Editing Talk:Thunder

Especially because KHII clarifies it as the "Element" system, these should simply list the places where Elements can be obtained, and not try to claim which is which (see Ursula).[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 05:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I made an edit pertaining to that today. I agree that we should put them in a way other than saying which available obtain/upgrade is which variant of the spell.--[[User:DoorToNothing|<span style="color:navy ;">'''Door'''</span>]][[User:DoorToNothing|<span style="color:dimgray ;">'''To'''</span>]][[User talk:DoorToNothing|<span style="color:darkslategray ;">'''Nothing'''</span>]] 05:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

== Learning Drops ==

These sections are originally based on the format I used for [[Mythril]] long, long ago, and it seems redundant to have a line for "drops" that redirects to a section that, by its existence, implies you get the command through a drop. Can we remove those, or do people feel they are necessary (and why)?

Also, do we want to split off "Treasures", like we do with [[Mythril]]? Or is "Learning" the command equivalent of Treasures?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Also, do we want to split off "Treasures", like we do with [[Mythril]]? Or is "Learning" the command equivalent of Treasures?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
-:If we remove those, should we also remove the Command Meld/Conversion lines, because of the Recipe section?
-:I think we should just keep the treasures under Learning. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 20:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
-::Probably, yeah. It seems self evident to me that if there's a recipe for something, you can use a recipe to make it. ''Perhaps'' the drop/recipe/conversion section should have notes on whether it is character specific?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 21:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)