| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 163: |
Line 163: |
| What do I do about [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/wiki/File:King.jpg this pic]? Do I just add it to here? --[[User:Bettafishrule2579|Bettafishrule2579]] 17:43, 22 April 2011 (EDT) | | What do I do about [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/wiki/File:King.jpg this pic]? Do I just add it to here? --[[User:Bettafishrule2579|Bettafishrule2579]] 17:43, 22 April 2011 (EDT) |
| :That picture is already on the article. -> [http://www.khwiki.net/Removed_content_in_the_Kingdom_Hearts_series#Lazy_Afternoons_alternate click]--[[User:Xion4ever|<span style="color:black">''Xion''</span>]][[User talk:Xion4ever|<span style="color:darkred">''4''</span>]][[User:Xion4ever/Atelier|<span style="color:maroon">''ever''</span>]] 17:54, 22 April 2011 (EDT) | | :That picture is already on the article. -> [http://www.khwiki.net/Removed_content_in_the_Kingdom_Hearts_series#Lazy_Afternoons_alternate click]--[[User:Xion4ever|<span style="color:black">''Xion''</span>]][[User talk:Xion4ever|<span style="color:darkred">''4''</span>]][[User:Xion4ever/Atelier|<span style="color:maroon">''ever''</span>]] 17:54, 22 April 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
| == Windmill ==
| |
|
| |
| The Ultimania claims that it is a gift given for Streetpassing at "Present Portals".{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == "censorship" ==
| |
|
| |
| Realized that having a conversation in the edit description is a terrible way to go about things, so I'm leaving this here. Calling Aqua's clothing change "censorship" is extremely misleading because censorship in most cases only refers to a higher body. In this context that would refer to an executive at Square Enix, a government, Sony, or something like that. "Censorship" in colloquial use, referring to "covering" literally anything, is not usually used when talking about decisions related to the publication of a work. Especially the sentence "due to censorship" makes absolutely 0 sense, because it seems to refer to censorship as a "force" rather than citing the events surrounding the change. To my knowledge, Nomura made the decision to cover up Aqua's clothing entirely on his own, for whatever reason. If this is not the case, then the details regarding what led to the change should be put in to clarify the situation, otherwise putting the word "censorship" there is very confusing and leads people to believe that somebody other than Nomura made the decision. -A {{unsigned|67.168.190.229}}
| |
| :I've revised the passage to use the term "self-censorhip", which is what it's called when an author modifies a part of their work out of concern for society's sensibilities.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 01:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Unused song==
| |
| Is [http://kh13.com/news/an-unused-song-has-been-found-in-kingdom-hearts-ii-code this] significant? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 22:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
| :Yes.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 03:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Woody and Buzz ==
| |
|
| |
| According to a recent interview with Nomura Woody and Buzz were never really properly planned to appear in the game:
| |
| :"——Toy Story finally arrived in Kingdom Hearts 3, but elements related to the film of Pixar were already founded in both Kingdom Hearts and Kingdom Hearts II code. Can you tell us why they weren’t inserted in those games, in the end?
| |
|
| |
| Nomura: I always wanted Toy Story in Kingdom Hearts, and I already hoped to insert a world based on it in the first chapter. For this reason, I asked our staff to create something related to Toy Story, in case we were able to get the OK from the Disney. Sadly no possibility were given to us and so the idea never entered in the development stage."
