You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| You should create a discussion form about the [[Unversed]]'s eyes.[[User:Edgeshadow|Edgeshadow]] | | You should create a discussion form about the [[Unversed]]'s eyes.[[User:Edgeshadow|Edgeshadow]] |
| :Do we even have a confirmation of what each eye mean? If not, isn't it Speculation?{{User:Xabryn/Sig}}15:50, August 28, 2010 (UTC) | | :Do we even have a confirmation of what each eye mean? If not, isn't it Speculation?{{User:Xabryn/Sig}}15:50, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
|
| |
| Iam just suggesting, whats wrong with that?[[User:Edgeshadow|Edgeshadow]]
| |
|
| |
| There is nothing wrong with creating a discussion, but the Wiki policy don't allow speculation so if we dont have a confirmation then it shouldn't be in the article--[[User:Xabryn|Xabryn]] 15:57, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| It's the general shape of the eyes that creates the expression. Its just a vague descriptive term, and having it in the design to describe the shape of the eye isn't speculation as long as it's not implying something (for example, if it said "the eyes llok sad, so the Unversed personifies sorrow", that's speculation).{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}16:29, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == English Video? ==
| |
|
| |
| {{Chihuahuaman|time=19:18, October 6, 2010 (UTC)|text=Is there an english video? if someone can post one it would be most apreaciated.}}
| |