it is difficult to keep up with the amount of images on this wiki. But you did confess to Kryten that you did alter those images nonetheless, and we need to get images directly from the games so we aren't presenting them in a false light. If anything, I just wanted to alert you that, if you see any images that needs replacement, you can request images to be uploaded and have them brought to attention by posting [[KHWiki:Image requests|here]].--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 18:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
:There are a lot of old images from the split, but the KHWiki are starting to replace them in HD. Plus, as a large franchise, it is difficult to keep up with the amount of images on this wiki. But you did confess to Kryten that you did alter those images nonetheless, and we need to get images directly from the games so we aren't presenting them in a false light. If anything, I just wanted to alert you that, if you see any images that needs replacement, you can request images to be uploaded and have them brought to attention by posting [[KHWiki:Image_Requests|here]].--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 18:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


::I don't see the issue with altering an image to make it look unaltered and how it is actually supposed to look in the first place. I don't view it as "presenting these images in a false light". If anything, the originals, with their incorrect black levels, were already doing that. I'm done altering the brightness levels of images anyway.[[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 18:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
::I don't see the issue with altering an image to make it look unaltered and how it is actually supposed to look in the first place. I don't view it as "presenting these images in a false light". If anything, the originals, with their incorrect black levels, were already doing that. I'm done altering the brightness levels of images anyway.[[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 18:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
:::Because you are taking an image and manually altering it based on an assumption that that is how it is supposed to look, not how it actual look in the game(s). That's why Kryten informed you that we need to get images directly from the games themselves. Please stop sidestepping the issue. Please list the images that you altered. I'll put in a request on the Image Requests to have those replaced. I think that you should talk ShardofTruth about to rip images directly from the games, as Shard is our best image uploader.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 17:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
:::Because you are taking an image and manually altering it based on an assumption that that is how it is supposed to look, not how it actual look in the game(s). That's why Kryten informed you that we need to get images directly from the games themselves. Please stop sidestepping the issue. Please list the images that you altered. I'll put in a request on the Image Requests to have those replaced. I think that you should talk ShardofTruth about to rip images directly from the games, as Shard is our best image uploader.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 17:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


::::If the images were altered before, they should indeed be replaced. However, altering the images to make them look unaltered is not the way to do this. First of all, because it's hard to tell how exactly they were intended to look, and second, because they'll still be altered. The correct way to replace them would be to take screenshots from the games themselves. As NinjaSheik asked, please list the images you altered on the [[KHWiki:Image requests|request page]] so they can be replaced. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 18:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
::::If the images were altered before, they should indeed be replaced. However, altering the images to make them look unaltered is not the way to do this. First of all, because it's hard to tell how exactly they were intended to look, and second, because they'll still be altered. The correct way to replace them would be to take screenshots from the games themselves. As NinjaSheik asked, please list the images you altered on the [[KHWiki:Image_Requests|request page]] so they can be replaced. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 18:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


:::::My edits are closer to look like how the image is supposed to look. It does not take a genius or a perfectionist to know when black levels are incorrect. It's not "hard" to know in these cases such as Vanitas's images. It's not some vague wild assumption, I've played the games and know the brightness of the scenes. And while my alteration (I usually go to Photoshop and just click Auto-Contrast) may not be 100 percent correct to the original, it is close enough to the point it should not be an issue. For example, if an image is the number 100, then the unaltered version is like a 50 while mine is like a 90 or 95. In any case, here's every file I've ever uploaded:
:::::My edits are closer to look like how the image is supposed to look. It does not take a genius or a perfectionist to know when black levels are incorrect. It's not "hard" to know in these cases such as Vanitas's images. It's not some vague wild assumption, I've played the games and know the brightness of the scenes. And while my alteration (I usually go to Photoshop and just click Auto-Contrast) may not be 100 percent correct to the original, it is close enough to the point it should not be an issue. For example, if an image is the number 100, then the unaltered version is like a 50 while mine is like a 90 or 95. In any case, here's every file I've ever uploaded:
Line 203: Line 203:


