Editing Talk:Master's Defender

{{Peetzaman|text=Should this article be deleted? It doesn't say anything that the Master Erauqs page doesn't say.}}
{{neumannz|time=20:32, November 12, 2009 (UTC)|text=Not to mention it's exactly the same as [[Eraqus's Keyblade]]...}}

I know there are 2 page one is "Eraqus's Keyblade" and one is "Master Eraqus's Keyblade". I created "Master Eraqus's Keyblade" because his name is called Master Eraqus not just Eraqus. So maybe delete Eraqus's Keyblade and use "Master Eraqus's Keyblade" instead. Cococrash11

{{neumannz|time=20:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC)|text="Master" is a title, really...<br>Anyways, next time you should just <b>move</b> the page instead of making a new one, so that we don't have to delete one of them}}
{{Maggosh|text=Um, no. We already have this page. Delete. Delete, I SAY!}}

What about Master Xehanort? Also how do you move page? Cococrash11
{{Maggosh|text=Well, we actually '''need''' to discern him from [[Xehanort]]. There's no other characters named Eraqus so there's no need for adding 'Master'.}}
{{neumannz|time=03:18, November 13, 2009 (UTC)|text=Cococrash:<br>You see the options at the top of the page:<br><span style="font-family:lucida sans">"Edit this page; Leave Message; History; Move; Watch"</span><br>Most of these are on every wiki page. I'm talking about "Move"}}


==Reversions==
Why exactly do people keep reverting the edits about the shape of his keyblade? It seems intentional and notable to me, but maybe I'm missing something... [[User:Dazuro|Dazuro]] 01:51, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
:That would be because the shape of the keyblade is already explained in the article, no need to add it as trivia. --{{User:Yer mom/Sig}} 02:23, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
But the article doesn't mention the Square-Enix connection. [[User:Dazuro|Dazuro]] 02:33, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

==*sigh*... idiot...==

{{Template:Guyviroth|text=The picture i provided was not fanart... I have no idea how you came to the conclusion, but it is very astounding that you did... But, i will explain why it's not fanart.
Take my picture
Paste into MS paint.
Turn it 180 degrees.
Compare it to the picture of Master Eraqus in the last Vjump scan.
Oh look... they look extremely similar; a bit too similar to be mere fanart, right?}}
::...except that the hilt has never been shown uncovered, and the keychain is at the wrong angle. (180 degrees would have it pointing ''up'', for starters. Just "touching it up" would count it as fanart - if it's not in an officially released image, it's not official.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 05:04, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

== Name ==

{{ST|text=although i'm sure someone has probably addressed this somewhere else, now that we know that Aqua is is seen wielding this in a playable episode, think we'll finally get a name for this}}
{{LA|Vtext=Yeee up~}}

== "Master Keeper" ==

http://i961.photobucket.com/albums/ae93/maggosh/EK_MasterKeeper.png

I'll just put this here. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 00:19, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

:w00t  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 00:28, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

== Trivia ==

I don't know if it's really necessary to ask, but I feel that maybe I should. Does it seem appropriate to list the keyblade's hand-guard's simple ''square'' shape and the E-shaped teeth (as well as forming half of a square shape) as a possible (if not likely) shout out to Eraqus' naming scheme? [[User:Twilightning|Twilightning]] 15:06, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

...That's actually an interesting trivia. But it sounds like speculation :/ {{User:17master/Sign}} 15:39, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

I only really aim to clarify because [[No Name]] boldly (not even as trivia) lists assumed affiliations with Organization XIII, as well as an assumed reasoning behind its, well, name, and I wonder if this possible connection would also qualify. [[User:Twilightning|Twilightning]] 15:45, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

It's our policy to merge trivias to appropriate sections of the article whenever it's possible, so your "trivia" should also be merged in the designs section. {{User:17master/Sign}} 15:49, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

So, would this information be permitted? I had changed it before, but it was undone. No problem altogether, though if it doesn't belong, then I'm having trouble understanding why the math included on the [[No Name]] page belongs. [[User:Twilightning|Twilightning]] 14:56, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

The difference with this and No Name is that No Name bears outright similarities to the motifs of Organization XIII. Saying that the "E" is because of "Enix", and even more, that the square guard is because of "Square", is downright speculation {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 15:01, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

I'll take a look at No Name's article to see if I can thin that down a bit because, from what I remember, it did go a bit overboard. Considering the connection to Square Enix's name has been explicitly confirmed by Nomura, I think that could work as part of the design if it was worded properly.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}15:23, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 The difference with this and No Name is that No Name bears outright similarities to the motifs of Organization XIII. Saying that the "E" is because of "Enix", and even more, that the square guard is because of "Square", is downright speculation {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 15:01, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
-I'll take a look at No Name's article to see if I can thin that down a bit because, from what I remember, it did go a bit overboard. Considering the connection to Square Enix's name has been explicitly confirmed by Nomura, I think that could work as part of the design if it was worded properly. EDIT: I took care of No Name, and I still really like the observation you made, but after thinking it over a bit more, it ''is'' a bit of a stretch.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}15:23, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
+I'll take a look at No Name's article to see if I can thin that down a bit because, from what I remember, it did go a bit overboard. Considering the connection to Square Enix's name has been explicitly confirmed by Nomura, I think that could work as part of the design if it was worded properly.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}15:23, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
-== KHIII teaser ==
-The Keyblade Sora picks up in the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AGWn4srbYw teaser trailer] looks suspiciously like Master Keeper (best view at 0:50). This noteworthy or...? [[User:Ultima Spark|Ultima Spark]] ([[User talk:Ultima Spark|talk]]) 02:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
-== Keyblade of Darkness ==
-So, only Keyblades from the Realm of Darkness can open paths to the Realm of Darkness, according to Chip and Dale. In the very next scene, the Master's Defender is used to open a path to the Realm of Darkness. By that very definition, that would make this Keyblade one of darkness, right? - [[User:Joveus|Joveus]] ([[User talk:Joveus|talk]]) 19:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
-:Or Chip and Dale are wrong, or it's a special case due to the link to Aqua. There's also the interpretation that Sora is basically using Link Block, with Riku as his Dream Eater.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 19:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
-::Late reply, but according to the KH3 glossary entry 'The Three Realms', the power of waking can be used to get into the RoD. So... maybe Master's Defender just... helped with that?--[[User:Mikoto|Mikoto]] ([[User talk:Mikoto|talk]]) 21:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)