| |
| :- [[User:JTD95|JTD95]] ([[User talk:JTD95|talk]]) 03:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
| |
| ::But in a more recent interview, he talked about how it's false that they were only intended to show to disney as proof of concept, not for the sake of adding to the game.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 12:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == CoM Org members KH2 battles ==
| |
|
| |
| Is it worth noting somewhere that all the battle animations for the Absent Silhouettes can be found within the original KH2 files? - [[User:JTD95|JTD95]] ([[User talk:JTD95|talk]]) 00:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Update 1.09 changes ==
| |
|
| |
| Is it worth noting that the latest update changed the skybox for the Keyblade Graveyard and removed the dark balls falling from Kingdom Hearts? - [[User:JTD95|JTD95]] ([[User talk:JTD95|talk]]) 19:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
| |
| :Does this happen in the regular game too? I thought it was specifically changed for ReMind. In my opinion that's a drastic change, it should be covered here. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 19:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
| |
| ::It's the result of the 1.09 update. The change went live a full day before Re Mind was out in New Zealand. --[[User:Samoa Joe|Samoa Joe]] ([[User talk:Samoa Joe|talk]]) 20:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Game Studio ==
| |
|
| |
| It's a minor detail, but although the main page says proposals for KH1 were brought to Buena Vista, according to Wikipedia they were Disney Interactive from 1994-2002, and it says Disney Interactive on the game itself. However, Wikipedia also says, ''"Buena Vista Games is probably best known for the Kingdom Hearts series along with Japanese developer Square Enix."'' under the 2003-2007 section. Does anyone know which one is right? --[[File:Riku Sprite KHD.png]] [[User:Mikoto|mikoto]] 07:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Terminology ==
| |
|
| |
| I've been looking at the file name for files in the article and come to the realized there is no real cohesive or consistent naming scheme for them and those that are named don't make sense in correlation to each other. The naming for files are as follow; Unused, Removed, and Demo.
| |
|
| |
| Like, why is "[[:File:Disney Castle Trailer KH.png|File: Disney Castle Trailer KH.png]]" not noted on what kind of naming it is, but "[[:File:Kingdom Hearts coded cutscene (Removed) 02 KHC.png|File:Kingdom Hearts coded cutscene (Removed) 02 KHC.png]]", despite both them appearing in early trailer/screenshots is.
| |
|
| |
| I think the wiki needs to reclassify/reorganized/define all the different uses of the naming term based on how its used in video game development, so as follow;
| |
|
| |
| * '''Unused''' - Media that were made but not used in the final product, but '''doesn't''' appear in press/early media. Ex: [[:File:Kingdom Key D KH3D.png|File:Kingdom Key D KH3D.png is an example of a Unused element that was never shown off.]]<br>Purposed name: ''Kingdom Key D (Unused) KH3D''.
| |
|
| |
| * '''Removed''' - Media that were made but not used in the final product, but '''does''' appear in press/early media. Ex: [[:File:Jungle King (card).png|File:Jungle King (card).png is an example of a Removed element that was shown off, but doesn't appear in the final product.]]<br>Purposed name: ''Jungle King (card) (Removed) KHCOM''.
| |
|
| |
| * '''Beta''' - Media that were made but '''change''' between revealed and final released. Ex: [[:File:Aqua (Unused) 02 KHBBS.png|File:Aqua (Unused) 02 KHBBS.png is an example of a Beta element that was changed for final released.]]<br>Purposed name: ''Aqua (Beta) 02 KHBBS.png''.
| |
|
| |
| * '''Demo''' - Stuff really only apply to the KH3D Demo content and there really not much to change for them.
| |
|
| |
| Thats about it, thanks for coming to my tedtalk. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 16:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :I definitely agree that the current naming pattern makes no sense. That said, it might be cleaner to just have most files as '''Removed''' – regardless of if it was shown off, it still was planned for the game and subsequently cut. If we know what build of the game the content is from, then '''Demo''', '''Alpha''', or '''Beta''' would be appropriate, but I'm not sure what we gain from differentiating '''Unused''' and '''Removed'''.
| |
| :For instance, unique versions of both "Guardando nel buio" and "He's a Pirate" were found in the files of KHII, but since only one was refitted for the final game, they would be titled differently. Likewise, having both "Unused" and "Removed" stumbles when considering concept art and interviews about early content released after the game itself. It just seems easier to have it all under the "Removed" umbrella, especially since it's all going on [[Removed content]] and [[:Category:Removed content]] anyway. —[[User:Aid1043|<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:110%; color:#9932CC">Aid</span>]][[User talk:Aid1043|<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:110%; color:#9932CC">1043</span>]] 15:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::Right, thats fine. Simplifying and Categorizing terms would be easier. So something like;
| |
|
| |
| Beta - Media that were made, but '''change''' between revealed and final released.
| |
|
| |
| Removed - Media that were made, but **not** used in the final product..
| |
|
| |
| This should make everything easier to categorized. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 01:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
| |