Please remember that trivia sections are against the rules unless the information absolutely cannot be covered elsewhere in the article, and must be devoid of speculation or non-notable info.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Please remember that trivia sections are against the rules unless the information absolutely cannot be covered elsewhere in the article, and must be devoid of speculation or non-notable info.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
:Please remember this (ex. Skoll). That kind of information can be covered in the Design section, for example.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 16:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


== https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Beast&curid=7501&diff=746029&oldid=743710 ==
== https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Beast&curid=7501&diff=746029&oldid=743710 ==
Line 242: Line 241:
:::The wiki's longstanding consensus policy is that if a note placed within a trivia section ''can'' be covered elsewhere in the article, it ''must'' be. Trivia sections are ''only'' to be used for information that is worth communicating to the reader, but ''absolutely cannot'' be made to fit in any of the existing sections. The wiki has a longstanding directive to reduce or eliminate trivia sections as much as possible. The misspellings can be covered as alternate names in the lead -- ergo, that's where they go. If necessary, they could also go in a design section, or be a ref note in the lead rather than plain text (as I did with Yuffie, as that one was less in-universe), but they have a ''valid'' place to go that's not a trivia section.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
:::The wiki's longstanding consensus policy is that if a note placed within a trivia section ''can'' be covered elsewhere in the article, it ''must'' be. Trivia sections are ''only'' to be used for information that is worth communicating to the reader, but ''absolutely cannot'' be made to fit in any of the existing sections. The wiki has a longstanding directive to reduce or eliminate trivia sections as much as possible. The misspellings can be covered as alternate names in the lead -- ergo, that's where they go. If necessary, they could also go in a design section, or be a ref note in the lead rather than plain text (as I did with Yuffie, as that one was less in-universe), but they have a ''valid'' place to go that's not a trivia section.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
::::Since this is something I had attempted to explain to you [[#Mandy Moore|above]], please let me know if you have any suggestions on how to make that policy clearer, and I will ask the staff to improve the wording of that policy.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
::::Since this is something I had attempted to explain to you [[#Mandy Moore|above]], please let me know if you have any suggestions on how to make that policy clearer, and I will ask the staff to improve the wording of that policy.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::If you think me saying "I don't know why you insist" is me trying to instigate drama, then yikes. It reminds me of the admins and mods on a forum called ResetERA who ban people for literally anything, and try to stretch things that really aren't that inherently offensive as being super offensive, claiming they're trying to do something. Me saying "I don't know why you insist" is literally me saying that I'm confused and not sure why you support doing something. '''That's all there is to it.''' You reverted something I worked on without explaining why. I already knew that simply by asking you why you did it isn't going to make you suddenly turn around and change your opinion, which is why I said "insist". This is why I don't particularly enjoy talking with you because it feels like I'm walking on eggshells. For future sake, you should phrase it like "you seem to want to start drama", not "you want to start drama". By adding "seem", it is far better behavior that comes across as less accusatory and hypocritical yourself. And to support my claim that I'm not looking for drama, I'm ending this aspect of our discussion right here.
:::::It is absolutely possible for someone to misread "North American version as KH2" as including the PS3/PS4 versions. Just because KH2 is in a compilation on PS3/PS4, it doesn't mean it's suddenly not KH2 on PS3/PS4, or doesn't qualify as a North American version of KH2. We should not be vague and unspecific on the wiki. Maybe while ''you'' wouldn't assume the PS3/PS4 versions, it doesn't mean you speak for everyone, especially for our average and common readers. We have to be clear.
:::::I don't feel like you addressed my point about length in Trivia, but whatever. It seems you're already discussing this with KeybladeSpyMaster.
:::::On an unrelated note, I wish you'd start trying to improve the articles yourself instead of adding cleanup templates everywhere. I don't see why you can't "clean up Riku-Ansem's article for conciseness a bit" yourself, or spend 5 minutes improving Sally's story section (as I don't see much else that needs improving and feel we covered everything sufficiently). [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 22:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
::::::"If you think me saying" --  saying "you" indicates you're speaking to a person, and "insist" indicates that you're ascribing intent. My following of policy is neither personal nor intent. I'm not staff so this is not a warning, but dude, you've already had staff talk to you [[#Regarding your edits to the Seifer page|previously]] [[#Warning|about insinuating]] that other editors are taking personal action to spite you, when in reality they are simply following consensus policies that you do not seem to have familiarized yourself with. Speaking from personal experience, it's detrimental to the project to be doing this -- for the record, ''I personally'' have been disciplined in the past for such behavior. It is by no means asking you to "walk on eggshells" to ask you to assume good faith toward other editors.
