Editing Talk:Illusion-L

Could we add barrier and the finish command to the table, possibly as a split table as with Anti Form? I think we should also have a column for images.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

== Format ==

Is this the decided format for these command pages? I don't think the image of the Unversed belongs here and the image column in the table should just be turned into a gallery at the bottom (it's not a good idea to squash gifs into a table like that). {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 01:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
:The lead image should be a gif of the character using the Illusion command. You can whip up a gallery draft if you'd like.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
::I would, if we had images to show. Anyway, it would've just been a basic "Gallery" section:
<gallery>
File:Example.png|Stomp
File:Example.png|Revert
File:Example.png|Attack
File:Example.png|Guard
File:Example.png|Charge
</gallery>
::The captions could definitely be improved. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 18:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

== Guard ==

The Guard command was removed from here. Is it not mentioned in the Ultimania (I guess for the Shoegazer)?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 17:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
:The Guard command does exist but unlike the Attack command, we don't actually know what its name is. It could be any action command and it's actually more akin to Barrier than Guard/Block. Simply because it defends the user and is activated by {{button|s}}, do we have enough reason to call the technique a version of Guard? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 15:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
::I'd be fine leaving it as an unnamed technique, but let's see what the Shoegazer's command is called.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The Shoegazer page calls it "Shield" but it doesn't have the Japanese name. It turns out that the "Kick" command is actually still called "Attack" in game, but we've changed the name to match the Shoegazer's technique. I think that we should stick to "Attack". Thoughts? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 09:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
:::We should use what the game uses, yeah, though doesn't it say "Attack" for all of their base attacks?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 14:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
::::Yes, which is why changing the name is confusing. I think the illusion base attacks should be treated as normal combos/attack patterns and should just be described in a mechanics section. It doesn't really need a name. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 22:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)