Editing User talk:BebopKate
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
{{DTN|time=02:19, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|text=Did someone say "DTN"? | {{DTN|time=02:19, August 11, 2010 (UTC)|text=Did someone say "DTN"? | ||
I do apologize for my recent inactivity. I have been incredibly busy this summer with marching band, <!--<3 <3 <3 <3 <3-->camps | I do apologize for my recent inactivity. I have been incredibly busy this summer with marching band, <!--<3 <3 <3 <3 <3-->camps a lovely vacation, and regular IRC babysitting (which is no longer the case). I've got a life, you guys know that. But honestly, when ''Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days'' came out, I don't remember a copious amount of fake articles and vandalism. There were a few here and there, but nothing that someone cannot ping an active admin about to take out. Also remember than certain inactive admins are available very often by IRC, sepcifically Hexedmagica. I think I've seen Ultima there too. | ||
My courses begin again soon, and I will not be able to remain my previous "full activity." I can still do what I can, though, should not be a problem to contact me for administrative purposes. An admin is just as much an editor as any other user, the only deciding factor that can relate an admin's activity to a need for more admins is how easily they can be contacted, and how often they can check the wiki. I should still be able to receive my watchlist updates from my phone and be on my laptop every day to keep up with the notifications, so I see no problem there. I don't think we truly need this staff election. A smaller one for ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'' I would have agreed with, but not the induction of 2+ new admins and several new moderators. Patience needs to be learned, what is wrong with the amount of current staff activity now? Is the wiki crumbling down? Is there mass vandalism that cannot be stopped by admins? Are fake articles and information pouring in? The answer to all of these questions is a big "no". Even with ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'', I do not think levels of vandalism and new editors will rise enough to require two new admins and several new mods. Heck, even just one new admin to replace the [[User:KrytenKoro|Grand Super Special Awesome King Administrator of Ridiculous Greatness]] would be enough | My courses begin again soon, and I will not be able to remain my previous "full activity." I can still do what I can, though, should not be a problem to contact me for administrative purposes. An admin is just as much an editor as any other user, the only deciding factor that can relate an admin's activity to a need for more admins is how easily they can be contacted, and how often they can check the wiki. I should still be able to receive my watchlist updates from my phone and be on my laptop every day to keep up with the notifications, so I see no problem there. I don't think we truly need this staff election. A smaller one for ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'' I would have agreed with, but not the induction of 2+ new admins and several new moderators. Patience needs to be learned, what is wrong with the amount of current staff activity now? Is the wiki crumbling down? Is there mass vandalism that cannot be stopped by admins? Are fake articles and information pouring in? The answer to all of these questions is a big "no". Even with ''Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep'', I do not think levels of vandalism and new editors will rise enough to require two new admins and several new mods. Heck, even just one new admin to replace the [[User:KrytenKoro|Grand Super Special Awesome King Administrator of Ridiculous Greatness]] would be enough. | ||
Look at the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki. You know how many active admins they have? No more than five or so. We certainly do not need a full set of, eventually, 10+ admins active on a ''smaller'', ''less active'' wiki.}} | Look at the ''Final Fantasy'' Wiki. You know how many active admins they have? No more than five or so. We certainly do not need a full set of, eventually, 10+ admins active on a ''smaller'', ''less active'' wiki.}} |