::::::In addition -- as I have already reminded you, the trivia policy was explicitly explained to you [[#Mandy Moore|above]]. Since you seem to be complaining that the policy wasn't explained to you a second time, for the benefit of the project please let me know how you would word the policy to make it sufficiently clear the first time it's explained to an editor.
::::::"It is absolutely possible" -- but it is [[Kurt Zisa|not]] [[Abilities (KH)|how]] [[Abilities (KHII)|the wiki]] [[Kingdom Hearts II|uses those terms]]. KH2 is not in a compilation on PS3/PS4 -- [[Kingdom Hearts II Final Mix]], a different game, is. This wiki [[Ribbon|consistently]] treats KH2 and KH2FM as separate for all mechanical purposes, as a matter of policy (so, again, if you do find an outlier, ''that page'' is in error).
::::::[https://www.khwiki.com/Special:Editcount/KrytenKoro "I wish you'd start trying to improve the articles yourself"] -- What you're trying to accuse me of here is completely at odds with reality, vastly underestimates the time it takes to write an article correctly, and has nothing to do with the current topic. I'm confused as to why you brought it up here. If you believe I am violating policy, I would recommend you either cite me on the policy in a separate message thread on my talk page, or notify a staff member to correct or discipline me.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
If I feel like people are being unfair or being accusatory to me, then I'll call them out. And I disagree and feel it's reductionist to claim those prior times were just all me "not knowing policies", there was more to it and it was more complicated than that. This time, you accused ME of bad faith (claiming I'm trying to start drama), and even now, it seems like you feel I'm totally in the wrong and should be reprimanded. You even have a warning about accusing other people of bad faith and being hostile to other editors.
No, I'm not complaining about Trivia not being explained to me properly. I'm trying to make a valid point about how by adding a fair amount of length to something in the introduction section, it can make it deserve its own Trivia point, as introduction sections should be brief and focus on the article, not little and more minor things like a one-time incident misspelling in a memo which the vast majority of people probably don't read or won't remember.
There is nothing wrong with the wiki being more specific to avoid confusion for new readers, which is my point about the terminology on the wiki. If a wiki does not try to be considerate of newer readers who are unfamiliar with the policies and terminology of a wiki, then that's a failure in my eyes. I'm not asking the wiki to change its terminology, simply expressing how little things like clarifying potential room for confusion can go a long way.
And finally, as I said before, I think cleanup templates EVERYWHERE on the wiki look awful, and sometimes, they're too vague as to what specifically needs to be improved. For example, what about Sally's story section needs to be improved? Is it because it's missing content? Not enough length? Too much length? Who knows because you don't clarify stuff like that. We aren't mind readers. And yes, me bringing it up is irrelevant, I simply don't want to start another section on it on your talkpage, so might as well bring it up here while I'm talking to you now. Are you breaking policy because you have a tendency to add cleanup templates? No, but it's still not an ideal thing to do if you have the potential to do it yourself, or can clarify better what specifically should be improved. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 17:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
:"This time, you accused ME of bad faith" --- I pointed out that you were accusing me, personally, of "insisting" on following the  rules. You trying to pull some sort of "he who smelt it dealt it" nonsense is just that. Stop trying to DARVO.
:"I'm trying to make a valid point" -- The Trivia policy does not focus on length. It focuses on whether the information can be covered elsewhere. [[Aladdin]] and [[Cloud]] are the models for a character article, specifically the lead section. Adding in an alternate name is not unduly extending that - Dilan's lead, for example, is if anything ''too'' sparse compared to what the MoS recommends. If you don't like the policy, open a forum about it, but don't go to editors who are ''following the policy'' and accuse them of having some sort of agenda.
:"There is nothing wrong with the wiki being more specific" -- there is when it introduces incorrect claims. KH2 and KH2FM are not the same game. It would be appropriate to specify that it was corrected in the FM version, but not "PS3 and PS4". The standard for misspellings across the wiki has been to either put it in the lead, or cover it as a ref note.
:"And yes, me bringing it up is irrelevant," -- yes, it's irrelevant, and to put it bluntly, it's pretty crappy that you're still trying to derail with it.
:"We aren't mind readers." -- That is why the MoS and talk pages exist. If you have the time and resources to address a page marked for cleanup, you have every ability to ask for clarification if you're not sure what needs cleaned up.
:When KSM reverted my edits, I didn't go to him and say "I don't know why you insisted on this, it's so ridiculous!". I asked him "why did you do this" and I cited the specific policies that I felt justified my version of the page. ''That'' is how you're supposed to go about this, not turning everything into some personal drama.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 21:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Okay, cut it out, you two. You're both accusing each other of things and I can only see this ending badly. If either of you have a problem with another user or their edits, you can go to one of the staff members, instead of "fighting it out" personally. As for the initial problem, the misspellings, some of the staff discussed what is the best way of dealing with it, and we've decided to go for references in the lead. That way it won't take up any space in the lead, but it won't break our policy regarding trivia either. You can find an example [[Dr. Jumba|on this page]]. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 21:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
== KH3 images ==
Thank you for getting those cropped.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 16:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
:Sure. Can you delete the jpg versions? [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 16:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
== Riku ==
Wasn't the section you removed covering his original (unseen) discussion with Namine, that set him on a collision course with Roxas and Xion in the first place? Not the one we see in a cutscene, where Namine tells him the problem is getting worse.[[Special:Contributions/71.222.195.240|71.222.195.240]] 00:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
::We need a source that such a conversation even existed. From my understanding, Riku learned about Roxas from DiZ, and he tracked down Xion on a lead that the Organization is lurking around Beast's Castle. I also read somewhere that Riku was originally meant to have his own game after his ending in CoM, but before he faced off against Xion at Beast's Castle, which is why there's like 100 days where he is unseen. I've been using this [https://www.khinsider.com/358-2-days/interviews/kingdom-hearts-358-2-days-ultimania---timeline timeline], and as you can see, there's a mysterious gap between Day 52 on Riku's side and Day 149 on Riku's side. Riku talked to Namine around 255, which we see in a flashback on 276. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 13:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
::I was mistaken, it's not unseen -- Day 276, presented as a flashback:
:"(The silver haired man brushes her hair aside and recalls a conversation  with Naminé. They sit in a White Room, at opposite ends of the table) Naminé: I wasn't sure I'd see you again. Riku: You made me a promise."{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
== Depths of Darkness ==
Depths of Darkness, Castle Town, Forest of Thorns, and the Snow White one are all subworlds of Dark World, and should have articles as we do with Mysterious Tower, the Underworld, and a few other articles. Depths of Darkness is the Destiny Islands portion of Dark World. The Destiny Islands article should link to Depths of Darkness, but it is its own world in the fiction and any reference to the area should be to DoD instead of Destiny Islands itself, which several of our articles are inaccurately doing at the current moment.
Per our scope, anything that is an official term gets an article, even if its small. We merge stuff only when its impossible to focus on one topic at a time -- such as the White Mushroom's Arts items, which can't be covered individually and still be understandable.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
== Gummiphone data ==
Hey, someone's pointed out that the [[Gummiphone]] page you created is partially based on leaks. I just want to remind you that leaks are not allowed on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, so just make sure you don't add any of that again. Thanks for all your hard work over the last couple weeks! {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 23:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
:Sure thing. I'm actually trying to avoid leaks (story-wise), but I can't help myself when it comes to gameplay a bit, or certain things like the intro, what the world map looks like, etc. I figured that the functions of the Gummiphone would be pretty whatever. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 03:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
::Sure, I understand that. Reason for the strictness is that we're actively trying to dispel rumors/claims that we have leaks and therefore people should avoid visiting the wiki. We had a doozy of a time dispeling those claims earlier in December, so we'd like to avoid giving people reason to think they need to avoid us over the leaks. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 05:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
:::FWIW, I'm on the "once we actually have final version of data, is fair game" boat.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
== ''To be written.'' ==
That needs to be <nowiki>{{section-stub}}</nowiki>.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
== Hans ==
[https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Hans&diff=752098&oldid=752076 You did play KH3, right]? None of that was true.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 13:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
:I just beat Corona and haven't gotten to Frozen. My bad then, it seemed like a logical assumption and I didn't realize they changed his personality drastically (or hide parts in KH3 which they explicitly showed in the movie) as the Corona world seemed accurate enough to the movie. If they really don't show those aspects of him in KH3, then I find that really surprising and disappointing, especially if all he does is show up in the end to kill Elsa. Then again, I know Sora arrives when Elsa flees, so they skipped "Love is an Open Door" and probably skipped building up Hans as an antagonist in favor of Larxene. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 16:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
::It's not a very good idea to add information for something you haven't seen yet. Make sure you actually know what happens before writing articles. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 16:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
:::He literally only shows up in the background. The journal entry makes a point of stating that the heroes have no idea what his deal was.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 18:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
== "before you hit undo" ==
That's not how it works, no. If there's a critical error with the edit, it is completely acceptable for the reviewer to simply revert it and go on to reviewing other edits, than to try and parse out the good bits.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
:I never said it's not acceptable, but it's not nice wiki etiquette either, especially if it's easily fixable, which it totally was. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 20:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
::[https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Hector_Barbossa&diff=next&oldid=755914 Seeing as your edit was reverting me already fixing things the first time], no, that's not an example of poor wiki etiquette. I was already having time wasted by having to refix a mess I had already fixed. If you want your corrections to stick, do them separately from stuff that people will need to revert.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 21:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
:::I didn't see your edits and I don't check every single entry in Recent Changes. I don't check an article's history every time I make an edit either. Most people don't. But if you were aware that I was fixing other things than the heading and saw what I did, yet reverted anyway, then it's poor etiquette because it was easily fixable and you could've easily edited around it. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 21:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
::::[https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Hector_Barbossa&diff=next&oldid=755914 "it's poor etiquette because it was easily fixable and you could've easily edited around it."]{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
:::::I already told you. I never hit undo on your edit because I didn't ''see'' it. I literally reached The Carribean world of KH3 last night, so I started editing character articles for the world, noticed the KH3 sections contained information which occurred before Sora's arrival into the world, and edited it as such. It's a coincidence that my edits happened the day after you removed those headings. You may not believe me, but I'm telling you the truth, it's just bad timing. It's why I also recently uploaded the [https://www.khwiki.com/File:The_Caribbean_KHIII.png world map pic]. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 23:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
:::The point is that what you're criticizing of me is something that you were in greater violation of. ''Before'' getting upset and grousing at other editors, check into the article to confirm what's happening. That's why when I see a violation of policy, I track down who first did it instead of yelling at the last one to touch the page.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
::::For the third time, I was understandably nescient and never clicked "undo". My point is you didn't have to revert ''all'' my edits. You were ''aware'' and seemed to do what you did either out of laziness or spite. There's a huge difference in context between my edit and your edit and I think I have the right to "grouse" (no, it's really just mentioning what you did). All I said was "Actually look at my edits before you click undo" on the article. You're the one so bothered by that that you decide to leave me a message and yet you claim I'm the upset one? Sure. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 04:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:::::"I was understandably nescient" -- this is the thing that you need to correct. That is why I made a post informing you of the misstep that you had made, so that you could spend effort trying to correct it. Excuses do not correct the misstep.
:::::"and never clicked "undo"" -- this isn't relevant. You undid an edit that was fixing the article. Whether you actually clicked the "undo" button or not, you made a misstep.
:::::" My point is you didn't have to revert ''all'' my edits." -- as I've tried to explain multiple times -- yes, I did. Reviewers are supposed to be checking all the edits going through to make sure they are good -- taking the time to fix bad edits step by step, instead of just rejecting them, is a bonus, not the expectation. Time is at a premium.
:::::"I think I have the right to "grouse"" -- you don't. This kind of thing is why the "2-years" thing was suggested to begin with. You are ''not'' familiar with the wiki's policies or standards, and when you're informed of them you've habitually lashed out instead of rigorously trying to get up to speed. I and many other editors have been banned in the past for less. Please focus on trying to learn the wiki's standards, as long as you learn them nobody is going to care whether or not your prior missteps were on purpose. All we care about is good content.
:::::"You're the one so bothered by that that you decide to leave me a message" -- I'm correcting you on wiki policy and standards. That doesn't make me upset.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
::::::Me not clicking undo is relevant because it means my original edit was done out of innocence/nescience, not spite. Context is important because it shows us our intentions. Considering that you spend so much time editing this wiki and effort dissecting everything I write on my talk page, I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you, so much so that you couldn't even spare a few seconds to re-do some incorrect links. And if I see something I find to complain about, which you try to undermine as "grousing", I will. Editors have the right to make complaints, and yes, even *gasp* suggestions to policies. If editors weren't allowed to voice complaints about policies or behaviors of other editors (which I see myself doing the latter right now as opposed to the former), then this wiki would be an Orwellian authoritarian dictatorship which ignores basic free speech. When I'm informed of a policy I don't know of and it makes the neurons in my head understand what I need to do, then I follow it, but to say I'm not allowed to even express my thoughts on current policies in a disagreeing manner is ridiculous. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 14:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:"Me not clicking undo is relevant" - I didn't say it was done out of spite. I said it was wrong. (This misunderstanding of yours seems to be at the root of a lot of the issues you're involved in -- people correcting your actions are not necessarily accusing you of malice.)
:"I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you" -- this is also wrong. Getting an editor to understand and follow policy correctly saves much, much more time in the long run, and the only cases where the time is not worth it, is when the editor should just be blocked or banned altogether.
:"I will." -- and in cases like this, your complaint would be inaccurate. I never said you weren't allowed to voice your thoughts. I said you were being ignorant.
:"then this wiki would be an Orwellian authoritarian dictatorship which ignores basic free speech" -- while free speech is certainly helpful to a wiki, it is a mistake to believe that that is the point of the project. The project is building an encyclopedia with comprehensive, accurate information. If free speech were the primary goal, blocks and bans wouldn't exist (and as a multiply-banned editor, I would know).{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
::You heavily implied my edit was out of spite and/or laziness in your third comment in this section. It implied I knew what you did, when I didn't, and seemed to be accusing me of hypocrisy. I'm not annoyed at you because over a policy, I'm annoyed at you for trying to justify easily fixable laziness by using technicalities in policies with "well, the rules say I don't HAVE to do this so I'm technically following the policies so you don't the right to complain at me"-style arguments. You claim I'm ignorant, when to me, it seems like you're ignorant of wiki etiquette. And you don't have to keep mentioning you were banned in the past. If you're trying to sound sympathetic to me, it's not working. I'd rather see better wiki etiquette from you and more opportunities when you ''go the extra mile'' to be more respectful of other's edits and concerns, even if it isn't necessary according to policies. It shouldn't be surprising to you that if someone tries to fix something in an article, and you revert ''all'' their edits (even easily fixable positive edits), they'd feel frustrated at your actions. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 15:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:::"and seemed to be accusing me of hypocrisy" -- yes, it is. Whether or not you clicked the undo button, you groused at (and are continuing to grouse at) another editor for something you had messed up in the first place. That's not the same as accusing your original edit of malice.
:::"it seems like you're ignorant of wiki etiquette" -- I'm claiming you're ignorant of the realities of trying to keep the wiki in good condition, and are requesting special treatment for yourself. Every editor has the responsibility to make sure their own edits are correct. Reviewers have the responsibility to make sure that bad edits are not introduced. My edits have gotten wiped if they had egregious errors. So have most longterm editors. The standard is to check the edit history to figure out why the edits were undone, ask the undoing reviewer why they did so if you don't understand, and work the changes out on the talk page if you can't come to an agreement with them one-on-one. Not to accuse the reviewers of laziness or bad etiquette for not doing your job for you.
:::"If you're trying to sound sympathetic to me" -- god no. I'm trying to remind you that you've already been extended a lot of leeway by the mods, to my understanding because you are at least trying to improve the wiki, and that it's not exactly wise to keep going down this road. I'm trying to remind you that no amount of intent to improve the wiki, or even nominal seniority, will outweigh toxic behavior or ignorance of policy. Plenty of editors with much more contributions to the wiki have been permanently banned because they refused to detach their ego from their editing -- those like me who were readmitted, were only done so because we fully acknowledged our mistakes, and didn't try to give excuses for them.
:::"I'd rather see better wiki etiquette from you" -- this is, again, you choosing to lash out at other editors instead of taking the lesson and improving your own edits. This entire discussion didn't need to happen in the first place -- per the boldly noted edit notices baked into the edit interface, you're supposed to acknowledge that you made a misstep, and resubmit your work without the misstep. Not grouse at other editors for not taking extra time to do your work.
:::"they'd feel frustrated at your actions" -- it's not surprising. That doesn't make it right, which is the point here. Useful contributing to the wiki requires leaving your ego at the door, end of. Every productive, longtime editor has had to learn that lesson -- I am regularly corrected by TSH, for example, despite my being a much longer-term editor than he is. Same goes for all the long-lasting staff. And until you learn to stop tying your ego to your edits, past experience shows that things will continue to be rocky for you (disclaimer: I am no longer a mod due to stepping back to part-time status, so this is an observation, not a warning).{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:You seem to enjoy writing me long replies, but I don't feel like writing you a long one back because it's tiring. I'll just sum it up with this: Just because someone may have messed up first, it doesn't mean you can't go out of your way to show some respect in return. Give people the benefit of the doubt. It's often worth spending the extra minute of effort not to make someone feel offended. This has nothing to do with me requesting "special treatment" for myself, it's something you should do for all editors. A lot of people have complained to you on your talk page too, and it a lot of it seems to relate to what I'm telling you now. You can follow the policies ''and'' lack wiki etiquette, which is why a little effort and consideration can go a long way.
:Anyway, I finished KH3. I enjoyed the game, although I'm disappointed by certain creative directions. Since my hype train is over, I'm going to be editing this wiki less. I hope you're satisfied with the idea of talking me to less since I am with you. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 16:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
== Under Construction ==
Please don't remove the under construction notices from the keyblades. They are still missing recipe and stat growth info, as well as (in discussion) formchange and shotlock info.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:Also, the "Keyblades (Sora)" category is added automatically by the template, or at least is supposed to be.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
== Spoiler templates ==
Thank you for removing those.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
== Dark Riku ==
Fantastic job getting us a cleaner version of the render! Will you be able to do that/are you willing to do that with the other renders released we have yet to upload? - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 13:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
:Yeah, although I have priorities. If a render is poorly scanned (bad angles can result in deformities) or too low res, or isn't in the infobox, I'll likely skip those. Saix/Demyx/Ansem are coming up. And maybe Terra-Xehanort and Vexen. I don't have the Ultimania so I have to rely on random pics floating around the web. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 13:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
::I'll link you to all the renders I've gathered. For some, we will have to wait for ShardofTruth to get his Ultimania. Most of them, however, can be uploaded to at least serve as placeholders, like we did with the Journal renders before the Ultimania's release. - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 17:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
:::I've already seen [https://www.kh13.com/gallery/album/2608-kingdom-hearts-iii-ultimania/ this]. Sadly, not much is usable here. I did find renders of Sora's Final/Element/Blitz/Strike forms tho, so I can do those later. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 17:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
::::Where are you getting the renders in such good quality? Seriously, keep up the fantastic work! - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 19:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. Someone called PoppetNoix basically uploaded everything. I simply downloaded them from there. I have decent skills turning things into renders as it is (adjusting color tones, etc). I plan on doing a render or so each day. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 05:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
::::::I can't thank you enough for that. Each upload inspires the editor in me! - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 17:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
== 350x400px ==
Just a heads up that apparently preferences have changed, so the 350x400px I originally proposed has been changed to 300x400px. 350px was apparently exceeding the infobox on some pages.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 13:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
== Renders ==
Your work with the KH3 renders is absolutely fantastic! I really love it. I'm just wondering if you've come across a hooded Xion render yet used for her boss fight. I know there are renders dedicated to Ansem, Saïx, and Terra-Xehanort's boss battles so I was wondering if you've seen one for Xion as well? {{User:JTD95/Signature}} 19:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0_1UAmXgAAzOXR.jpg
That was posted by the same PoppetNoix previously mentioned, minus any of Soroxas's clean ups and edits. - [[User:Joveus|Joveus]] ([[User talk:Joveus|talk]]) 20:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
:You're welcome. I'm done the main renders - basically everything in the infobox on this wiki (I'm redoing Namine and maybe Dark Riku again later). All that's left is basically a few enemies and battle variations of renders. Because of this, I'm going to be a bit more lazy and do renders at a slower pace. If there's a particular render you want me to make (such as hooded Xion), you can let me know here tho. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 20:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
::If you're taking requests, have you had any luck finding a complete cloaked Vanitas render, it's the last one needed (with hooded Xion) to remake a better Real Organization XIII collage. The one PoppetNoix posted cuts off the end of the Void Gear, and the battle render does not have the black coat. I also second JTD95's requests for the normal clothed Ansem, berserk Saix, and Terra-Xehanort with Guardian in addition to Dark Riku and Vanitas without their black coats (all are found in the boss battle section of the Ultimania) - [[User:Joveus|Joveus]] ([[User talk:Joveus|talk]]) 21:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
:[https://i.imgur.com/6artXRW.png How's this as a base]? I found this online, but can't remember where I found it. I tried lengthening the blade so it doesn't look too short. I can get the rest of the renders you mentioned in the following days. I'll prioritize this and hooded Xion tho. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 21:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
::Impressively quick, I didn't think you'd find one so soon, let alone already have it. - [[User:Joveus|Joveus]] ([[User talk:Joveus|talk]]) 21:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
:: Please don't lengthen the blade. The reason we're using these Ultimania scans instead of in-game models is because they're official. If you alter them by making the blade longer, or changing anything really, they're no longer official.
:: Also, I have the Ultimania, so if you're missing a scan for a render, I might be able to scan it. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 21:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
:I decided to use Poppet's as the base actually, and combine the full Keyblade from the other scan, so ignore the Imgur pic. And the reason for the blade lengthening was because the original scan seemed a bit warped (due to curvature of the book's spine when taking the photo). I'm pretty sure I found the right version now tho. I'll upload the full Vanitas render tonight or tomorrow. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 22:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
::Ideally, we will have renders for every enemy, character, weapon, etc. You are doing amazing work, Soroxas, so do feel free to continue going at your own pace. There is no need to rush. :) - {{User:EternalNothingnessXIII/Sig}} 22:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
==Present tense==
When doing captions, please use the present tense, not the present continuous tense.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 20:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
:Not sure what the difference is. Could you please give me an example? [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 21:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
::Present tense is, for example, "Sora and Kairi '''reunite''' with each other", while you often use the present continuous tense (Sora and Kairi '''reuniting''' with each other"), which does not adhere to our policy.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 20:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
== Curaga ==
The ability articles are not walkthroughs. [[Walkthrough:Kingdom Hearts/Hollow Bastion]] would specify that info; the ability articles are supposed to cover enough to specify which is which without getting too wordy.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
:Not everyone cares to read entire long walkthroughs, and if a wiki has to refer people to read ''entire'' walkthroughs just to convey decent important information (such as the conditions for Aerith to actually appear in the library), it fails in my eyes. KH1 is a rather obtuse game where there are orders to do things in, hidden mechanics, conditions, etc, so I don't see why a mere sentence longer (which is far from treating it like a "walkthrough" imo) to eliminate confusion for newcomers is a big deal. In any case, "after defeating Behemoth" is a decent middle ground. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 19:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
== Infoboxes ==
Please see [https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=User%3AKrytenKoro%2FInfoboxes&type=revision&diff=774978&oldid=773182 this example] for how each infobox should be fixed.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 12:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
==Ban==
{{Xion4ever|time=22:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)|text=Ah yes, I know your next complaint, right? "There's no point in debating anything anymore once an admin steps in because on this wiki, I've seen routinely that it's futile and nothing changes," right? Far from it...There is never a point to debate anything here, because debating would imply a more argumentative, or user vs staff/user instead of a productive discussion. I, too, can play the game of semantics.
What bothers me is how you have the potential to be a truly great editor, but your attitude and communication skills are severely lacking. The attitude portion is why you are primarily being banned. Similar to the "real world," it does not mean anything if someone is of high caliber if their attitude/behavior stink. I don't care how right or opinionated you may be, you do not insult other editors or respond in such an immature fashion. If you cannot explain your side without belittling someone, then you need to rethink how you talk to people. It is pointless, counterproductive, a waste of time, and will not be tolerated.
Several staff members and regular editors have tried explaining all of this to you before, though. Your personal talk page, various article talk pages, and the edit summaries all confirm this. We have been incredibly patient and have tried to help you understand.
If you can return and make your points in a more civilized manner, we will be glad to have you. In the meantime, please take the three months off to cool down. If you have not changed your behavior by then, you stand to be permanently banned.}}

Please note that all contributions to the Kingdom Hearts Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see KHWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)